Theranos has unsuccessfully met its value propositions, which brings us to the company’s current net worth; almost zero.
Theranos seemed to satisfy an unmet clinical need by refining a …show more content…
In 2003, the price seemed to be the best value proposition but in 2014 it wasn’t anymore because the Centers for Mediccare & lucy-sienna-2954 - ALS320 F16 S2 - A2D1. Page 2 of 5
Medicad Services (CMS) found numerous deficiencies in Theranos’s testing such as tests falling outside the normal range (5). In March 2009, a study investigated people’s fear of needles in a southeast Queensland community and only twenty-two people reported fear of needle. The only way to get over this fear is through graded exposure and when it comes time to do a surgery, if people are still afraid of needles, they can suffer psychological side effects. Theranos’s tests might have been cheap but it doesn’t cover for the inaccurate test results. By 2014, a third of
Theranos’s tests required more than a prick of blood so clearly this value proposition did not hold. Theranos attempted to “disrupt” the market by making it possible for someone to not have to go through a central laboratory to obtain test results. Theranos’s prides itself for