Active Euthanasi Helping Someone Die

Improved Essays
Is there a difference between helping someone die and letting someone die? This is the question central to the debate of whether there is a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is described as a physician helping a patient die that is in deep suffering, whereas passive euthanasia may be defined as a physician withholding treatment that would keep a dying patient alive for some amount of time. One can use the guiding principles in Immanuel Kant’s theory, referred to as Kantian deontology, and John Stuart Mill’s, utilitarianism, and how they would address ethical issues that arise when considering active euthanasia to better understand the moral debate surrounding the euthanasia issue. John Stuart Mill’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For James Rachels, as Barcalow says on page 252 of MP, “letting someone die is often no better from a moral point of view than killing someone.” Rachels challenges the view that killing someone, that is, via active euthanasia is far worse than letting someone die, that is, via passive euthanasia. Rachels thinks that sometimes even letting someone die can be far more worse than just outright killing them. To demonstrate his argument, Rachels gives a thought-experiment addressing this issue.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is morally good to respect a person’s autonomy as well as the wishes of a patient whom has indicated their intent in wanting to not continue their suffering, perhaps as expressed with a DNR order. In the instance of a patient on life support, they can request to be taken off of these life-supporting machines, and die; a case of passive euthanasia. In his article “Active and Passive Euthanasia”, author James Rachels argues that from a moral standpoint, there is no difference between active and passive euthanasia or killing someone and letting someone die. For Rachels, the decision of inaction is an action in it of itself, and overall the outcome of both is ultimately the same: the death of the patient, although active euthanasia is more merciful to the patient (Rachels). Bailey experiences a loss of autonomy in functioning as a human being without aid from others.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discussions regarding physician aid-in-dying (PAD), physician assisted-suicide (PAS), and euthanasia are often presented as ethically and morally questionable topics. In order to truly assess the ethical and public health concerns surrounding them we must establish clear definitions, critically evaluate the ethical models that apply to each, and we must analyze the arguments against their legitimization as healthcare measures. Teasing apart the ethical implications of this topic requires clear definitions. The terms aid-in-dying, assisted-suicide, and euthanasia are frequently used interchangeably, even amongst healthcare personnel.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Is physician-assisted suicide, with regards to the elderly or the terminally ill just? Should we allow the assisted death of individuals based on these variables? In this paper, we will seek to expound this question as well as apply it to the ethical theory of utilitarianism. There are two doctrines that can be used to evaluate this issue on whether it is entirely ethical or unethical. On one side of the argument, physician-assisted suicide is deemed as a way of relieving the suffering of others before an inevitable death.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assisted Death can be seen as a controversial subject because it begs the question of what is death and how valuable life is. Death is seen as a taboo subject because no living person officially knows what occurs or what it actually is. The only common outlook on death is that everyone will eventually die. With this misconstrued idea of death, the topic of assisted death becomes confusing. Religion, perspective and circumstances shape my view towards assisted death.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The discussion on physician-assisted death (PAD) and euthanasia has been fenced with controversy whether by the media or in philosophy. Considerably, the arguments that surround this issue has increased periodically due to the fact that health care and medicine has evolved continuously to safeguard not just patients and families, but all health care providers as well. Physician assisted death is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Westefeld et al., 2013, p. 539). Oftentimes, PAD is erroneously used interchangeably with euthanasia. According to Dieterle, euthanasia occurs when the active instigator of death is the physician.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons behind Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted suicide (PAS) claim that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death (Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?). The right to die is every human’s choice. Choosing Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide can provide a terminally ill patient with a good end. It can also make it easier on the patients’ family knowing that they chose that it was their time to go. When choosing Euthanasia, the patient is showing strength and dignity.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, it will be argued that there is a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. The distinction is that active euthanasia is the direct involvement of action that cause someone to die. However, passive euthanasia is the inaction of allowing someone to die by not doing something that would prolong the patient’s life. I cannot agree with James Rachel argument of “the bare difference between killing and letting die does not, in itself, make a moral difference,” because killing in active euthanasia and letting one die in passive euthanasia can be differentiate in the notion of the principle cause, intent, and motive of the action vs inaction (Vaughn, 2017).…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defeat this belief and undermine such closed minded views, I will raise an argument against active euthanasia in hopes to encourage doctors and other individuals to reconsider their current thoughts. Although, one might disagree with Rachels stance, I agree with his argument because there is no significant moral difference between passive and active euthanasia as the person will presume to be deceased after all. Thus, making his argument consistent and the doctrine, active euthanasia, just as justifiable and permissible as passive euthanasia. In some cases, it is permissible to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action intended to kill the patient. Not only is this view adopted by most doctors, but it is accepted in the American Medical Association statement: “…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As defined by Susan M. Wolf, “euthanasia is the practice of intentionally and directly ending the life of a person who has a severe and incurable disease or medical condition” (Wolf). Euthanasia usually takes place in patients with terminal illnesses, that ask to be euthanized. There are six major subtypes of euthanasia: active, passive, voluntary, involuntary, indirect, and assisted suicide (“BBC - Ethics- Euthanasia: Forms of Euthanasia”). In a society where euthanasia is legal, the “Law of the Jungle” takes effect.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical philosophers such as Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill, describe three separate moral beliefs that each propose a different view on an individual’s right to autonomy. Aristotle was against euthanasia, due to his theory of virtue ethics and aiming to achieve morally correctness. Immanuel Kant was not concerned with consequences, but rather intentions. If euthanasia was an ethical response, then it would be regarded as a good act. John Stuart Mill supported euthanasia, for his ethical theory dictates that so long as an action is not causing harm to anyone else, it is admissible.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays