She expresses a sense of regret about forcing him on the voyage. In fact, this emotional strategy transitions very well to her next approach by making it easier for the explanation on why she does it. This then allows her to be able to speak with pride of how proud she is of his erudition and even how far he can go beyond this stage. In addition to it, Abigail Adams mentions an author's comparison to prove the point that she's not the only one pushing towards the advice on taking an advantage on the advantages. This comparison however is not a coincidence especially, when she knows it's relevant and that he'll be able to relate. Also when speaking about the author's comparision, she uses the word judicious to describe the traveller in order to show John Adam how beneficial it is and the good labels that come along with it. After, she reflects back on particular group that went through the same situation. In which she plays the tyrannies and John Adams as Cicero. This evidence is use so that not all of it will be opinions but facts as well. And in the rhetorical question, " would Cicero have / if he not been, roused, kindled, and inflamed", an elevation in pride occurs because now she has a motivation to keep advising especially when her claim has already been proven
She expresses a sense of regret about forcing him on the voyage. In fact, this emotional strategy transitions very well to her next approach by making it easier for the explanation on why she does it. This then allows her to be able to speak with pride of how proud she is of his erudition and even how far he can go beyond this stage. In addition to it, Abigail Adams mentions an author's comparison to prove the point that she's not the only one pushing towards the advice on taking an advantage on the advantages. This comparison however is not a coincidence especially, when she knows it's relevant and that he'll be able to relate. Also when speaking about the author's comparision, she uses the word judicious to describe the traveller in order to show John Adam how beneficial it is and the good labels that come along with it. After, she reflects back on particular group that went through the same situation. In which she plays the tyrannies and John Adams as Cicero. This evidence is use so that not all of it will be opinions but facts as well. And in the rhetorical question, " would Cicero have / if he not been, roused, kindled, and inflamed", an elevation in pride occurs because now she has a motivation to keep advising especially when her claim has already been proven