A Short Summary On Active And Passive Euthanasia

Decent Essays
icole Rodriguez
Reading Response #11
According to the Congregational Sacrament, life is a God’s gift given to us to preserve and find something meaningful. For that reason, when somebody tries to kill themselves, we see them as sinners because they are challenging with the sovereignty of God’s rule and loving plan. However, the Congregation Sacrament also voices that life is meant to be happy and fruitful for everyone. This is a contradiction to what most people with terminal illness experienced at the end of their lives. For example, in an Individual Case of Decision Making, the author describes the life of a women named Diane, who suffers from Leukemia and who intends to die. Even though, the author (who is also her physician) struggles to understand why Diane wants this hasty decision,
…show more content…
Rachel argues that there are currently two different forms of euthanasia: passive and active euthanasia. In passive euthanasia, the person does nothing to improve its health, which brings its own death. Meanwhile, in active euthanasia, a physician directly intervenes with a patient’s life. Despite that in the story, Diane’s death is a form of passive euthanasia because her physician did not hasten her death, her story brings light to the multiple issues for why should we consider legalizing all types of euthanasia. First, patient with terminal illnesses, like Diane suffer from excruciating pain and agony that no physician or family members can help. That said, if a patient is only suffering from their terminal illness, its morally wrong and unethical to forced them lived a life full of suffering and misery. Also, all individuals in the US uphold inherent legal rights that protects and guarantees civil liberties for all. Similarly, if patients like Diane wishes to die to preserve their liberties, we should allow them because it fulfills their legal rights as

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is morally good to respect a person’s autonomy as well as the wishes of a patient whom has indicated their intent in wanting to not continue their suffering, perhaps as expressed with a DNR order. In the instance of a patient on life support, they can request to be taken off of these life-supporting machines, and die; a case of passive euthanasia. In his article “Active and Passive Euthanasia”, author James Rachels argues that from a moral standpoint, there is no difference between active and passive euthanasia or killing someone and letting someone die. For Rachels, the decision of inaction is an action in it of itself, and overall the outcome of both is ultimately the same: the death of the patient, although active euthanasia is more merciful to the patient (Rachels). Bailey experiences a loss of autonomy in functioning as a human being without aid from others.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1973, the American Medical Association made an official statement on the topic of euthanasia. The AMA said that the intentional end of a life, or “mercy killing”, is a direct contradiction to what the medical profession stands for, but they said that the end of extraordinary means to keep someone alive is permitted. Rachel says that the statements leads to a distinction between intentionally killing and letting die. While this distinction is a big one, Rachel says thats its an morally unimportant one.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is illegal and needs to be legalized to help the patients who are in pain. The patient should have more of an opinion in this than the family. The patient's family might want them to keep them alive, not realizing how much pain the family member is in. There are many reasons why these people deserve to have a choice, some of which include; It saves lives, It opens up spaces in the hospital for curable, serious disease patients, and these patients could be used…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding the topic of ‘death with dignity’, the legalization of PAS and euthanasia offers terminally ill patients self-autonomy, and as will be shown, gives them comfort, confidence, and closure. A person’s last moments on earth should not be spent needlessly suffering from severe physical pain. Terminally ill patients become dependent on other people for their nutrition, hydration, and hygiene (Levin). Instead of spending time in discomfort, the terminally ill should be at rest. The process deserves to be joyful and respectful.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a loved one’s frail body lying prone on a hospital bed. They have less than six months to live, and they are helpless to do anything except lie there in immense pain. Every night they plea for a quick death, but it never comes. The law ensures their death will be slow and painful; however, there may still be hope. In 1994, Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act which legalized the use of euthanasia (“Physician-Assisted” 833).…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, Oregon, Washington, Vermont, New Mexico, and Montana are the only states where it is legal to medically assist suicide. The question and debate is, should we legalize assisted suicide everywhere else? Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne, believes we should. By portraying the story of Gillian Bennett, an old woman who suffered of dementia and decided to end her life this way, he demonstrates how the act of physician assisted suicide is not an unmoral choice. He believes it is a right for everyone to choose to end his or her life, rather than going through intolerable suffer.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “ Active and Passive Euthanasia,” by James Rachel he makes the argument that there is nothing morally wrong with Passive Euthanasia that’s given to be acceptable. Passive Euthanasia letting someone die becoming permissible is an acceptance Rachel proves from the behalf standards of medical reasons. Medical reasons doctors can take out tubes, respirator, etc.. “Letting go” is a decision making doctors do for the patient to die having no pain of suffrage anymore. It’s not a consequence for causing a death on purpose, “ the matter of life and death is being decided on irrelevant grounds.” (Rachel, p.290).…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Controversies have been revolving around the reckless outcomes in the legality of euthanasia. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is the implementation of dismissing a life with a terminal illness or intolerable suffering. In the levels of morality and professionalism, it is ludicrous to assist termination of one’s life, especially in a passive or involuntary way. Legalization of euthanasia has proven higher levels of convictions in non-voluntary euthanasia. Thus, the United States as well as many other countries around the world, have developed a negative reputation from controversial cases surrounding assisted suicides.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The discussion on physician-assisted death (PAD) and euthanasia has been fenced with controversy whether by the media or in philosophy. Considerably, the arguments that surround this issue has increased periodically due to the fact that health care and medicine has evolved continuously to safeguard not just patients and families, but all health care providers as well. Physician assisted death is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Westefeld et al., 2013, p. 539). Oftentimes, PAD is erroneously used interchangeably with euthanasia. According to Dieterle, euthanasia occurs when the active instigator of death is the physician.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, it will be argued that there is a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. The distinction is that active euthanasia is the direct involvement of action that cause someone to die. However, passive euthanasia is the inaction of allowing someone to die by not doing something that would prolong the patient’s life. I cannot agree with James Rachel argument of “the bare difference between killing and letting die does not, in itself, make a moral difference,” because killing in active euthanasia and letting one die in passive euthanasia can be differentiate in the notion of the principle cause, intent, and motive of the action vs inaction (Vaughn, 2017).…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it true that people think it’s not morally right to kill a person, but that it’s morally acceptable to let them die? James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if passive euthanasia is permissible, then active euthanasia should also be. In medical ethics, the distinction between both euthanasias are highly controversial, yet passive euthanasia is accepted and practiced by a majority of doctors. Despite critical conditions to one’s medical case, the majority of people believe active killing is morally worse than letting one die.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passive Euthanasia Summary

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The article by author James Rachel is a crucial criticism to the doctrine accepted by the doctors that is endorsed in a statement by the American Medical Association. The main argument is challenging the conventional doctrine of using passive euthanasia i.e. letting the patient die then active euthanasia i.e. killing the patient directly, even though the latter one is considered more humane than the former. He supports this argument by saying that for a patient with an incurable disease, it is better to kill the patient saving them from the pain and suffering, rather then just ceasing the treatment and letting them suffer until they die. Secondly, the author argues that conventional doctrine leading to their decisions is based on irrelevant…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays