Comparatively, while Indigenous people are accounted for within the political community, they suffer from being neglected by the state, however, recent developments have manifested progression domestically. In the 1967 referendum, over 90% of Australian voters (consisting of no Aboriginal descent) agreed to change the Australian Constitution to give the federal parliament the power to make laws in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and to allow for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to be included in the census, giving them recognition as human beings, rather than the previous categorisation as “flora and fauna” (Attwood and Markus, 2007: 65). Considered a turning point in the history of relations between Indigenous
…show more content…
This is arguably the foundation of Australia’s continuation of neglect in regards to recognition of Aboriginals and their rights in the political community. As a result from early white Australian’s disregard for the lives of Aboriginal Australians, the modern societal attitude towards Indigenous people are conflicted, however, with increasing societal acceptance of Aboriginals as human beings, parallel with developing political rights and access to legal support (Boldt and Long, 2016: 28). Fundamentally, although with increasing progress, Indigenous recognition within domestic laws has not yet been fully achieved, thus demonstrating infringement of their right to self-determination and the neglect by the …show more content…
There are over 2500 “international binational or multinational agreements and treaties” relating to the environment, where only 272 are fully recognised, multinational UN treaties (Blau, 2017: 76). These treaties cover a diverse set of issues, ranging from toxic chemicals, forests, fish populations, noise pollution, and conservation, where they are framed in a language with which western societies are familiar with, and combined aim provide guidelines for a clean and healthy environment, and to protect all living things, including animals, birds, fish, coral reefs, and trees (Ibid: 77). Internationally, countries with large indigenous populations have included environmental protections in their constitutions, and these are framed or conceived to protect nature as if it were the equal of humanity and to protect humans as if they were part of nature (Johnston, 2010: 18). As visible through Australia’s exploitation of the Murray–Darling basin (Goss, 2008: 3), Aboriginal peoples have a distinctly different relationship with the environment compared to westerners who unreservedly accept the exploitation of natural resources as a normal feature of economic life. As such, Indigenous peoples have played a monumental role in internationally promoting for the conservation of natural resources, as evident in
This is arguably the foundation of Australia’s continuation of neglect in regards to recognition of Aboriginals and their rights in the political community. As a result from early white Australian’s disregard for the lives of Aboriginal Australians, the modern societal attitude towards Indigenous people are conflicted, however, with increasing societal acceptance of Aboriginals as human beings, parallel with developing political rights and access to legal support (Boldt and Long, 2016: 28). Fundamentally, although with increasing progress, Indigenous recognition within domestic laws has not yet been fully achieved, thus demonstrating infringement of their right to self-determination and the neglect by the …show more content…
There are over 2500 “international binational or multinational agreements and treaties” relating to the environment, where only 272 are fully recognised, multinational UN treaties (Blau, 2017: 76). These treaties cover a diverse set of issues, ranging from toxic chemicals, forests, fish populations, noise pollution, and conservation, where they are framed in a language with which western societies are familiar with, and combined aim provide guidelines for a clean and healthy environment, and to protect all living things, including animals, birds, fish, coral reefs, and trees (Ibid: 77). Internationally, countries with large indigenous populations have included environmental protections in their constitutions, and these are framed or conceived to protect nature as if it were the equal of humanity and to protect humans as if they were part of nature (Johnston, 2010: 18). As visible through Australia’s exploitation of the Murray–Darling basin (Goss, 2008: 3), Aboriginal peoples have a distinctly different relationship with the environment compared to westerners who unreservedly accept the exploitation of natural resources as a normal feature of economic life. As such, Indigenous peoples have played a monumental role in internationally promoting for the conservation of natural resources, as evident in