Abolish Death Penalty

Decent Essays
The case of Leo Jones in 1918 resulted in the death of an innocent man in 1998. Jones was convicted of murdering a police officer in Jacksonville, Florida. Jones signed a confession after several hours of police interrogation, but he later claimed the confession was coerced. In the mid- 1980s, the policeman who arrested Jones and the detective who took his confession were forced out of uniform for ethical violations. The policeman was later identified by a fellow offices as “Enforcer” who had used torture. Many witnesses came forward pointing to another suspect in the case. Therefore I do not think the death penalty should be continued or allowed in the US etleast. The death penalty should be abolished because it leads us to the risk of executing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Abolish the Death Penalty In the article “The Death Penalty Deserves the Death Penalty,” by Lincoln Caplan, Caplan is explaining his side on the death penalty. Caplan goes on to discuss different cases specifically Glossip V. Gross which is a case in Oklahoma with death-row inmates that are opposed to the three drug protocol chosen by the state to execute death sentences. Caplan supports his opinion with another case back in 2010, with Jeffrey Landrigan who was scheduled for execution after being convicted of murder in Arizona. The reason Caplan brought up this case is due the fact that the United States had a shortage of the drug needed to execute Landrigan and obtained some non F.D.A approved drugs from a German company in Austria. In Ladrigan’s trial his lawyers wanted confirmation on the effectiveness of the drug and wanted to make sure that their client would not suffer and the state refused to provide…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards. "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that there is a better way to sentence someone rather then sentence them to death. I think there should be no death penalty because one, it costs way too much. Second, we are taking a life, someone’s child. Finally, the poor are more likely to get the death penalty. There are many more reasons why we should get rid of it…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas leads the nation in a high number of executions and has the third largest death row after California and Florida. Although people commit harsh crimes such as murder I strongly disapprove of the death penalty. The death sentence does not deter crime, does not bring glee to the family members of the lost souls, it does not stop potential criminals nor does it prevent public safety. I was always taught growing up that two wrongs does not make it right. Texas should abolish the death penalty do to judges’ falsely sentencing and executing innocent people because in my opinion Texas is a racist state.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first death penalty law was adopted around the Eighteenth Century B.C.E. The law was put in place by King Hammurabi of Babylon. Capital punishment came to America during the European colonization in the Seventeenth Century. Since then, the United States was formed. Originally, every state used capital punishment up until 1846 when Michigan banned capital punishment for all crimes except treason.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hammurabi Debate

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A special prosecutor hired to re-examine the case found him to be innocent. The death penalty puts innocents lives at risk and should be…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dealing with the loss of a family member or loved one is already one difficult thing. However, it is as if a domino effect is taking place when the “universe” is disrupted by the troubles. From one person to another, how can we deal with the victims’ families when they’re in pain dealing with their loss? For example, taking the case of the parents of the victim, Faith Hathaway, I believe that they are better served by not given the possibility of the death penalty of the murderer. Simply because I find the “death penalty method” inhumane and ridiculous.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the rest of the states that it remains legal in. “The death penalty is the ultimate irreversible denial of human rights. ”(Insert Citation) The U.S.A is one of the only nine countries in the world to have carried out an execution every year, in the years 2009 and 2013. The other countries that still carry out the death penalty are Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Yemen.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why do we chose to kill criminals when we are trying to show other people that killing is wrong? Many americans think we are civilized but they are not. We have executed more criminals than any other country have. I don't believe we should give death penalties to criminals because it’s going against the Eighth Amendment, violating human rights and government is going into a economic decline. Even though the Eighth Amendment states that cruel and unusual punishment should not be allowed in the United Stated, we still have death penalties.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Human Rights Watch, the prohibition on the death penalty for crimes committed by juvenile offenders - persons under age eighteen at the time of the offence - is well established in international treaty and customary law. The overwhelming majority of states comply with this standard: only five states are known to have executed juvenile offenders since 2005. In recent years the United States (US), Pakistan, and China have taken steps toward abolishing the juvenile death penalty, with varying levels of success. The U.S took a bold step in 2005 when the U.S Supreme Court abolished juvenile death penalty (Laurence, et al, 583). The juvenile justice system is based on the belief that juveniles are developmentally different from adults.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishments role in America plays a huge part in how America handles offenders and repeat offenders. Staticbrain.com reports that Time magazine says,” An estimated 2,000,000 people have been victims of crimes, from assault to murder. With insufficient laws to address these issues, criminals become careless and bolder. For this reason, there is a need for a death penalty.” Capital punishment, should not be abolished because, it takes committing a heinous act to receive the death penalty.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays