RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 1: Relationship between Achievement Motivation and Aggression among Inter Collegiate Hockey Players
Variable N M SD df r
Achievement Motivation
100 26.28 5.72
98
-0.09
Vs.
Aggression 11.15 2.58 rtab (98) = 0.19
It is apparent from the table 1 that obtained value of correlation coefficient (-0.09) is less than the tabulated value of correlation coefficient (0.19). It means there is no significant relationship found between achievement motivation and aggression [rtab (98) = 0.19, p > .05]. of inter-collegiate level hockey players.
Table 2: Relationship between Achievement Motivation and Social Adjustment among Inter Collegiate Hockey Players
Variable N M SD df r
Achievement Motivation 26.28 5.72
Vs. 100 98 -0.10 …show more content…
Table 7: Relationship between Achievement Motivation and Aggression among All India Intervarsity Hockey Players
Variable N M SD df r
Achievement Motivation 26.68 5.99
Vs. 100 98 0.24*
Aggression 12.56 2.98 *Significant at .05 level rtab (98) = 0.19
It is apparent from the table 7 that All India Intervarsity players have significant relationship between achievement motivation and aggression [rtab (98) = 0.19, p < .05].
Table 8: Relationship between Achievement Motivation and Social Adjustment among All India Intervarsity Hockey Players
Variable N M SD df r
Achievement Motivation 26.68 5.99
Vs. 100 98 0.04
Social Adjustment 7.48 2.61 rtab (98) = 0.19
Table 8 indicates that calculated r value (0.04) is less than the tabulated r value (0.19) that means all india intervarsity players have no significant relationship between achievement motivation and social adjustment [rtab (98) = 0.19, p >