According To The Treatise Of Zera Yacob: Reason And Faith

Superior Essays
According to the Treatise of Zera Yacob, reason and faith do not conflict. As a matter of fact, reason and faith are supportive of one another in that his faith in God has allowed him to delve deeper into the idea of God and the arguments for and against the type of God he is and if there even is a God. He believed that God allowed him to reason and to learn more about his own beliefs and the thoughts of people around the world. His perspective is a rare one in that it is commonly believed that reason leads to a lack of faith and eventually a form of atheism. The pursuit of scientific knowledge normally leads to a lack of faith due to a newfound belief in the tangible and a loss of belief in the intangible. However, for Zera Yacob, his pursuit …show more content…
According to the Treatise, Zera Yacob could live according to his own beliefs in God while still being able to pursue reason due to the gifts that God gave him and the belief that his own gift of reason would lead him to a stronger faith and better understanding of the ability of man. Zera Yacob was a bright student in his youth which led his father to sending him to receive a higher education. It was here that he realized that God was with him on his journey to understand reason. He had multiple experiences in which he believed that God allowed him to continue to do his research and to expand his understanding of the unknown. God first saved him from a depression that he went into after being made fun of for his voice. He was saved again when he fell into a deep ravine that would have killed someone without the intervention of God. He viewed these experiences as God’s intervention so that he may continue to learn about reason and why it can be complementary to faith rather than contradictory. He continued to …show more content…
This can be inferred from the vast difference in beliefs between religions and the differences in morality between them. Each religion has different standards for evil yet they all are meant to worship the same God. Therefore, the line between good and evil is man-made which means that evil is not from God but a source of man’s own free will that is based in the decisions that have been made throughout history by powerful figures. Since God cannot make evil things, he made man who had the ability to obey and disobey God’s law. The example used is the example of an alternate creation story in which God never tells Adam and Eve not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. By doing so, they are never able to utilize their free will because they have no order to disobey, therefore never being able to truly become free beings. By giving the command not to eat from the Tree, they are suddenly presented with a choice and therefore they are presented with free will. This decision was presented to man and it allows man to reason and come to their own conclusions about God. It also allows scripture to be a method for God to propose questions allowing man to reason for

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    (16)(A) An explanation that I reject comes from Rachels Evil and is the idea that evil is the result of a person’s wrongdoing. I do believe that people should be and are punished for doing wrong but the punishment is not always something that fits the crime. Some people who commit small crimes receive worse punishments then those who commit worse crimes. You would expect God to hand out punishments fairly but he does not.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Adam and Eve were “free to eat from any tree in the garden; but [they] must not eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil” (Genesis 2:16-17). In the beginning, they were completely fine with obeying these laws. However, just as Gene was enticed to hurt Finny, Adam and Eve were drawn to eat from the Forbidden Fruit. They were tempted by the devil in serpent form. The serpent informs Adam and Eve that God did not want them to eat the fruit because “when [they] eat from it [their] eyes will be open, and [they] will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5).…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His loss in faith begins when he starts doubting God and in some way blaming him for his losses and suffering. But he did try to stay faithful to his faith but, it just keeps going downhill and just not getting positive. He probably felt like God had given up on him due to lack of progress. Its hard to have faith in something when your doubting whether its there or not. After all of that his faith begins to weaken even more because it moves on to his loss of faith in humanity.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The authors attempt to defend the integrity of the Bible in the face of the problem of evil, but their argument contradicts the Bible on many occasions. I believe that the authors’ first inconsistency has to do with…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Take the Holocaust for example, millions of Jews were slaughtered and tortured. God could teach us evil by something else that causes less suffering and cruelty, but yet did not. This brings us back to the problem of evil because this infers that God is not wholly good. Again, this solution only solves the problem of evil by editing one of the propositions to where it…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout Augustine and Evodius’s conversation, it is understood that evil has “two senses: one, of doing evil, and the other, of suffering evil” while God is not the cause of doing evil (Augustine 35). Having God not being the cause of doing evil and only suffering evil, there must be another source as, “ there is no single cause, but everyone who does wrong if the cause of his own wrongdoing” (Augustine, 35). Due to this, as individuals we are responsible for our own misdeeds. This concept has lead to the establishment of laws, which are created in order to prevent something that is already wrong such as adultery, murder and sacrilege (Augustine, 39). It is human nature to sin and it is hoped that knowledge is gained from those experiences in order to later establish a better decision..…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Genesis is established as being the beginning of everything and being all good but there is also the portrayal and interpretation of evil in the creation. In the genesis of evil, Dr. Altizer explains that the origin of evil is “unknown and as orthodox as the origin of god” (Altizer 80). The journal explains how Genesis contains several indirect interpretations of the portrayal of evil in genesis. One of the first interpretations of evil is seen when Adam and Eve sinned in Eden and turned away from God causing them to bring sin to the world. Dr. Altizer explains that this concept is true but it absolves God from bringing evil into the world to hold it as Adam and Eve introducing evil into the world.…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil and Omnipotence In Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. The fourth fallacious solution (S4), claims that moral evil is necessary in any world containing the overriding good of human freedom. In this paper, I will demonstrate: (I) S4; (II) Mackie’s objection of S4; (III) A primary benefit of Mackie’s argument; and (IV) Why Mackie’s criticism succeeds. (I) S4:…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In East of Eden, John Steinbeck communicates the reliance of the human soul on free will to establish itself, which proves to be true to an extent, but, considering a Christian worldview, other variables such as God’s image, original sin, and forgiveness influence the human soul’s construction. Steinbeck attempts the challenging task of exploring the enigmatic basis of humanity, ultimately reasoning the human soul requires free will in order to exist. While I argue that Steinbeck does not succeed in presenting the complete image of the human soul, he captures essential components of it through valid arguments concerning “original sin” in relation to free will. It is evident that Cathy’s bestial identity potentially resides within Cal.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished. We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument from evil argues and targets against a specific type of god which is argued to be all powerful, knowing, and good. The argument states that if such God were to exist, then we would not have evil in the world. Yet, all around us we see evil and therefore God cannot exist. The argument from evil is a reductio ad absurdum argument because we take on the fact that there is evil in the world and because of this, derive the conclusion that an all-pkg God cannot exist. An important thing to note is that the argument does not argue your concept of what God is but rather shows how an all-pkg God cannot exist.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the beginning, God gave man free will. Every human had the chance to choose good or evil, but more importantly than that, each had the choice to define what was good and what was evil. But humans, they had a tendency to polarize the world into what is right, what is wrong, what can, and what cannot be done. Here is man’s problem: Timshel, the idea that humans are not predestined and right and wrong are not stagnant, was replaced by strict mundane social and political constructs which inhibit free will and self-determination. In East of Eden, through a positive representation of non-traditional relationships, demonstrated by Adam and Lee in combination with the negative traditional relationship of Adam and Cathy, John Steinbeck emphasizes…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He allowed them to have free-will to choose because he had a plan for mankind. After the Fall, Adam and Eve are sent out of the Garden, but they leave on a hopeful note because they have been given the knowledge of what is to come in man’s future. They know that a Savior is coming to forgive them and their descendants of their sin, so they take heart in the greatest…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that God allows evil to exist for reasons that we do not understand, but I also believe that he was not the one who created it. I believe that God created man, and that man created evil. According to the bible, God The reason as to why God allows evil may never be known, but others have arrived at the conclusion that God must want to teach people a lesson. Another theory is that he literally cannot or will not do anything to stop evil from happening because he gave us free will. Regardless as to why he allows it to happen, the bible states that he will judge Earth’s inhabitants and he will at this time banish evil forever.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays