In which, The argument against this mandate is that the government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed most of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, comprising the controversial individual mandate that requires most Americans to obtain health insurance. In, the federal government has the authority to summon Americans who do not purchase health insurance; because, it is considered a tax. Another ethical challenge is the demand for electronic medical $20 records. However, this could generate a significant moral challenge for privacy and confidentiality. Unfortunately, the billion for health information technology from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) did not make any effort to change the current HIPPA privacy paradigm, according to Lachman. (Lachman,
In which, The argument against this mandate is that the government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed most of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, comprising the controversial individual mandate that requires most Americans to obtain health insurance. In, the federal government has the authority to summon Americans who do not purchase health insurance; because, it is considered a tax. Another ethical challenge is the demand for electronic medical $20 records. However, this could generate a significant moral challenge for privacy and confidentiality. Unfortunately, the billion for health information technology from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) did not make any effort to change the current HIPPA privacy paradigm, according to Lachman. (Lachman,