The EEOC charged Abercrombie on Elauf's sake as well as ensured that the association had slighted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by declining to select Elauf in light of her head scarf. Abercrombie struggled that Elauf had a commitment to prompt the examiner which she required a settlement from the Look Policy as well as that the headscarf was not the presentation of a really held religious conviction. District court conceded rundown judgment for the EEOC. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth course pivoted and held up that outline judgment should have been yielded for Abercrombie in light of the fact that there is no true blue issue of reality that Elauf did not advise her examiner which she had a conflict with the Look Policy
