Abraham Lincoln A House Divided Analysis

Improved Essays
“House Divided”
“A house divided against itself cannot stand”. Abraham Lincoln was a major influential individual in the late 1850’s early 60’s. He had strong morals and beliefs and rose to conquer what he knew was unacceptable in society. Lincoln was affiliated with the Whig party which would later become to the Republican party. On June 16, 1858 in Springfield, Illinois Abraham Lincoln delivered his “House Divided” speech that left a lasting impression on many Americans. He was a firm believer in that slavery was evil to man kind and the ideas of it could not coexist morally, socially, or legally. He delivered this speech when he was running against Stephen Douglas for the U.S. Senate. Lincoln had recently accepted the Illinois Republican
…show more content…
With territory expanding westward he feared that slavery would expand as well and corrupt America. Quoted from his speech Lincoln says, "A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe the government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.” This is a well known figure of speech referring to the New Testament. In this direct quote he clearly states that by having a split country will lead to chaos and further corruption. When Lincoln talks about the House he is referring to the Union. His main goal was to preserve the Union and protect the freedom of slaves. He believes that as a country slavery needs to be abolished or continued as a whole. He also realized that only the federal Government had the power to end slavery. Lincoln feared that after the recent supreme court decision of the Dred Scott case would slavery would become legal in every state. Specifically, in Lincolns speech he states, “…what Dred Scott’s master might Lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free State of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or one thousand slaves in Illinois, or in any other free State.” His respect of Dred Scott and other slaves in shown

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    DiLorenzo explains that Lincoln had the opportunity to free slaves, but he did not take advantage of the situation. It is also revealed that Lincoln went against what he had originally stated about slavery. In his inaugural address, Lincoln shared that he had no constitutional authority to alter the use of slaves. He was at the point where he was thinking of ignoring the words of the constitution. He was ready to take a more dictatorial role among the people.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln was part of the Republican party, who publicly advocated against slavery, and his win in the election brought fear from the South to fruition. The divide was clear between the North and South, and the only thing for Southerners to do is implement it, through secession. Secession was imminent but they didn’t…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This also caused many fights to happen because Missourians went to Kansas and/or Nebraska to make them slave states. In document four, Lincoln talks about how the great debate of slavery will divide the country. Lincoln predicted that the country would be even more divided after the Kansas-Nebraska act. He also talked about how the country could be either all slave or all…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lincoln was not a well known politician when he was running for Senate, he became known more when he began challenging Douglas to debates. Lincoln opposed the idea of expanding slavery. During a speech at Alton, Illinois, he argued that slavery not only impacts politics, but also many religions, literature, and morals. He reasoned that, slavery divided the society “Is it not this same mighty, deep-seated power that somehow operates on the minds of men, exciting and stirring them up in every avenue of society – in politics, in religion, in literature, in morals, in all manifold relations in life?” (Document G).…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13th Amendment Dbq

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With him speaking his mind about how much he disliked slavery it opened many eyes and thoughts about this issue. When Lincoln was elected as president many different states voted to succeed from the United States starting with South Carolina. When South Carolina left 12 other states followed behind. The real reason for the successions was because the southern states saw the government changing and they believed it was a threat against the rights of their states. Soon the successions led to the civil war, and during the war the formation of the 13th amendment was forming.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lincoln had a " bold and unchanging opposition to slavery" (Stone 5) that drove him to try and ahieve ending it in America. Eventually he did but it took alot of time and even after many people in the nation still didn't agree with what he had done. He had to then deal with the Civil War between the north and south. Soon after he "made an the end of slavery permanent" (Stone 7).…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During his first term, Lincoln had many issues at hand, one of which being the fugitive slaves who were escaping into the North. He and other Union officials were debating whether to keep the slaves as confiscated property and “contrabands” of war, or return them back to the rebellious states, in accordance with the Fugitive Slave Act (Doc A). Another issue he faced was whether to grant freedom to the slaves in both the North and the South or keep them enslaved. While he stated that he wouldn’t free a single slave if that meant saving the Union, his view soon changed. In 1861 and 1862, Congress passed the Confiscation Acts, stating that Union forces would be allowed to confiscate any property from the Confederate states, and as slaves were considered property, they were taken as well.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is a major part of U.S. History regardless of the negative reflection it puts on the United States. Slavery divided politicians, as well as states. Slavery was not the reason for the Civil War in the beginning, but it was always a main factor of the war, especially after the Emancipation Proclamation was introduced. In the article, “A Man but Not a Brother: Abraham Lincoln and Racial Equality”, by George M. Fredrickson, writes about Lincoln and his stance on slavery. Fredrickson records that Lincoln never really took a stance on slavery throughout his politician career, that he would have views for both against slavery and for slavery at times.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason Lincoln wanted to end slavery was to unite the union for the future. Lincoln believed that the issue of slavery would be an obstacle for the future of our country. Lincoln worked to unite our country and that is what lead to the Thirteenth Amendment to the constitution. Lincoln wanted slavery abolished because he foresaw it as a problem to the future of America. Lincoln thought that if slavery remained in America one day America might divide over slavery.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln stated that the point of his debates was not to abolish slavery in the old southern states but to stop it from spreading to the newer territories acquired in the…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln made and signed emancipation proclamation, but he didn’t do it for all the slaves to be free, he actually did it as a military move, to win the war. It only freed the slaves that have seceded from the union, so there were still states with slaves in them. And he didn’t give the slaves the rights of a white man yet, he just freed them and made them citizens. He just wanted to defeat the south so, he took away their “property”(aka the slaves) so that it would be easier to truly defeat the south, this was also after they won a battle so, it didn’t make Mr. Lincoln look “weak”. He didn’t want to interfere with slavery, he only did it as a military…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the slaves who would later be freed returned to similar lifestyles proving that Lincoln issued the proclamation as a way of weakening the force of the Confederacy. Lincoln could also be argued to not be a Great Emancipator due to his views of freed slaves. One was him being a supporter of colonization of freed slaves. Lincoln may have supported the freedom of slaves, but he also believed that a multiracial nation would be worse off as he describes his ideas on colonization “that neither races nor individuals shall have suffered by the change, it will indeed be a glorious consummation.” (Eulogy of Henry Clay)…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disagreements in political decisions became a large dividing factor between the North and the South, along with the growing disagreements between the North and the South in ideology. Even from the founding of the country the North and South had been divided. The Nullification crisis was the first event that highlighted the division between the North and South. The nullification crisis was the confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–33 over the former's attempt to declare null and void within the state the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. The disagreement on the secession of South Carolina caused further disagreements between the North and South (Document A).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War was inevitable; it could have happened earlier or later than it did, but there was no way to avoid this bloody war. Slavery was a controversial topic in the United States and was bound to be the catalyst of a civil war. The Civil War was a result of failures of leadership, the differing societies of the North and the South, and extremism. The citizens from both of these regions of the United States were very close-minded and had their minds made up about where they stood when it came to slavery. Neither side was going to give in to the other 's adamancy and beliefs without putting up a fight and dying for their own beliefs.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” This statement is reassuring the southerners that he will not take slavery away from them and uses ethos to give him credibility by keeping his ideas consistent with his prior ideas. His use of ethos in his speech is a very important rhetorical device because it gives his plans for his presidency credibility, which is necessary if he wants to persuade southerners to believe him. Another example of Lincoln’s persuasive tone is when he says, “I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays