Abraham Lincoln does a better job explaining the significance of the Battle of Gettysburg’s casualties. Lincoln motivates current and future listeners in a positive manner. The writer of the critical review of the gettysburg address on the other hand spends his time criticizing the president rather then focusing in the significance of the battle of casualties.
The president’s speech is motivating compared to the writer’s review. For example: when Abraham Lincoln states is for the living to finish the work that the casualties started and honorably died for it makes me feel like im doing something good for my country. Why in the other hand the writer of the second reading is not motivating because is focused on the past.
Another reason
The president’s speech is motivating compared to the writer’s review. For example: when Abraham Lincoln states is for the living to finish the work that the casualties started and honorably died for it makes me feel like im doing something good for my country. Why in the other hand the writer of the second reading is not motivating because is focused on the past.
Another reason