Abortion Ethos Pathos Logos

Both articles do a great Job using rhetorics but the article Is Abortion a Human Right? did a better job. The article used logos a lot by giving plenty of facts and information like when Susan states “The British parliament passed a law in 1967, The Abortion Act, which made the procedure legal up to 28 weeks' gestation. But the law did not extend to Northern Ireland, even though it is part of the United Kingdom. Until the decision this week by a Belfast judge, abortion in Northern Ireland was legal only to save the life and health (including the mental health) of the pregnant woman or girl. Those who perform illegal abortions face up to life in prison, while the patients can be sentenced to 14 years behind bars.” The other article Why am I Pro-Life was not as effective because the speaker mainly just shared his viewpoint with not many ethos or logos to back himself up. …show more content…
That’s why, for me, the most “pro-life” politician in America is New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. While he supports a woman’s right to choose, he has also used his position to promote a whole set of policies that enhance everyone’s quality of life — from his ban on smoking in bars and city parks to reduce cancer, to his ban on the sale in New York City of giant sugary drinks to combat obesity and diabetes, to his requirement for posting calorie counts on menus in chain restaurants, to his push to reinstate the expired federal ban on assault weapons and other forms of common-sense gun control, to his support for early childhood education, to his support for mitigating disruptive climate change.” and this is really him just sharing his opinion on the