Acca P1 Past Exam Paper

2354 Words Nov 27th, 2015 10 Pages
高 ac 顿 ca 财
.g 经 ao A du CC
n. A cn Professional
Accountant

Paper P1

Professional Level – Essentials Module

Monday 10 December 2007

Time allowed
Reading and planning:
Writing:

15 minutes
3 hours

This paper is divided into two sections:

Section A – This ONE question is compulsory and MUST be attempted
Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted

Do NOT open this paper until instructed by the supervisor.
During reading and planning time only the question paper may be annotated. You must NOT write in your answer booklet until instructed by the supervisor.
This question paper must not be removed from the examination hall.

The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants

Section A – This ONE
…show more content…
This knowledge underpins market confidence and keeps our customers supplied with the inventory they need. You can trust our reserve reports – our reputation depends on it!’

高 ac 顿 ca 财
.g 经 ao A du CC
n. A cn 1

At the board meeting, the head of the geological survey department, Ranjana Tyler, reported that there was a problem with the latest report because one of the major reserve figures had recently been found to be wrong. The mineral in question, mallerite, was WM’s largest mineral in volume terms and Ranjana explained that the mallerite reserves in a deep mine in a certain part of the world had been significantly overestimated. She explained that, based on the interim minerals report, the stock market analysts were expecting WM to announce known mallerite reserves of
4·8 billion tonnes. The actual figure was closer to 2·4 billion tonnes. It was agreed that this difference was sufficient to affect WM’s market value, despite the otherwise good results for the past year. Vanda Monroe, the finance director, said that the share price reflects market confidence in future earnings. She said that an announcement of an incorrect estimation like that for mallerite would cause a reduction in share value. More importantly for WM itself, however, it could undermine confidence in the geological survey department. All agreed that as this was strategically

Related Documents