A Rhetorical Analysis Of Paintball

The logos presented are strongly appealing to the audience. Team sports like basketball, soccer, and ultimate frisbee. Taylor shows that it can have great outcome and benefit, so can paintball. The problem with finding that paintball doesn’t usually reward violence is the lack of finding support. As Taylor exclaims “a nice dark bruise” is an outcome. Damaging each other purposely usually and rightly is considered violent behavior. Realizing that players do agree to the terms, living in a war zone people and animals living in those situations don't have the choice to stay or leave there location. While paint balling influences the act of war more than the common sports that are played. Ross did legitimize parts of the dispute that paintball connects sports by sharing aspects of athleticism, and the benefits that come from each sport. From all sports that you can get bruises, paintball has the same outcome. By Separating human characteristics and trying to defend paintball is lack the rhetorical concept. …show more content…
The strong suits of their approach and extent of experience lend credibility. He asserts that Americans can relate to mental challenges worth gaining as well as physical fitness, collaboration, and how it holds its fun. He also pursues to contemplate some sort of criticisms, the two which he applies that opponents of their position generally mention. These are the possible violence and danger of the sport. Taylor asserts some examples that help well with the well being of others and how paintball is safe to play. For example, the people who don't wear the right equipment like eye protection can get hurt even though the reports are very rare. But, when its time to contemplate on violent issues their critical thinking comes to a