Gun-Control In America

Brilliant Essays
Victor Ikhuehi
Dr. Megan McGregor
History 1301, 2pm
11/13/2016
Gun control in America
Introduction
Saul Cornell’s book, “A Well-Regulated Militia,” examines several notions regarding the right of Americans to bear arms as prevalent in several historical moments. The author’s study looks into the static conception that was dominant in several public discussions for the constitutional provision applicable to gun control. He traces some of the element that pose as competitive influences on the rights of individuals states and the role that arms played in the united states’ society. However, he overlooks the republican pairing of the duties as well as the rights of gun owner-ship in the late 18th century America. It would be essential to view
…show more content…
The enthusiasm was expressed through the militia, a provision that would supersede legislative acts as well as the written constitution (Cornell 896-897). The Whiskey Rebels viewed their situation under the Federal Constitution as an improvement of their situation before the Revolution. The plebian constitutionalism did not only challenge the vision held by elite Federalists, but the Democratic-Republicans’ state-centered constitutionalism. For this reason, the militia under the Whiskey Rebellion acted as an agent of the spirit of the community, a view that opposed the idea that the state was the suitable agent that could mobilize the militia.
The position of both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists on gun control and standing armies
Federalists echoed the sentiments from the Founding Fathers in relation to the aspect of gun control, to which they emphasized on the needs for the right to bear and keep arms as a factor that should be included in the constitution. The sentiments follow the thoughts of statesman Noah Webster, who advocated for the idea that America’s supreme power could not enforce unjust laws forcefully (Cornell 46). They could not do so because when people were armed, their force could be superior to that wielded by the regular troops. The government did not have to fear trusting its
…show more content…
The Founding Fathers advocated for the inclusion of the access to firearms, devoid of governmental interference, in the constitution. In spite of the desire exhibited by the Founding Fathers, some arguments cropped up against the inclusion of the provision into the constitution. The rejection of the Founding Fathers’ sentiments did not only lead to the rise in debates about gun control, but they led to disagreements between Federalists and Anti-Federalists on the role of the national government in commanding and funding the state militias. However, the freedom to bear arms should be looked at from the perspective of people’s civic obligations. References
Carter, Gregg L. Gun Control in the United States: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO, 2006. Print.
Cornell, Saul. "Mobs, Militias, And Magistrates: Popular Constitutionalism And The Whiskey Rebellion". Chicago-Kent Law Review 81.3 (2006): 883-903. Print.
Cornell, Saul. A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article “Guns a Loaded Argument” by Paul Rosenzweig argues his interpretation of the popular controversy over gun laws in the United States. The author Paul Rosenzweig is an adjunct professor of law at George Mason University. He is also the senior legal research colleague in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, the website in which the article is available. The Heritage Foundation is a research and informative institution that publicizes conservative policy topics that support the principle ideas that the foundation stands for. The author has written this article for a mainly conservative audience of readers to allow people more insight into the intricate issues of gun control.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13 Amendment History

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The second amendment’s original message of protecting each American’s right is to keep and bear arms- to be armed at a level equal to the government. With originality comes history. The historical side of the second amendment, along with the other historical backgrounds of the original 13 amendments, is part of the solid foundation of the United States of America. The second amendment’s purpose in the Constitution, credited to the Founders, is merely to allow us to intimidate burglars, or hunt wild game to our hearts’ content. This is not to say that hunting game for the family dinner, or defending against personal dangers, were not anticipated uses for firearms, particularly on the frontier.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment gives the citizens of the United States the right to bear arm. Considering the enormity of this right, a heated debate has ensued on whether this right should be restricted. However, in the interest of public safety this right afforded by the bill of rights should be tightly regulated. This viewpoint has been developed through trial and error, after several mass shootings and high murder rates with a fire arms the United States is rendered no option but to restrict the Second Amendment to preserve the safety of the public.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control Everyone has their opinion over Guns, many believe it’s ok to have guns but others disagree. But many have guns for protection, I understand people abuse the power on having guns and commit a crime. Many shootings have occurred this year and last year.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By stripping its citizens of their rights, the American republic modeled the very government that they once rebelled against. The government’s response in the Whiskey Rebellion was a departure from the spirit of the American Revolution. Desperate to solidify the…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States is a nation where individual rights are guaranteed and practiced to some extent. For example, the amendments created by the United States government have raised questions and doubts in many individual’s minds where an answer is nowhere to be found. As stated in 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This has become a controversial issue all around the United States of America. Although some people may believe that guns should be banned, in reality the right to be armed should not be ceased because it provides protection and it reveals to the American Citizens that their rights are guaranteed.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of the Second Amendment, one controversial issue has been whether the Founding Fathers considered the future use of guns. On the one hand, the federal government argues for stricter regulations towards people who bear arms. On the contrary, the people of the state contend that our rights shall not be infringed. With respect to both parties, stricter gun laws are needed to protect American’s from massacres. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most disputed debates in the modern world is over the Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well Regulated

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Daniel Schultz article “The “Well Regulated” Militia of the Second Amendment: An Examination of the Framers’ Intentions” provides readers with information questioning the meaning of “well regulated” and “militia.” The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution gives the right for all citizens to bear arms under a well regulated militia, but the true meaning of “well regulated” and “militia” are the cause of the controversial issue among leaders of the United States. Daniel discusses multiple issues that arise from this: the constitution does not state who has the authority to regulate this militia and does not state which militia is being regulated. Throughout the United States Constitution, the term regulated is used multiple times,…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is very clear and stated soundly, that the right to bear arms by the people shall not be infringed upon. Therefore, this paper establishes that gun ownership is indeed an inherent right. The application of gun control measures by the courts, therefore, should be based not only on the first clause of the text of the Second Amendment, but on both clauses, which are separately interpreted. Therefore the decision by certain courts to determine that civilians vacate the right to own guns independent of the state is unfounded and…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Modern day America has far surpassed any futuristic dreams our nation’s founding fathers could conjure. Does that mean we should change the premises of the laws put in place so long ago to secure this nation’s future? In 1791 James Madison, in response to expressed concerns from several states added to the growing amendment’s in the Bill of Rights to protect the United States from the potential abuse of governmental power (Bill Of Rights Instuitute , 2015). The second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed (Bill Of Rights Instuitute , 2015).”…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays