“An Argument to Be Made about Immigrant Babies and Citizenship” is written by George F. Will and in this essay the author challenges the citizenship status of children born to illegal immigrants. Will argues that the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to any person born in the United States, is being misinterpreted. He explains how this misinterpretation leads to the actual act of illegal immigration. For example, by essentially rewarding the children of illegal immigrants with an American citizenship Will demonstrates how this provides an incentive for illegal immigration. The author makes clear the idea that when the 14th Amendment was written in 1866 it could not have included illegal immigrants since that concept did not exist at…
With the introduction of the Dream Act, came many opposing views. Although the DREM Act has specific conditions that each undocumented immigrant would have to meet through the application process, “after five years, DREAM Act-eligible immigrants would be granted citizenship and those with blue-card status would be eligible to become legal permanent residents” (The Senate's 3). Conservative strongest criticism of this legislation is the Dream Act would grant amnesty to illegal immigrants. (The Senate's 3). Since there is no way to verify when an illegal immigrant child came to America, The Dream Act would be difficult to track and encourage further influx of illegal immigrants to enter America who seek a better life for their family.…
(Campbell. 2017) Since these people are contributing to our country in such a large way, they should also be a part of our society. In the U.S people are able to gain citizenship through three different ways, birth, blood and naturalization. If they are born her, they were born under at least one U.S citizen, and acquiring it legally. The Naturalization process is not simple, and is very complicated…
According to the 14th Amendment, anyone born on the United States soil, even children whose parents are not themselves U.S. citizen, is a U.S. citizen. The author agrees that Ted Cruze is not a born U.S. citizen because he born in Canada instead of on U.S. soil. However, the author argues that neither the 14th Amendment nor the Article II of Constitution state that birth on U.S. soil is the only way to become a citizen at birth. The author also points out that base on the way Ted Cruz was born, he was a citizen at birth. As outlined by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, one will be given the birth-based American citizenship if at least one parent was an America citizen and lived in the United States for more than five years after…
How can you condemn a child to poverty because you are unwilling to allow them to continue their education because they are illegal, and furthermore the actions, which made them illegal, were not even their action but rather their parents? How can you rightfully sit back while back while this atrocity happens so often? All this could be solved with the DREAM Act that would be implemented to allow for illegal immigrants (who fit the required criteria) to be allowed to pursue their secondary education, go into the military, and begin their track to earning citizenship. The DREAM Act will keep our nation on top of the competition in this time of globalization and flattening of the world by finding new curious and passionate minds who are willing…
After a extensive history of excluding outsiders from the citizenship process and using citizenship as a justification for granting some rights while denying others’ rights, the fourteenth amendment finally granted birthright citizenship by stating “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This amendment radically reduced the ability for people to justify unequal legal treatment of freed slaves because it forced freed slaves be acknowledged as legal and valid citizens of the United States. However the amendment did not erase the anti-immigrant sentiment by any regard. Anti-slavery sentiment only strengthened after the passage of the fourteenth amendment, and even President Andrew Johnson openly opposed the amendment, believing it “stepped on states' rights to determine how African Americans should be treated.” The Fourteenth Amendment was a fundamental step into the shift away from the paradigm of excluding and oppressing ethnic minorities that was created through the Three-Fifths compromise and the Dred Scott Case.…
Constitution. While republican presidential candidates, specifically Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, are pushing for it’s removal, “other candidates and legal experts are split on the issue”() because it is clearly protected by The Constitution. Trump claims he has a number of lawyer on his side the deem it possible and constitutional to take the right but has yet to prove any evidence. Most experts say that it is, in fact, not constitutional since the clear reading of the 14th Amendment decree that all those born under U.S. jurisdiction are American citizens so the only way only way to get rid of birthright citizenship is by either repealing or arranging the amendment. Both options are extremely difficult and drawn-out processes because they involve all branches of the government and many different phases.…
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, known as IRCA, is related to racialized sentiments. According to Golash-Boza, the discussions of implementing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 raised racialized sentiments about Mexicans. Mexicans were thought to be a threat as they were seen as “taking jobs from Americans, overusing welfare, and refusing to assimilate” although that was opposite of what was actually happening (Golash-Boza 374). The time when Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was being discussed was the time when the economy was bad and so blame went to Latin Americans, whom at the time were moving to the United States in a great number while “[generating] waves of nativism and anti-immigrant sentiment”…
The 14th Amendment in the United States constitution allows jurisdiction to citizens born in the United States of America. We have to keep in mind the constitution guarantees and protect our civil liberties, our freedom. Removing natural born citizens to immigrants is not right or constitutional, also will not help America's illegal immigration. The numbers that surprise me the most in the Pew Polling was African-American's numbers show support in favor leaving the 14th amendment as is. This makes an outstanding point in citizenship.…
All people that are born in the United States shouldn’t be guaranteed citizenship and not be given the rights that they deserve. It does not make sense that if a person who is born in the U.S. but to parents who are citizens to foreign countries should be a citizen. People from all around the world come to our country just to have kids that are automatically declared American citizens. That is why we are having trouble securing our borders and preventing immigrants from all over the world coming to our country. I am in favor of dual citizenship and support it fully but what the 14th Amendment says should be modified.…
In my point of view, I would say that the fourteenth amendment should not be changed. People should not be arguing that it should only grant citizenship to those children who have at least one legal immigrant parent. This amendment is one of the oldest and most important right given by the U.S. Society and the law can’t blame the children, just because their parents wanted a better life for them. Every child has the same rights regardless of the status of their parent. People can’t blame the children for being born in the United States, because they didn’t have the option to choose whether they wanted or not.…
Immigration is happening at a very high rate, some legally and many not legally. Approximately 11 million people live undocumented in the U.S.(Immigration notes). All immigrants have arrived from what is known as the front door, side door, and back door policy. Front door policy is when a person arrives to be a permanent citizen by going through the legal steps to be a citizen (Immigration notes). First they become a naturalized citizen and are here in a legal long term residency which after so many years, are considered to be citizens.…
Jack Kemp a person in the article, “American Should Great Birthright Citizenship to Children of Illegal Immigrants,” argues that “restrictions on citizenship are not the right way for the United Stated to respond to the problem of illegal immigration. Ending birthright citizenship would violate the United States Constitution and would do little to deter illegal immigration” (par. 1). The children that are born in the United States have the right to stay. The fourteen amendment gives them protection from losing their United State citizenships; however, since their parents are illegal immigrants the congress want to take away their citizenship. Is it good taking them away from their family who was not born here?…
Immigration reform has always been a big topic in the US. It has been an important topic/ situation in our family as well as the Hispanic community. This affects not just the Hispanic community but also any immigrant that has decided to call the US its home. While I believe it’s important to know/ screen the people that are allowed into this country I believe that the government does prey on some of the innocent immigrants. The government makes false promises constantly and each president regardless of the term.…
Many of them honestly don’t plan on having any children here. Some don’t even plan on staying here for as long as they do either. Taking this right away from their children will only harm the children in the future. They are in no way at fault for being born in a country where their parents are foreigners. They deserve to be treated just like any other race born here.…