At multiple points, he makes arguments that aren't exactly realistic, but do prove his point quite well. One example is his opening sentence, “Socialism/communism represents the height of human arrogance.” This is a bold statement, but Wilburn uses it and the “Energy Independence and Security Act” to establish his credibility. These two examples are efforts to prove his knowledge of this subject. One lacking part of his ethos was his citation of sources. He has several quotes in the article but he doesn’t include a works cited or any references. This is a minor issue in his argument. I believe this is the weakest part of his
At multiple points, he makes arguments that aren't exactly realistic, but do prove his point quite well. One example is his opening sentence, “Socialism/communism represents the height of human arrogance.” This is a bold statement, but Wilburn uses it and the “Energy Independence and Security Act” to establish his credibility. These two examples are efforts to prove his knowledge of this subject. One lacking part of his ethos was his citation of sources. He has several quotes in the article but he doesn’t include a works cited or any references. This is a minor issue in his argument. I believe this is the weakest part of his