Ethical Dilemma Part B
Gladwell Kamaru
Midamerica Nazarene University
Ethical Dilemma Part B
Introduction
In the previous paper I wrote how I would resolve the ethical dilemma surrounding the case study on Wilma. Upon communications with a licensed professional mental health counselor, reviewing the AMHCA code of ethics as well as the ACA code of ethics, and including moral principles a counselor ought to follow through I made a final decision. The final decision would most likely be determine by many factors. For instant how competence I am in handling Wilma’s case, suppose I wasn’t knowledgeable, leaving me to impose more harm than good. According to moral principle non-maleficence and the AMHCA code of ethics. If Wilma ultimate choice was to have an abortion I would refer this case to another counselor is more competence and well adjusted to handle the case. Also I would terminate the relationship after the first session explaining my decision to the client. I would also refer the case to another counselor assuming my personal values and perceptions put me in a place where I cannot fulfill my job.
However, provided I was competence enough or say ready to challenge but counsel Wilma into a choosing adoption or …show more content…
The reason that thing is challenging is because of something I have experienced in my life. I had a friend who was raped, the church supported her during the recovery time. However, she become pregnant, she got an abortion because of numerous issues. When individuals heard of her story, she received backlash from the community, the church and was ultimately shun. She was alleviated from becoming a mother, but she was left with greater pain. She attempted to commit suicide more than two times, when she started therapy nobody was there no church or community willing to support her towards
Gladwell Kamaru
Midamerica Nazarene University
Ethical Dilemma Part B
Introduction
In the previous paper I wrote how I would resolve the ethical dilemma surrounding the case study on Wilma. Upon communications with a licensed professional mental health counselor, reviewing the AMHCA code of ethics as well as the ACA code of ethics, and including moral principles a counselor ought to follow through I made a final decision. The final decision would most likely be determine by many factors. For instant how competence I am in handling Wilma’s case, suppose I wasn’t knowledgeable, leaving me to impose more harm than good. According to moral principle non-maleficence and the AMHCA code of ethics. If Wilma ultimate choice was to have an abortion I would refer this case to another counselor is more competence and well adjusted to handle the case. Also I would terminate the relationship after the first session explaining my decision to the client. I would also refer the case to another counselor assuming my personal values and perceptions put me in a place where I cannot fulfill my job.
However, provided I was competence enough or say ready to challenge but counsel Wilma into a choosing adoption or …show more content…
The reason that thing is challenging is because of something I have experienced in my life. I had a friend who was raped, the church supported her during the recovery time. However, she become pregnant, she got an abortion because of numerous issues. When individuals heard of her story, she received backlash from the community, the church and was ultimately shun. She was alleviated from becoming a mother, but she was left with greater pain. She attempted to commit suicide more than two times, when she started therapy nobody was there no church or community willing to support her towards