Academic Cheating Book Review

815 Words 4 Pages
Psychology of Academic Cheating. According to Anderman and Murdock (2007), Academic Cheating is extremely common in educational institutions. Cheating undermines the use of assessment data as both indicators of student learning and as sources of feedback to teachers for instructional planning. Although cheating appears to increase as students move through the K-12 school system, no age group is exempt from acts of academic dishonesty. Academic Cheating can be viewed from a number of disciplinary and theoretical perspectives. Cheating in School. As Stated by Davis, Drinan, and Gallant (2009), This book serves as a roadmap to help those concerned about student cheating by identifying obstacles and nasty curves in the road, as well as the possibilities …show more content…
Assessment in practice focuses upon good assessment practice, building on ideas and examples from the previous two sections. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. In a manner corresponding to Falchikov (2005), This book is about how students have been, are, and may be involved assessment and It is for anyone in further or higher education to improve the practice of assessment generally or to provide students with as rich an educational experience as possible. Cheating on test is informally written using a minimum of professional jargon and numerous anecdotes and cases. Technical information is largely confined to end-of-book appendices. It will appeal to all serous stakeholders in our educational system from parents and school members to professionals directly connected to our schools and the testing industry. The university at the undergraduate level sounds like a place where cheating comes almost as naturally as breathing, where it is an academic skill almost as important as reading, writing, math. Everyone hates exams. And there’s nothing worse than staring blankly at an exam paper knowing you can’t answer the …show more content…
Because many people with high self-esteem exaggerate their successes and good traits, we emphasize objective measures of outcomes. High elf-esteem is also a heterogeneous category, encompassing people who frankly accept their good qualities along with narcissistic, defensive, and conceited individuals. The modest correlations between self-esteem and school performance do not indicate that high self-esteem leads to good performance. Instead, high self-esteem is partly the result of good school performance. If efforts to boost self-esteem of pupils have not been shown to improve academic performance and may sometimes be counterproductive. Job performance in adults is sometimes related to self-esteem, although the correlations vary widely, and the direction of causality has not been established. Occupational success may boost self-esteem Rather than the reverse. Alternatively, self-esteem may be helpful only in some job contexts. Laboratory studies have generally failed to find self-esteem causes good task performance, with the important exception that high self-esteem facilitates persistence after

Related Documents