Abraham Lincoln's Definition Of A Hero

“We need superheroes to tackle problems that are too though for mere mortals to handle.” There are two types of heroes, fictional and non-fictional one might be more of a true hero in today’s times. Fictional heroes’ selflessness along with their superpowers makes them the truest form of a hero. Fictional heroes are considered the truest form of heroes in today’s society due to their selflessness. Abraham Lincoln was a non-fiction hero but he showed almost no signs of selflessness unless it was for personal growth.”…-he refrained from supporting anti-slavery measures throughout his early life and early presidency.”(“How Does Time Shape Our View Of Heroes?”) Abraham Lincoln only put his thoughts before the lives of other suffering people and that’s something Superman or any fictional characters would do. Equally important was how Gilgamesh only did the quest for his personal gains and fame. “My name will not endure without brave deeds”, said Gilgamesh, ‘and therefore let us go into the Cedar Forest to win fame.’”(“The Slaying of Humbaba”) Gilgamesh won’t do much for the people who need the help but he will try to look heroic for himself. The fictional …show more content…
The fictional heroes may have weaknesses but we really need that in our heroes to show us they are real people. “They can be flawed, we need them to be flawed. Part of their appeal is that we can relate to them, despite being superheroes.” (“Why Are We Obsessed With Superheroes?”) It really doesn’t matter if they are some alien humans like to relate it can be external or internal and mistakes are very common and relatable in humans. Superheroes not only solve political or economic problems like most non-fictional heroes but social problems also. “We need superheroes to tackle problems that are too though for mere mortals to handle.” (“Why Are We Obsessed With Superheroes?”) Fictional heroes are selfless so they will help with any social problems they