AP Government Unit 2: Case Study

Decent Essays
Necolle Cruz
AP Government Unit 2
Dr. Phillip Smith
8/27/16

Citation: 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct. 2140, 29 L. Ed. 2d 822, 1971 U.S. New York Times Co. v. U.S.

Facts: New York Times wanted to publish a paper with classified history of the Pentagon, which included information of events that happened in Vietnam, the document was also known as “The Pentagon Papers”. According to oyez.org, the President argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security.

Issue: Is the first amendment being violated by the paper not being published because it is classified information?

Previous History: Washington Post Company v. U.S.

Reasoning: It was decided that the word security shouldn’t do away with the rights of the first amendment.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Name Camelia Barrows Case Wickard v. Filburn Case Citation: Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S. Ct. 82, 87 L. Ed. 122 (1942) Facts: In 1938 the Agricultural Adjustment Act, or AAA, was passed to limit the amount of wheat grown and sold, as to prevent surpluses or shortages, and set fines for the overproduction of wheat. Filburn sold a portion of the wheat he grew and kept the rest for himself. But according to the AAA , the amount Filburn sold plus what Filburn kept exceeded the limit of how much wheat was allowed to be grown.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dustin Hoffman v. Los Angeles Magazine An article entitled "Grand Illusions" in the "Fabulous Hollywood Issue!" of Los Angeles Magazine in March 1997 featured several famous film stills altered such that the movie stars appeared to be wearing spring fashions. The scenes included Cary Grant in “North by Northwest,” John Travolta in “Saturday Night Fever,” Elvis Presley in “Jailhouse Rock,” ), and Marilyn Monroe in "The Seven Year Itch.” The final image was a play on the legendary image of Dustin Hoffman posing in front of an American flag from the 1982 film “Tootsie,” but Hoffman was depicted in a Richard Tyler butter-colored silk gown and Ralph Lauren heels instead of the original red long-sleeved sequined evening dress and high heels. One month later, Hoffman filed a $5 million lawsuit against Los Angeles Magazine's owner and publisher, Fairchild Publications (which is owned by Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.), alleging that the photograph misappropriated Hoffman's name and likeness in violation of the California common law right of publicity, the California statutory right of publicity, the California unfair competition statute, and the federal Lanham Act.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Company X (target) has recently completed a merger with Company Y (acquirer). As part of the merger agreement a shareholder/employee with a 6% ownership in Company X, named Dr. Frederick, from Company X has agreed to give up his shares, work for Company Y, and give up all claims and interests in his intellectual property. In return for his agreement, Dr. Frederick was payed a sum of $1 million. According to the merger agreement, which Dr. Frederick consented to, the $1 million would be allocated as $350,000 capital gain and $650,000 ordinary income treated as deferred compensation. Dr. Frederick and his tax advisors maintain that the entire $1 million should be treated as a capital gain because “He only gave up one asset of any value, his 6%…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New York, which stated that “freedoms of speech and the press were fundamental rights that were protected under the due process clause.” (Curtis 71) This interpretation was used to “protect other rights against state infringement.” (Atherton…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Muckraker Research Paper

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In one of the first court cases to challenge the freedom of speech, Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) set precedent for not only citizens speech but eventually journalism during a time of war. The defendants of this case, one being Jacob Abrams, were found guilty of violating the Espionage Act of 1917, for distributing flyers in support of Russian government. The act made it a criminal offense to obtain information of national defense and communicating them to the enemy. Justice John Hessin Clarke gave the majority opinion of the…

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kent State Shooting Essay

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kent State Incident Were the shootings at Kent State justifiable? The shootings that happened at Kent State weren't expected to happen, but they did. The protest got way out of hand when the protesters set the ROTC building on fire. “ Nixon and his top foreign affairs advisor, Henry Kissinger, tired several tactics to extricate the U.S. from the war without just turning over South Vietnamese government into taking more responsibility for the war. To force the issue, the U.S began withdrawing some troops in 1969.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Near v. Minnesota case, the supreme Court ruled that the First amendment protected against prior restraint. This case deals with a man named J.M. Near. Near was a resident of the state of Minnesota, he was the publisher of a newspaper called "the Saturday Press. " The content of the newspaper was thought to be racist, prejudiced, and hateful. Due to the spread of the hateful speech being released into the public, Near was then taken into custody by the state.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New York Times went to the District Court and they decided to accept the order that would force them to stop printing articles that had information about the Pentagon Paper, but the District Court rejected the government administration's request to to obtain such an order. But the case went to the Court Of Appeals and they granted the government administration the order until June 25th. The Washington Post went to court at the Court for the District of Columbia and the government's request was rejected , then they went to Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and the government's request was rejected again. There was an inconsistency between the courts so the Supreme Court decided to hear the case. The case went to the Supreme Court and after hearing arguments from all the sides involved on June 25 and 26th, they ruled in a 6-3 decision to uphold the rights of both newspaper companies and allowed them to continue publishing the…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Materials Compromised Fortunately, Regan did not successfully disseminate classified materials to foreign countries; he managed to lose and forget where he placed majority of the materials he stole. After Regan’s arrest, he agreed to fully cooperate with the government and disclose all of his locations where he placed classified materials. The FBI managed to recover approximately 20,000 pages of classified documents and multiple CDs and videotapes. Majority of the information on the materials consisted of tactical information collected on a classified network, images of missile sites of Iran, Iraq and China.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schenck then responded that the Espionage Act violated the First Amendment. The Supreme Court determined that the Espionage Act did not violate the First Amendment. “The Court then argued that "the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done." While in peacetime such flyers could be construed as harmless speech, in times of war they could be construed as acts of national insubordination.” (McBride, Schenck v. U.S.)…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Research Paper

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Natural rights, privacy, and security are all superior within the Patriot Act. America, now-a-days, are terrorized by foreigners and out-of-state citizens for the control and power over the United States. By reading the primary source documents and commentary texts, it helped to show how the Patriot Act has a relationship to the Bill of Rights because of the reasoning to find a proper balance between national security and individual rights, explaining how the Patriot Act and privacy goes hand in hand with each other, and trying to find a solution to the debate over the Patriot Act. The Reason to finding a proper balance between national security and individual rights is so that the government doesn’t infringe on American rights. On September…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Today’s example of how it protects citizens of the United States (Current Event) CHECK OFF LIST PAPER 1 PAPER 2 2 to 2 ½ Pages Typed and Double Spaced Times Roman Font12 Point/1” Margins Historical Information…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the mid-1960s, the United States government felt it was necessary to increase military assistance in South Vietnam in order to protect the region from Communist North Vietnam. US officials feared that Communism would soon spread across the world without military intervention. In the eyes of the American public, the war efforts appear successful until 1968 when the Vietcong issued an attack on South Vietnam known as the Tet Offensive. Although the attack itself wasn’t very successful, it reveal to the American public that US war efforts in Vietnam weren’t going as well as the government was conveying.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Field Case Analysis

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The newspaper said that they were protected by the First Amendment; but the Supreme Court ruled that lies are not protected under the First Amendment. I think this ruling sets precedent for what is covered under the First Amendment when it comes to false claims. It really helped with ruling in the Abel Fields case because Abel Fields claimed that he was protected under the First Amendment; but in the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan it shows that lies are not protected under the First…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays