Advantages And Disadvantages Of Search Warrant

Improved Essays
Arrest warrants are issued to allow the police to identify and locate a person, or persons. These persons are usually those who have been previous arrest, released on bail, but then fail to show up to court after their release, in contrast a search warrant allows the police to enter into a promise, in search of evidence or contraband that may be used in an upcoming trial. In order to take possession of an item, and that property to be searched it must be specifically listed in the search warrant. The police are limited to only what is indicated in the warrant after its approved by a judge. ( John Worrall. 2013). The three components of an arrest or search warrant is, it must be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. There must be …show more content…
The police must determine a crime happened and establish probable cause from there, it is irrelevant where the suspect in question is currently located. The location of the suspect to be arrested has no bearing on whether or not he/she committed the alleged crime. Therefore, the police establishing probable cause as to the suspect 's location is unneeded. Search warrants are issued upon probable cause to include any areas in which items sought after can be found. Hypothetically speaking, An officer creates a search warrant for evidence related to, a financial scheme. He seeks authorization to search the suspect 's home and any evidence which would connect the suspect to the scheme. The officers walk into the home, and search every inch of the house, and find bundles of cocaine in the bathtub. The law enforcement agent seizes the drugs because they are now in plain view of his search. He was searching for paperwork in relation to a financial scheme the officer now arrest the book the suspect for possession of an illegal substance, with intent to sell, which is a completely unrelated crime. In this example you see that, a warrant stating exactly what they are looking for is needed so that law enforcement agents can 't walk into a residence and search in hopes of finding something illegal regardless to if it 's connected to a crime or not. There is no reason to believe that the paperwork he was seeking should have been located in the bathtub. The evidence found and obtained should be suppressed. This prevents officers from conducting full-blown searches and instead only focus on the crime and the items they are looking for, and for which they have probable cause

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Aguilar-Spinelli Test

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essence of lawfully securing the ability to invade and search someone else’s property to look for evidence of a crime, two approaches have been examined. One being the totality of circumstance approach which states that all facts and circumstances in the given situation should be looked at in each case individually, meaning that the whole picture needs to be examined in order to determine if there is probable cause to enter someone’s property for searches and seizures; the other approach being the Aguilar-Spinelli two pronged test, which was developed in Aguilar v. Texas and Spinelli v. United States and the two requirements were that, “The magistrate must be informed of the reasons to support the conclusion that such an informant is…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue- Whether it was reasonable under the 4th amendment for the officers to enter a home without a warrant. Rule- Knock and Announce rule law enforcement has to knock and announce that they are police and wait a reasonable amount of time, usually seconds, before entering place before they search. (Wilson v Arkansas)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case presented, obtaining a search warrant would comes down to the key factor of proving probable cause. To do so, evidence of a possible operation must be at least reasonable. To find this needed evidence, it would be best to go undercover to learn the inner workings of the operation. For example, one way to find this evidence would be to portray a human trafficker.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    .When it comes to getting arrested the police can do it two ways, they can do it with a warrant or without one. However both must have probable cause. The fourth amendment is what protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The two important thing with this amendment is the requirements of probable cause to get a warrant and it how it prohibits unreasonable search and seizures.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In chapter six, the author examines searches for evidence. The fourth amendment commands the use of warrants. As previously stated, warrants usually consist of three elements to meet the fourth amendment standard. I believe the knock and announce rule is truly effective procedure because this standard can protect officers from injury and more than likely preserve physical evidence from being destroyed. This is also a valuable tool in preventing a high risk target from escaping the scene.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a) Consent to Search In R v. Wills (1992) the court found the following criteria necessary for a valid consent search: 1. There was consent, expressed or implied; 2. The giver of the consent had the authority to give the consent; 3. The consent was voluntary (not police coerced); 4. The giver of consent was aware of the police conduct; 5.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper argues that the Fourth Amendment effects law enforcement. In criminal cases, it is important that there is substantial evidence to reach a verdict. For the prosecution to obtain such evidence, they must perform a search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable and unlawful search and seizures. It states that people have the right to secure their person and property from search and seizure without a warrant.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dk Dbq Analysis

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the search was done from outside of the home, it did not reveal any of the activities inside of this house. (Doc. C) According to Justice John Paul Stevens, “The officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly reasonable…”. The imager did not go through the walls of the home, therefore it was not a search and did not require a warrant. (Doc. F)…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What´s Probable Cause?

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The basic requirements for obtaining search warrants begin with probable cause. Probable Cause is the level of suspicion that must be reached under the Fourth Amendment in order to issue a search warrant (Hall, 2014). Probable cause can be based on an officers training, experience, and the totality of the circumstances. Totality of the circumstances can include statements, observations, and evidence, which can include hearsay (Hall, 2014). Probable cause is a higher suspicion than reasonable suspicion and is a level that would cause a reasonable and prudent person to believe that a crime has been, is being, or is going to be committed and the person(s) in question is responsible for the crime.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A warrantless entry and search for a suspect and to help victims in emergency circumstances is also permitted. Officers can secure evidence in emergency situations if the officers have reasonable belief the evidence will be destroyed in circumstances when there is no time to secure a warrant from a judge or magistrate. Plain view and consent given by the legal owner is also a cause for warrantless search and seizure procedures. Although the burden of proof to afford a warrantless search and seizure must be proven, given the totality of the circumstances involved (Brooks,…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The warrant should describe specifically the place to be searched and the person or object that needs to be seized. The fourth amendment is to protect citizens of the United States from having their homes and or possessions being taken from the government. It also prevents the search of private homes and businesses without a good reason. Police officers are allowed to search a home or business if illegal materials are in plain sight. Police officers can also search a home or business if the owner of the home or business grants permission to the police to search.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The police officers usually handcuff occupants while searching location or vehicle, for their safety (Ferdico, Fradella, & Totten, 2013). There are a few different people who can issue a search warrant. They are justice of the peace, complaint judges, clerks of court, but the main ones are usually judges and magistrates. The person who signs off on the search warrant has to be neutral, detached from the case, and capable of determining if a search warrant should be issued.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fourth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees that there will be no unlawful searches or seizures. However, under Supreme Court ruling, this amendment is not applied in school. In other words, government officials are lawfully allowed to search you and your belongings without a warrant of any kind. The reasoning to this is because there is a heightened need to keep areas of learning and teaching safe. Recently courts have expanded the Supreme Court’s ruling to lawfully allow school officials to conduct these searches.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Search and seizure laws have been around since the beginning of the United States of America, and have a very controversial history. Many deem the way the laws are practiced unconstitutional, and oppressive to minorities, while others think they are just and need to be carried out to stop crime. Police officers have found many missing persons and have also brought down many drug dealers all while staying in the lines of legal search and seizure. Many people fear officers can overstep their boundaries and think that search and seizure laws are the underlying cause of mass incarceration, which Michelle Alexander examines in her book The New Jim Crow.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays