Advantages And Disadvantages Of Cabinet

Improved Essays
It is true that the major decision making body in New Zealand’s (NZ’s) government, Cabinet, does operate only under the presence of constitutional conventions. However, this is unique and is the oddest aspect of NZ’s constitution. Thus, it is important to look at the advantages and disadvantages of such a body and how this works in the current political environment of Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) in NZ. Cabinet is a collective group of elected crown ministers headed by the Prime Minister (PM), who meet weekly to decide government policy. Cabinet heads the executive branch of government which executes laws and policies. Individual ministers instruct politically neutral public servants, the armed forces and police, and conduct foreign relations …show more content…
Despite the executive not being prescribed in law, Cabinet is the most powerful body in the NZ government and is central to the NZ legal system. The existence of Cabinet depends on constitutional conventions, but its functions are governed by the Cabinet Manual. NZ is unique in regards to its constitutional make-up; unlike other countries, the constitution is not contained in one document but is made up of a variety of laws, legal judgements and conventions. Constitutional conventions are non-legal rules which are recognized as effective rules to govern which have emerged from practice and capture the way things ought to be done. They are followed not because it is prescribed in law that they should be, but because they have proven to be successful over time. Conventions add a level of flexibility to NZ’s constitutional structure allowing it to adapt to changing circumstances. Constitutional conventions are not found in any formal document, and because they are not written down, they are in danger of being ignored or interpreted loosely. They are unenforceable in courts and are …show more content…
Furthermore, the Governor-General can dismiss a minister at any time, on the advice of the PM, thus, ministers are obliged to act within a certain framework. Thus, ministers who do not exercise their respective powers in a manner compatible with Cabinet’s decision, risk losing their powers. Ministerial appointments and dismissals are at the hands of the PM, which means that Cabinet cannot directly initiate any action against the PM. However, a PM who tries to act against opposition from his Cabinet risks losing the confidence of his party colleagues. There is therefore a balance which limits the power of the PM to an extent. Conventions help to regulate Cabinet but due to the lack of formal legislation establishing Cabinet, the power it is able to utilize is largely undefined. For the most part, Cabinet has yet to act upon such power in a dictatorial-executive manner. It can, in effect, determine what bills make it into parliament, control delegated legislation and policy. However, despite such a potential risk, the social contract in NZ between and citizens and parliament means that this is highly unlikely to occur; it is the conventions regarding their authority that bind and hold considerable force over Cabinet

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Halifax Blues

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior to the actual lesson which deals with the poem {\tql}Halifax blues{\tqr} by George Elliot Clarke and the eponymous city, the class is to be introduced firstly to Canada as a country. The teaching unit thereby chooses a top-down approach to the topic by looking at the overall aspects as for instance {\tql}Government{\tqr}, {\tql}Provinces and Territories{\tqr} and {\tql}People{\tqr} and then closing in on the capital city of the Province Nova Scotia, Halifax, and the poem that draws a gloomy picture of a night around the harbor of this city. During this lesson of getting introduced to Canada, the students are supposed to learn the following about Canada: Canada is the second largest country in the world and occupies, apart from Greenland, Alaska and the French islands of St-Pierre and Miquelon, the northern region of the North American Continent. Canada is divided into ten provinces and three territories, whereby the capital is Ottawa.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Australian Constitution is outdated and is in need of urgent reform’ Introduction The Australian constitution are a set of rules in which Australia is governed. It was drafted as a series of conventions which was held in the 1890s. The constitution was passed by the British Parliament as part of the Commonwealth of australia constitution Act 1900 which took effect on january 1 on 1901. The constitution are voted by the people in a series of referendums and created the composition of the australian parliament, it shows how the parliament works, what power it has, power sharing between the federal and state parliaments and also the role high court and executive.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President's Cabinet

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the recent presidential election, we’ve all been worried about what one person is going to do for this country and how they’re going to make us better, but we never actually think about who is going to be helping him with these decisions. Actually the Constitution doesn’t even mention these roles specifically, but most presidents will choose to have some help by a few of their most-trusted advisers (Sidlow). Most people never actually give this any thought, but the president has a team behind him who helps with his decisions on certain topics his “cabinet.” The president carefully chooses members of his cabinet in order to assist with whatever department they have been appointed to. Each elected president must research and figure out…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this system the prime minster is picked by the political party that has the majority power in parliament. Hudson believes this is a better system due to the fact that because both the prime minster and parliament are a part of the same political party they would try to pass the same agenda. This would make them more responsive because legislation can get passed in a timely manner and more accountable because votes would know exactly who to blame when things go wrong. I believe there is nothing wrong with the separation of powers system. It is working just like the framers wanted it to work.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cabinet: A cabinet is defined as the heads of the fifteen executive branch departments of the federal government. In simpler terms the cabinet serves as the advisors to the president. The cabinet is made up of the leaders of the executive departments of government. Only very few members of the cabinet are directly picked by the president. An example of a cabinet in government is the attorney general, which is an actual title of a cabinet member.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 6 Term Paper

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Structural ex ante constrains on the agencies that prevent deviations before they occur “The most effective means for achieving policy stability are constraints on the flexibility of agencies, rather than reliance on rewards, punishments, and oversight.” Enfranchising the constituents of presidents and congress through administrative structure and process, we can constrain the bureaucrats. We should clarify each political player’s responsibility and right by regulations and laws with negotiation and bargain.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas Constitution

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “Texas constitution is one the of longest and oldest still in effect. The Alabama Constitution, although ratified 25 years after Texas' had been deemed the longest and most chaotic having been amended almost 800 times” (Ballotpedia, 2016). The Texas Constitution allows for some interesting differences in comparison to the United States Constitution. The one that will be focused on is the difference in the Executive Branch.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australia’s parliamentary system is categorised as a fusion as opposed to a separation of powers as the executive branch is answerable and part of the legislative branch. Each branch of government should work within their areas of responsibility so they act like checks and balances on each other with 100 years of stable government testifying to its effectiveness. A fourth way which holds the governmental branches accountable is the citizens of the country, they form a check and balance system. Citizens are able to judge a government come election time but Parliament holds governments responsible for their actions in-between elections (Fenna, 2014). Australia uses a liberal system of government which implies that there is a need to have limits of the power of governments as indicated by (Fenna, 2014).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Executive Branch contains the President and his Cabinet. The President acts as Head of State, which is the Chief Representative of the United States. The Cabinet is appointed by the President and carries out the duties of the Executive office under the authority of the President. There are multiple government agency’s that the president appoints the heads of, including the CIA, EPA and many more, the President also appoints the head of over 50 independent government agencies.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leaders or ministers of an agency who generally do not have advanced technical training in the area of their administrative portfolio possess considerable power over the agencies actions, and in some cases its objectives. A severe deviation could be based purely on value or instrumental rationality, even on behalf of their associated political party. A poor decision might be in contrast with popular public opinion, and, in turn, destabilise the legitimacy of the executive authority. A contemporary example of legal-rational authority is evident in all liberal democratic states, whose leaders claim their legitimacy based on formalised legal processes. Its wide dissemination is a testament to its ability to provide lasting political…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Legislative branch comes the Executive branch and is made up of the President and Vice President as well as their advisors and government agencies. In the second article of the Constitution, the Executive branch is assigned its own powers and roles in helping run the country’s government and people. Although the main function of the Executive branch is to execute the law, the Executive branch is divided into five different roles or “chiefs.” As Chief Executive, the president is in charge of making sure that all abide by the laws passed by Congress, send forth executive orders to the public, nominate judges and even those in the Supreme Court with the Senate’s consent, choose government officials depending on Senate approval, and acting…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many constitutional conventions are a result of traditional practices. In the UK, many constitutional conventions came from the formulation of political practices in the 18th century and towards the end of the 19th century. The ambiguity of these conventions has led to discussions about whether there is a need for a codification of the constitution of the UK, which would try to dismiss this uncertainty and instead state outright the…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first major advantage of Parliamentary government is that there is no election to select the PM directly. Parliamentary elections function using a straightforward principle that the majority rules (Mintz et al. 332). People vote for the person that will represent their riding (consisting of 100,000 people) (Bourne, Class Notes). The political party whose candidates are the most successful become the leading party.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays