Adam I And Adam II: An Analysis

In reading the introduction and first two chapters of this text, I realized that much of what was discussed, encompassed thoughts that I’ve both previously and presently have. Brooks’ accordingly introduces the reader to Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik’s argument in that the two accounts of creation in Genesis represent the two opposing sides of our nature: Adam I and Adam II. Following this, the text describes Adam I as being the “career-oriented” and “ambiguous side of our nature,” wherein reading this, I instantly felt disconnect to this “side.” Admittedly, I assumed that this wasn’t a “good thing” as based on my experiences, people tend to appreciate and value those that live by an “inverse logic.” The first chapter discussed the shift of social values in America from “self-effacement” to “self-promotion.” In the least boastful way possible, I feel as though this isn’t necessarily true for me due to my background as a multicultural individual, which allows me to have a degree of community-focused humility. On the other hand, I can …show more content…
I further learned about Frances Perkins, a person who I shamelessly didn’t know about; however, it was intriguing to read that she found her vocation as an activist primarily via through her experience, in that the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire was a major event that defined her purpose of life. From this chapter, I was able to understand that individuals live in “context” and “our vocations find us.” Overall, this chapter activated my mind as I was consciously thinking how experiences can shape people. Based on my reading, I can conclude that the chapters of The Road to Character I’ve read thus far, might not be entirely “the accurate way of living,” however, the content of the book is definitely beneficial as it offered me an opportunity to think about my own