Abraham Lincoln's Objective In The Civil War

Improved Essays
Abraham Lincoln’s primary objective in the Civil War was to at all costs, preserve the Union. This meant that the Confederacy needed to be destroyed. A tactic employed by Lincoln to weaken the southern cause and give the northerners a huge advantage was the installment of the Emancipation Proclamation in September of 1862 after the Battle of Antietam. This battle was significant in precipitating emancipation because of the amount of casualties it recorded. Over twenty thousand soldiers died in a single day. Lincoln saw this and being the pragmatic unionist he was, he sought to rid the root cause of the Civil War in order to ensure a disaster like this never repeated itself. He found that slavery was the fundamental reason why the war started …show more content…
In other words, he was not a true abolitionist at heart. Rather, he was a limited abolitionist motivated by pragmatic unionist beliefs. Yes, he chose to emancipate the slaves, but that doesn’t automatically make him an abolitionist. First of all, the Emancipation Proclamation was a side effect of achieving his primary objective in the war, which was to preserve the Union. If he could’ve saved the Union without the emancipation, he would’ve done it. But because of the disadvantages the Union was facing at the time, he need to go through with the emancipation to guarantee the northern victory and ensure that the Union as a whole was kept intact. Also, the emancipation didn’t remove slavery from all the states. It only had an effect in Confederate areas still under rebellion. For the border states and all the areas conquered by the Union throughout the war, slavery was legal. Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was much more of a proclamation than that of an emancipation. Still, Abraham Lincoln was very brave by deciding to end slavery in most of south. He knew the proclamation was going to receive a lot of criticism, but not only did it win the war for the Union, but it brought recognition to blacks and their rights. That is why many consider him as good a president as George

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Giving them New Hampshire would have been ideal because that way they could start their own society without color prejudice. Having a designated black state would also give them the right to vote and have other basic human rights that they were not receiving. This never ended up happening. Slavery was a terrible curse on God’s creatures. Lincoln winning the 1864 election did more than just ensuring no compromise with the South.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The republican tried to solve problems without violence at first before such measures. During the war blacks enter the army to help the north. This was an advantage for the north because they had people who were passionate for what they were fighting for. At first Lincoln try not to use his power as commander and chief to issue the emancipation of slaves but at the end he did when he was reelected. The radicals finally got what they long proceeded for.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Abraham Lincoln proposed the Emancipation Proclamation, it was more of a noble act of morality than it was a violation of the states rights. Lincoln knew that the best course of action, and the choice with the most moral standing, was freeing the slaves. Or, at least, clearing the way for the emancipation process to begin and gradually abolishing slavery. Even though the reason that Lincoln proposed the proclamation was to get states to return to the Union, he still believed that slavery was wrong. Lincoln knew that it was an evil idea and wanted to make sure that it did not spread any more than it already has.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was one of the bloodiest wars in the history of the nations, this war not only shaped the nation, but it changed the face of America by abolishing slavery. Tension began to rise in the territories whether or not to permit slavery west of Mississippi, this became controversial because both the North and the South viewed this in a different perspective. The South was pro-slavery and they believed that it maintained their economy. Slaves helped them cultivate the land and made it easier for the southerners. In contrast, the North was against slavery and they believed that slaves were not needed, the North depended on manufacture and industrial work.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gary W. Gallagher didn’t believe that the war was over slavery but, that the war was over the Union. He provided solid evidence on why he believed that the Civil War was not over slavery but over the Union. I provided evidence also that joined Gary W. Gallagher that the war’s primary focus was the Union. The war was fought for the Union but, the Union attacked slavery because they knew that slavery was a dominant tool that the Confederates used. Moreover, if the war was fought over slavery then slavery would’ve ended when the war did not months after.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leaders of the south wanted to keep slavery and they went to war over it. Also, Livingston may have reversed “myth” to far by saying that the South was less egregious towards Blacks than the North. With men like Confederate Vice President Alexander H. Stephens who said, “slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and moral condition” (72) gives foundation for the great depravity in the slaveholder’s mind. What seems to be clear, is that slavery and prejudice was not a North or South issue; rather it is what it has always been—a humanity issue. Livingston is correct.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    . .”(Gates 2). History reveals several speeches where Lincoln remains reticent on slavery but does however appear to be racist in many lights. If not motivated from being a human rights activist, why did Lincoln risk an entire nation and countless lives to eradicate slavery in the South? After winning the Presidency, Abraham Lincoln immediately faced a monumental challenge as Commander-in-chief.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Abraham Lincoln won the 1860 presidential election, running opposing slavery, Southern states began seceding from the Union, which touched off the Civil War. Many people from the South today claim that the Confederacy and the division cause were not all about slavery and racism. In the Civil War, however, leaders were much more honest about their thoughts. They believed that blacks were inferior to whites. They also believed that slavery was a good thing.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the Civil War was not a fight to free these slaves, and is too commonly mistaken as such. The use of emancipation of slaves was used during the war strictly as a weapon, by both the Union and Confederacy, to gain an upper hand in the war. This tactical use of freedom can be seen as wrong, and whether or not it is morally right, it did in fact greatly influence the outcome of the civil war. Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation secured Union victory, and was in all aspects a pivotal moment in Americas…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This war did not only accomplish the abolishment of slavery, it accomplished union in the states, kept a strong country growing together In the election of 1860 Abraham Lincoln ran for president and when on to become the first republican candidate to win an election. However, his election meant bad new for the southern states that were dependent on agriculture and used slavery for their advantage to obtain higher profits. According to the book America past and present, “By…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays