“A Single Migration from Africa Populated the World, Studies Find” Questions
How is this account different from what is in the textbook?
This account emphasizes on the fact that all human species originated from Africa, and many statements are Afrocentric. In the textbook, the author rarely focuses on the similarity between species, but mainly on the diverse groups of hominids and other species. The book explains the various cultures, habitats and fossil records of hominids and how they relied on hunter-gathering and then subsistence farming to survive. However, there is a big difference in the dates between the article versus the textbook. For example, the article states that humans evolved in Africa roughly 200,000 years ago, approximately 198,000BC .However, the textbook states that modern humans appeared in 8000,BC.
2. Do new findings overall support or disagree with the textbook account? …show more content…
The article states “modern humans evolved in Africa roughly 200,000 years ago(198,000BC)”, while the textbook says modern humans first appeared around 8000 BC. However, both the textbook and today's findings agree that we all originated from the continent of Africa, share a common ancestor/location of origin, and migrated as means to survive.
3. Which groups of humans left Africa and when? Which stayed?
New findings say that the ancestors of KhoiSan hunter-gatherers left Africa 200,000 years ago and were fully isolated by 100,000 years ago.The Khoi San descendants continue to live in southern Africa. All modern humans left Africa at some point in time, and astonishingly, after the last wave of modern humans that migrated out of Africa, descendents of the 1st wave completely disappeared.
4. What is unusual about the Aborigines of Australia and the people of Papua, New
How is this account different from what is in the textbook?
This account emphasizes on the fact that all human species originated from Africa, and many statements are Afrocentric. In the textbook, the author rarely focuses on the similarity between species, but mainly on the diverse groups of hominids and other species. The book explains the various cultures, habitats and fossil records of hominids and how they relied on hunter-gathering and then subsistence farming to survive. However, there is a big difference in the dates between the article versus the textbook. For example, the article states that humans evolved in Africa roughly 200,000 years ago, approximately 198,000BC .However, the textbook states that modern humans appeared in 8000,BC.
2. Do new findings overall support or disagree with the textbook account? …show more content…
The article states “modern humans evolved in Africa roughly 200,000 years ago(198,000BC)”, while the textbook says modern humans first appeared around 8000 BC. However, both the textbook and today's findings agree that we all originated from the continent of Africa, share a common ancestor/location of origin, and migrated as means to survive.
3. Which groups of humans left Africa and when? Which stayed?
New findings say that the ancestors of KhoiSan hunter-gatherers left Africa 200,000 years ago and were fully isolated by 100,000 years ago.The Khoi San descendants continue to live in southern Africa. All modern humans left Africa at some point in time, and astonishingly, after the last wave of modern humans that migrated out of Africa, descendents of the 1st wave completely disappeared.
4. What is unusual about the Aborigines of Australia and the people of Papua, New