Illinois 's federation for right to life operates on the state level. Their website …show more content…
My group never fails to bring up the fact that we were once kids and could have easily been put in the position that most kids whom face the threats of being aborted face. When looking at that it easily coincides with identification. The division part of the identifications come in when the foundation realizes you agree with them on the image or their narrative. If you agree with the image or narratives, then you are like them and when you are like them, you should have the same views as them which is pro life therefore dividing or differencing you from the others, and the other being pro-choice because the are the ones whom fund or stand with planned parenthood.
Furthermore, This image in itself has turned into an image event on social media because most of the hastags pro-life or some form of discussion or arguments about pro-life or Planned Parenthood has the image of this baby with it. The image originated on the foundations website but since the foundation is big and has smaller branches to it, those branches used their grassroots image which in turn made it popular, the image was first seen on their website now, it is on Facebook, twitter, news and also has hastags connoted with …show more content…
When the organization endorses senators or candidates who are pro-life, they are setting the agenda because they are trying to elect into office people who share common interest as them and can put pro-life on the agenda when the get in office. On their website, they have a space that list all who the organization endorses and all those whom endorse them. With endorsing and publicizing whom they choose, Illinois foundation for the right to life is not only name-calling but also bring credibility to the organization because they have reputable senators and individuals supporting the organization and holds the same views as