Human Nature In Adam Smith's The Wealth Of Nations

Improved Essays
Adam Smith’s the Wealth of Nations depicts the developments of a Commercial State derived from self-interest. He makes the assumption that people act on a rational basis as part of human nature. Smith’s trans-historical account is demonstrating that all matters as natural; therefore, it is nature itself that pushes a society to become commercialized. Smith introduces the division of labor as a product of self-interest because it is in human nature for one to seek to produce more goods. Division of labor is seen as “the greatest improvement in the productive powers of labour” (Smith 3). Through the pin factory example, Smith demonstrates how the division of labour operates through specialization. By having individuals perform one specific task …show more content…
Inherently, natural ability allows one to specialize in that area to produce more goods for exchange. He discusses use value and exchange value as natural rules in exchanging, and believes the basis for exchange is rooted in self-interest. Though money— “a universal instrument of commerce”—facilitates exchange, labor is the true measure of value, not money, because the value of money changes (Smith 31). The division of labor allows one to exchange at a more productive rate so that laborers can gain a surplus in production. This surplus, if not exchanged, can be accumulated, like how capital would be. Capital can be saved or reinvested into society. Smith addresses that the problem with division of labor is that being skilled in one area may discourage workers and also create ignorant people. Though division of labor may cause inequality and low-skilled workers, Smith believes that it raises the overall wealth and happiness of a …show more content…
Self-interest drives a society to become a Commercial Society, which, according to Smith, is rooted in human nature. Through the division of labor, laborers will be able to drastically increase their productions, stimulating the growth of the economy. A growing economy is parallel to growth in capitals, therefore the overall wellness of the nation. Under Capitalism, self-interest, as part of human nature, signifies self-improvement. By reinvesting capital, the overall capital of the nation will grow and therefore increasing the wages of the workers. This increases the wealth of a nation as a whole because a society cannot be deemed as successful and happy if laborers are poor. Through the division of labor, productivity increases; therefore, laborers are richer and happier. Division of labor can yield efficiency, and efficiency allows people to produce at a higher rate. What this implies is that Capitalism drives people to produce more and compete because if one individual is making more than another, that individual would have the intention to surpass the other because it is in human nature to work for self-interest. Through competition, laborers are able to further their productions. The market works because competition balances it with self-interest as the motivator for exchange. The market in a Capitalist’s world is regulated by self-interest and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Smith was apart of the Scottish enlightenment and was very worried about the wealth of the nation. Also he worried about the social consequences of the divisions of labor. Smith thought that people would bet better off if they were more interested in personal gain. Smith believed that the divisions of labour would make people’s person gain peck. If people were not able to advance it would have a negative affect on society.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smith and Marx created the industrial revolution and they have some similar ideas and have different ideas of our economy. Smith and Marx only in common was the creation of the industrial revolution. These two economies guys do not have much common, in fact that they have the opposite ideas from another. Smith ideas is the Laisser-faire where the economy is not to have the government be involved with it and he think the economy will fix itself that is the visible hand.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    625). On the other hand, he noted that society fostering the division of labor limits the majority of individuals to a few simple tasks or job opportunities. While such tasks would not necessarily require an education, they may leave the majority of the population with a sense of unfulfillment regarding their occupation. Building further on this idea, Smith stated that while the division of labor improved the material living conditions for the majority of the population, it rendered the worker ‘‘as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become by confining their everyday mental activities to performing one or two very simple operations” Gilead, 2013, p.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is often said that significant change requires big thoughts, ideas, and suggestions. In the late seventeenth and eighteenth century, there was a period of many of these substantial changes. A group of men and women intellectuals called philosophes were hopeful in discovering new ways to understand and improve society, investing a variety of areas from science to religion. Many believed that if they paid close attention to nature and their surroundings, this could highly benefit society and could be applied to activities such as government and economics. Another belief was that reason was a great way to discover the truth, which is also why the Enlightenment period was called the age of reason.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newton's Laws Dbq Essay

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most people worked for wealth in the support of industry. Smith’s main idea was for people to do what they want to do, and also enjoy their occupation. He is still considered the most influential philosopher in the field of economics today. The last philosopher is Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq On The Enlightenment

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He also states that, “As every individual, therefore, endeavours as much as he can both to employ his capital [money] in the support of...industry, and so to direct that industry that its produce may be of the greatest value; every individual necessarily [contributes to] the annual revenue of the society as great as he can…” (Smith, Document C). Smith believes that prosperous citizens make for a prosperous…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Darwin’s way of thinking expanded far beyond his area of expertise, it expended all the way to psychology, physics, literature and even politics and economics. If you asked him “How much of his work would impact other fields?” personally I do not think he would have known. Darwinian thinking is now deeply engraved in areas such as economics and even business administration. Through this paper I will attempt to see how Darwin interacted with economists of his time such as Karl Marx, how much Adam Smith influenced Darwin, and how the Victorian economy affected how people acted.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Adam Smith believed that capitalism was the best thing for a country’s economy. He realized that by everyone specializing in one thing and selling a product for selfish reasons, society would benefit because everyone would have their needs. He believed in an ‘invisible hand’ that guided the marketplace and ensured that everyone benefited from…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith was an economist from the mid-late 1700’s and he was able to explain the knowledge of Capitalism; elaborating on how to make money from the free markets that was influential to survival at that time. He wrote a book, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which describes the origins of Capitalism in great details with petty examples of this logic set in motion. On the other side of the spectrum, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both produce a collaborative piece called The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticizes the bourgeoisie, and pushes for a lifestyle in which all property is government owned; eliminating the class system and having all people of the nation work for the same salary. There is a stark…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While Adam Smith battled that the best financial framework is private enterprise, Karl Marx suspected something. Adam Smith additionally restricted the possibility of upset to reestablish equity for the masses since he esteemed request and solidness over alleviation from persecution. Marx firmly clung to the possibility that free enterprise prompts to ravenousness and disparity. Intrinsic to the possibility of rivalry is insatiability, opined Karl Marx, which would bring about inborn flimsiness and treachery in a general public. Socialism offered the best model – both political and financial – with its collectivist possession, creation and focal arranging highlights proposed to circulate riches fairly and dispense with the qualifications between…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Industrial Revolution, occurring from 1760 to 1820, has permanently transformed the world, shifting it from manual labour into manufacturing; into a market-based economy. The Industrial Revolution birthed capitalism and its affects are still present today. A phenomenon this impactful has caught the interests of many economists, two of which being Adam Smith and Karl Marx. The two have very different opinions, with Smith arguing that the Industrial Revolution occurred because of a division of labour, every worker focussing on one specific task, and Marx arguing that machinery itself is what caused the Industrial Revolution. This essay will discuss their opposing views and compare Adam Smith’s An Inquiry Into Nature and the Causes of the Wealth of Nations – or The Wealth of Nations as it will be further referred to in this essay – with Karl Marx’s Capital.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophes changed the way people think and how society was. What was their main idea? The philosophes main idea was to have peace amongst one another. What was their main idea? Educated thinkers such as John Locke, Voltaire, Adam Smith and Mary Wollstonecraft made it evident we have natural rights.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The two theorists I will discuss are Adam Smith and Karl Marx, who are both very prominent for their ideas and theories. But are very different in their approach and views and both lived through very different times. Smith lived during the thriving industrial revolution in the 1700s while Marx lived in a bleak London with poor living conditions in the 1900s. Smith focused on the individual, one of his theories was the division of labour which was ground-breaking it has been used as a model in production ever since. For example, Ford motor factories in the 1920s used assembly lines which encompasses this theory.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli's Summary

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    PART A. IDENTIFICATIONS 3. “This division of labor, from which so many advantages are derived, is not originally the effect of any human wisdom…it is the necessary consequence of a certain propensity in human nature…to truck, barter and exchange one thing for another.” Adam Smith (pg.21) - In this quote, Adam Smith introduces the idea that although the specialization of skills in division of labor leads to efficiency when it comes to production, this is bad for the people because they lose other skills. People are so focused on their specialty that their other skills are not improved upon and start to deteriorate so they become good for one thing, their specialty.…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflicting Views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the Division of Labor and the Role of Money in Exchange In their works, Adam Smith and Karl Marx prove to have differing opinions on money and the division of labor. Although they understand money as a representation of value and as a medium of exchange, they arrive at different conclusions about the role of money in social life. Smith sees the division of labor as a constructive system and a means of furthering exchange, leading to the use of money. Marx, on the other hand, finds labor to turn human beings into alienated workers, and the division of labor to spread and increase this concept.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays