Accepting The Crutch In The Pat

In the above conversation the patient shows the disagreement regarding the crutch that the therapist mentioned to buy as a part of his treatment program. When the therapist ask about buying crutch the patient illustrates the concept of indirect speech acts. Speech acts may be direct or indirect. The indirect speech act of not buying the crutch by mentionioning walker is enough or crutch is not necessary and the lack of money may be the illocutionary force and perlocutionary effect not changing the assistant aid for walking, ie, obstruction to the patient level of independence.
The patient may have be the interest to comply with the treatment protocol; however some other factor hindering him to buy the crutch, which seems to be essential for