Adam Smith: The Economic Nuance Of Capitalism

Superior Essays
Adam Smith
Background
In the world of economics, Adam Smith stands out as dominating, central figure. Numerous commentators have often referred to him as the founder of modern economics; essentially the reason why free trade exists (Schumacher, 2012). But as Henry (2000) provides, the position occupied and articulated by Adam Smith in the development of economic theory is of precarious enjoyment, mainly because some of his works essentially contain dangerous elements that are evidently innate in the works of Karl Max. In this regard, therefore, there are those who see Smith’s works as a definitive backdrop for the existence of the economic nuance of capitalism. Adam Smith, according to John Rae (2005), was born on 5th June, 1723 at Kirkcaldy,
…show more content…
As such, according to Hunt (2002), Smith determined that emancipation of producers through the increase of freedom and the extension of rights essentially laid the foundation for the improvement and commercialization of the economic state of the society. A keen analysis of this statement provides for the comprehension that Smith advanced that increment of freedoms led to increased productivity form the producers who were motivated to maximize personal profit, a concept that gave birth to capitalism. In essence, Smith theory of economic development was based on the idea that individuals acted selfishly and strictly on their own behalf, and on the behalf of the classes of which they represented (Hunt, 2002). While some may view the independent and selfish operation of individuals for the maximization of profit to be egoistic, Smith deduced that it promoted economic development because it inadvertently led to a benevolent harmony, aided by an invisible hand. As Lange (2013) frames it, the theory of economic development innate in The Wealth of Nations depicts the progression of opulence in the society, which as Singh (1959) asserts, is founded on the doctrine of free trade and socio-political

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This passage is found in Chapter VII, paragraph sixteen of by Adam Smith`s An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Briefly called the Wealth of Nations demonstrates the general principles of political economy. The book was written in the 18th century by a brilliant Scottish political economist and thinker, and founder of the modern classical economic thought, Adam Smith, who wasn`t an old-fashioned believer in state control of trade and industry and didn`t describe the most proper regulations for securing wealth and abundance as well. The some portion of Smith’s lectures such as ‘Jurisprudence’, which is about ‘Police, Revenue and Arms’ and the ‘Laws of Nations’, theory of the general principles of law and government,…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Smith was apart of the Scottish enlightenment and was very worried about the wealth of the nation. Also he worried about the social consequences of the divisions of labor. Smith thought that people would bet better off if they were more interested in personal gain. Smith believed that the divisions of labour would make people’s person gain peck. If people were not able to advance it would have a negative affect on society.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To leave the markets alone, the laissez-faire approach to economics was the catchphrase for Adam Smith and other Classical economists. This approach lent its power to the “invisible hand” of the market and the idea that adjusting the way the market works would ultimately affect its ability to function properly. Smith believed the market was a “perfectly ordered mechanism operating according to natural laws.” This was a misguided idea, when the market is left to make its own decisions without restraint, they are not likely to make everyone better off like Smith thought (Canterbery 39-45).…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This man truly considers this rebirth of an industrial society to be a flawless ideal as he continuously worships the system that has provided his wealth and fortunes. This new economy allows the poor to enjoy products that the previous wealthy societies could not, and the construction of an American dream coinciding with capitalism and reward. And any people who contest this thought will be proven incorrect once a comparison the previous and current societies are vocalized, as the entire human race benefits from such an integral system. He then proceeds to question why the system has allowed very few to attain total control of it while others and also explains exactly why he has written this essay and what the need of it is. Furthermore, there are only three viable methods to dispose of wealth: inheritance, public purpose, and finally administration from the…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New Imperialism Dbq Essay

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From capitalism and communism to the struggles between the power hungry Europeans and the natives of the new world. The history of European countries sneaking resources from Africa. As well with the ideas of Karl Marx on communism and Adam Smith with capitalism. People of the proletariat or middle class have not been treated fairly by the higher class as we know as the bourgeoisie or high class. Adam Smith’s idea on capitalism is still used in our modern day world.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At a time when the common people were not allowed to make decisions that could benefit the economy, Adam Smith stated that individual decision-making is crucial in order to maintain and support an economic system. When people have the right to freely pursue their own economic interests, the country will benefit (Document C). The country benefits because of what Adam Smith mentioned, which was an “invisible hand.” This invisible hand causes the sum of self-interest to result in the best possible interest for the state. Again, individual freedom is shown to be a key factor in improving…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq On The Enlightenment

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He also states that, “As every individual, therefore, endeavours as much as he can both to employ his capital [money] in the support of...industry, and so to direct that industry that its produce may be of the greatest value; every individual necessarily [contributes to] the annual revenue of the society as great as he can…” (Smith, Document C). Smith believes that prosperous citizens make for a prosperous…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.” Adam smith wrote this robust statement in his book The Wealth of Nations in 1776 (para. 203). Adam Smith was a brilliant Scottish social philosopher, who forever influenced economics with his book The Wealth of Nations. In this book Adam Smith wrote about many different aspects of an economy, consequentially, he wrote a metaphor that has shaped his legacy tremendously. The metaphor he wrote dealt with the “free market” theory; which he wrote acted as an “invisible hand.”…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there have been various influential economists whose ideas have changed America. Names such as Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes and Karl Marx have been forever etched in history as the most influential economists of all time, however it is important to realize that these men’s economic…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith was an economist from the mid-late 1700’s and he was able to explain the knowledge of Capitalism; elaborating on how to make money from the free markets that was influential to survival at that time. He wrote a book, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which describes the origins of Capitalism in great details with petty examples of this logic set in motion. On the other side of the spectrum, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both produce a collaborative piece called The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticizes the bourgeoisie, and pushes for a lifestyle in which all property is government owned; eliminating the class system and having all people of the nation work for the same salary. There is a stark…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I feel as though his theory is important to understand because the issue of government involvement in businesses is still being debated about today, especially in recent presidential elections. In chapter 2 of the book, New Ideas From Dead Economists, written by Todd G. Buchholz, it discusses the background of Adam…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith couldn’t be more different in their views on how economic growth could improve the material well being of the working-class. Marx believed economic growth came at the backs of the proletariat, and that most growth is horded by the bourgeois, only beneficial to the capital elite and added to commodity fetishism. While, Adam Smith believed greater national output was beneficial to everyone, raise all boats with the tide, and increase the wages of the working class, too. The difference lies in the two economists view on whether or not labor is exploited and the role of capital accumulation in that exploitation. It is best to compare Carl Marx’s, The Law of Motion of Capitalism, to Adam Smith’s, Theory of economic Development,…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith and Karl Marx, two brilliant men in the field of economics, supplied their reasonings…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflicting Views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the Division of Labor and the Role of Money in Exchange In their works, Adam Smith and Karl Marx prove to have differing opinions on money and the division of labor. Although they understand money as a representation of value and as a medium of exchange, they arrive at different conclusions about the role of money in social life. Smith sees the division of labor as a constructive system and a means of furthering exchange, leading to the use of money. Marx, on the other hand, finds labor to turn human beings into alienated workers, and the division of labor to spread and increase this concept.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His legacy has been widespread across the world earning him the title of “Father of Economics”, as as one of the founders of the field of social science by many by many (Adam, 2008). His wisdom has inspired countless philosophers, politicians and governments. To name a few that Smith has inspired: Margaret Thatcher, Thomas Jefferson, Karl Marx, David Ricardo, John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman (Adam, 2008). His words on politics, economics and social interactions have inspired neoliberal governing systems and world rules to instil a “laissez-faire” approach to their markets (Adam,…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics