Absolute War Analysis

Superior Essays
War throughout history has been limited as opposed to absolute. Limited war by its nature is the opposite of absolute war, and absolute war is a theory that fails as a construct. This essay discusses the two groups or types of war (absolute and limited) and the category subsets of those two groups that Carl von Clausewitz first discussed in his treatise On War.
Categories of war, as defined by Carl von Clausewitz, are absolute war, ideal war, limited war, real war, war to disarm the enemy, war of limited objectives, and war to overthrow the enemy. These categories fall into two groups; absolute war (which contains absolute war) and limited war (which contains ideal war – related to absolute war, real war, war to disarm the enemy, war of
…show more content…
Absolute war is the premise that all means available, to include all personnel that can wield a weapon, all equipment, all weapons (to include weapons of mass destruction) will all be used at the same time to completely destroy the enemy. This construct of war is not only improbable, it is impossible and ultimately fails as a construct. Clausewitz struggled with the definition and theory of absolute war throughout all books in his treatise On War.
It appears almost entirely in Book VIII, “War Plans,” but his discussion of it there is experimental—probing and inconsistent. It arises in Chapter 2 and soars in Chapters 3.A and 3.B, but comes into serious question even in 3.B. It receives fundamental criticism in Chapter 6.B, and thereafter disappears from view as the limited aim—which he previously in the same book had treated disdainfully under a different label— comes into serious consideration. Ultimately, Clausewitz dropped the term
…show more content…
To triumph within a conflict, the side who will eventually win must either disarm the enemy or wear one’s adversary down to the point that the adversary is unable or unwilling to fight. The second category of war Clausewitz defines is ideal war. “Ideal war is a philosophical abstraction, a "logical fantasy" that is impossible to achieve in reality. It is war in a "pure" form, violence at its most extreme, unrestrained by intelligent forces or by the frictional effects of time, space, and human nature.” Real war is simply war as it happens and how combatants enact war. A war of limited objectives is defined by the statement; it is a war to obtain defined and stated objectives, many times in the form of small gains to accomplish a larger goal. Similarly, a war to overthrow the enemy defines itself; overthrow a leader of a state or country to further a state’s or nation’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ap World War Dbq Analysis

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War is the father of all things”. The policy led to countries having a more accepting attitude towards war as well as public support. This meant that countries would be more inclined to start a war, and citizens would support them if they did. The…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Americans have been fascinated with the concept of war for centuries. War has evolved from a last resort into an opportunity for America to prove its superiority against other countries, and to instill fear within the nation. In short, war is a grandiose weapon. In the novel, The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War, Andrew J. Bacevich discusses the relationship that has existed and continues to exist between America and war. Although Bacevich is able to pinpoint a plethora of explanations as to how militarism has evolved into what it is now, he does not present a clear thesis.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Walter Wink’s article “Beyond Just War and Pacifism” he does not believe war should ever be justified. He gave a helpful understanding for the complexity and opacity of human violence. In a broader view Wink sees a hidden dimension not apart from physical reality and human society but grounded within the social world. Wink calls this hidden reality “The domain of the Powers”. Wink argues that war can never be just because justice requires fairness on both sides and war there could never be that.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay, three reasons from the Just War Theory will be used to outline the vindication of the war; they are legitimate authority, possessing right intention, and reasonable chance of…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Only humans have seemed to adopt warfare as the primary way of resolving a conflict. In the Western world, we develop strategy and improve upon the weapons used to fight. We create institutions to study war. It is clear that…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the fourth edition of Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer, Walzer discusses the crime, logic, rules, morals of soldiers, and finally the war convention. As discussed in the previous reading, Holsti also addresses the logic and war convention that must take place at the end of each war in order to ensure more satisfaction between the two sides in battle. Waltzer states that is is possible to fight a just war unjustly and for an unjust war to be fought in strict accordance to the laws of war. The author throughout this reading talks about how war is a crime. Walzer asks, "why is it wrong to start a war?”…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Margaret Meade On War

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In Margaret Meade’s article on war, she explains how war is spread throughout different parts of the world and also among different cultures. Meade argues the idea of war, its benefits, and others’ opinions vary among different civilizations. Most people believe that war is a necessity in order to survive because of the destructive behavior and rivalry from other countries. There are civilizations that view war as something to be proud of and many of their people become ambitious to fight. However, other people argue that war is something unwelcomed and was only invented in order to defend themselves against any trouble.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    And the cost of war should be economically accessed to determine if there are enough assets to complete the goal. Therefore, “Some political theorists have maintained that the concept itself of “justice” in warfare is irrelevant: once the state-to-state violence starts, the domain of justice is left irrevocably behind, and only force matters, until a new power equilibrium is reached, and on its foundation the domain of peacetime justice is then reestablished.” (Bess, p.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When examining Clausewitz idea of “war is the mere continuation of politics by other means” I found that within the first sentence of the paragraph holds an important context. Clausewitz states “a carrying out of the same by other means.” Both this idea and statement hold true in regards to U.S. military action post 9/11. The “continuation of politics” lies within policy in regards to diplomacy, economic, or other means. During war time these politics continue but employed in a different manner.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War is a period in time consisting of hostile and brutal relations among countries whose only option for resolution is violent fighting among armed forces. For as long as anyone can remember, a lot of disagreements among countries result into war. War dates back millenniums ago and is still a present issue up to this day. However, there needs to be a put a permanent stop to war because of cost, effects on soldiers, and it lacks of morality.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who Won The Vietnam War

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War has ended the persecution of other for centuries. The importance of war is shown by the freedom of those around you and abroad. Without war countries would be nothing but colonies, ruled by a more powerful nation with an iron fist. Different races would no longer exist because nothing would be done to help them. War is what keeps tyranny and persecution in check.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    French Resistence Quotes

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This war has two sides and both sides are shown as good and bad. The author intends to switch perspectives to convey the true sadness and unnecessary means of war…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even before World War One, the desire to abolish the cycle of war was apparent in civilized society. This was made apparent by William James with his essay “The Moral Equivalent of War”. In his essay, James argues through anecdotes and multiple viewpoints that another method besides warfare should be used to advance civilization. James utilizes perspective throughout his essay to strengthen his argument through an ethos appeal. Throughout his work, he consistently acknowledges two parties: pacifists and advocates of war.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays