There was and I think there still is, this ever growing dispute between nature and reality. An argument between faith, truth, and reason. Gaining knowledge and understanding faith is different than gaining the knowledge of a mathematical formula to solve an equation. Being able to piece together logical thoughts to solve a problem, such as one plus one equals two, is different than say the existence of water in nature. Water existing in nature comes from the universal ideal of God and that God alone created the universe. These ideals and similar ideals stem from …show more content…
He later taught at both Naples and Paris (Spielvogel p. 299). Thomas Aquinas’ most famous piece of work is Summa Theoligica. It is in this piece he believed there are there are two conflicting truths in life. The possibility of truth which comes from reason and a truth which comes from faith. In one area of Summa Theologica, Aquinas argues “for a connection between the virtuous man and God by explaining how the virtuous act is one towards the blessedness. God governs the world as the universal first cause.”
Peter Abelard was considered a nominalist who created a work titled Sic et Non. Abelard believed in the “use of logic or dialectical reasoning to reconcile apparent differences systematically” (Spielvogel p. 298). His theories were much different than that of Thomas Aquinas. Abelard based his teachings on the use of philosophy while Aquinas based his teachings on theology. Peter Abelard determined that our ability to question the world around us, could lead us to seek for the answers and by seeking the answers we then discover the