Summary Of A Plea For Pure Science

Superior Essays
In the mid-19th century, a young child by the named of Henry Augustus Rowland was developing his own desires for fundamental research. These ambitions were fueled by the complications he faced as a result of his religious family. Employing his adversity, Rowland later advanced to become a renowned scientist to revolutionize not only the design of spectroscopy but also the perception of scientific research in the late 19th century. He redirected his suppressions of the world to further develop this study of “pure science,” the understanding that science should focus on research for the advancement of knowledge. This concept of science had been forgotten and masked by the working world of the 19th century. Rowland found purpose to proclaim that …show more content…
While in the vice-president position of this association, Rowland developed a speech intended for the scientists willing to promote a more effective way of researching. This group consisted of scientists dedicated to improving the way scientific research was conducted in America. Rowland’s purpose for delivering this speech was to provide the indistinguishable evidence of wrongly-researched science that was concealed during the 19th century as a result of the working world. Ultimately, he wanted to encourage positive development towards the motives and ambitions of American science. In his speech A Plea for Pure Science, Rowland addresses the scarcity of “pure science” in the American community. Through this address, he interprets the study of science as two concepts: applied science and “pure science.” Applied science was understood by Rowland as a manipulate amenity that was hindering the progress of American science, while “pure science” contradicted these impediments. Through “pure science,” advancements in the study of nature were conducted; whether on a physical or molecular level, this aspect of science was intended to expand the knowledge of science. Rowland encouraged the study of “pure science” considering the immense possibilities that were yet to be discovered during that period. Obstructing these advancements were professors’ wrongly-influenced perceptions of the study of science. Most American scientists that Rowland observed were utilizing science for commercial applications, not only stalling the progression of science but also influencing students to do the same. He continues by explaining that the reduction of pure science within the science community is a direct result of the lack of effort within the professors and universities involved with educating the student. Rowland encourages professors and other scientists

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Little Leaguer Case Study

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. When a biologist faculty member as Wilson’s University “waived his hand dismissively,” what did is gesture signify? When the Biologist “waived his hand dismissively,” at Wilson, I believe that this was a way of “looking down” on Wilson’s “soft” science area of practice. Why did Wilson refer to himself as a “Little Leaguer”?…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientist suffer from being overshadowed by the things that happen on accident, throwing years of hard work down the drain. According to the article "In Praise of Careful Science", Scientist John Denker said that many "big discoveries" were actually invented step by step. Scientists work tirelessly to discover stuff such as magnetrons and radar, and then one more person comes along and finds out that they can cook food, and they get all the credit. Most errors do not lead directly to discoveries, in fact, Thomas Edison said that inventing is 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Influenza In the excerpt from his book “The Great Influenza” John M. Barry, characterizes scientific research as “grunt” and “tedious” work, highlighting that scientists must acquire courage to accept and embrace uncertainty. Barry develops his ideas by utilizing an extended metaphor comparing the unknown and the known, antithetical ideas of uncertainty and certainty, and rhetorical questions to mirror the thought process a scientists encounters. Using references from scientists Claude Bernard and Einstein, Barry bolsters his thesis by establishing ethos to emphasize that a scientist requires courage to “embrace-uncertainty.” Barry’s ostensible audience are scientists because he opens and closes the excerpt by directly addressing…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Written by Anonymous If someone were to question the relationship between the fields of science and the humanities, a common answer would probably be that the two could not be farther apart. After all, while the former focuses on reason and what is observable, the latter abandons these principles for introspectiveness, and what we cannot observe. Yet, the gap that divides the two schools of thought is unnecessary. While society upholds science as the dominant method of inquiry, it could not survive without the humanities, and vice versa.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Skorton, in the article “Why Scientists Should Embrace Liberal Arts”, argues that scientists must supplement their science and engineering education with a study of the humanities to effectively inform the populous. Through the humanities, Skorton believes scientists can develop a better understanding of the human conditions, thus better emotionally connecting with people lacking a scientific background. Skorton’s article contributes a perspective towards solving a larger problem of the drift between the scientific community and the general public’s perception of scientific truth, particularly the scientific truths that inform politically charged debates. Skorton effectively aggrandizes the scientific community as potential saviors of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Women in Science” “Women in Science,” written by K.C. Cole was published in December 1981 in The New York Times Magazine. In the article Cole’s primary argument is that the lack of women in field is the cause of the negative effects that the science label bestows upon women. The evidence “I didn’t realize what an odd creature a woman interested in physics” (Line 7). The authors tone presents the confusion as to why there is a displacement with women in this field. The author vaguely implies her friends personal experience and highlights the consequences of her having a science major.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebecca Skloot, in the second part of the “Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks”, extensively examines the relationship of science with the non-scientific and indicates the reality of the scientific community. Basically, the reading explicates the consequences, both within and outside science, of the research enthusiasm of the scientists. Humans are classified in terms of their ability and regularity of exercising science. This categorization is quite different from those based on identity such as gender, race etc.: the latter is tied to a person since (s)he is born and is not detachable, while a reputable rank in the former is attained through material efforts.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Canon”, written by Natalie Angier, a variety of interesting stories are used to prove that science is not something that can be learned but is a mindset. Angier confirms this by using examples from…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scientific Revolution Dbq

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, scientists work became widely known, and controversial to the Catholic Church’s beliefs. The scientific revolution occurred during the seventeenth century, which was a revolution in ways of thinking. Technological innovations during this period changed the way people lived in the future. Scientific experimentation led to discoveries that went against the Catholic Church’s beliefs. Scientists during these times had to try to align their works with the Church’s teachings, otherwise they were punished based on what their experiments resulted.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The sharp contrast created between the world as it is habitually seen and how a scientist sees it reveals how unclear and indeterminate the scientific process is. Being so different from how most people see the world, it is as if the perspective of a scientist is one that has pulled from a children’s fantasy novel, characterizing the world of science as unpredictable and even fantastical. Looking at the world through a scientific lends warps one’s perspective of it, allowing for the exploration of the fine details of life through science. In conclusion, everything becomes an opportunity for discovery and everything that seemed to be set in stone can still be…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Specter’s TED Talk “The Danger of Science Denial,” is an argument on why the scientific method is great and why it is an important part of the society. According to Specter, science has been the transformative force, which has remarkably improved the society in the last thousands of years. He argues that this happens to be the best time in society, in terms of mobility, wealth, health, and opportunities. However, science has been at the center of increased suffering for billions of societies across the world, with the rise of hunger. He argues that science has led to the degradation of land, which has then led to suffering for some parts of the society.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Barry’s, The Great Influenza, Barry characterizes scientific research as uncertain and challenging because it beckons the passionate and determined into the unknown. Barry illuminates the uncertainty that accompanies scientific research, and the importance of embracing that uncertainty with passion, in order to inform the reader of the characteristics of a scientist. When introducing the necessary steps it takes to become a courageous scientist it is proven that, “uncertainty makes one tentative if not fearful.” Barry candidly characterizes scientist needing passion, patience, and vigor when embarking upon research. This anaphora contrasts the scientific process through repetition by showcasing uncertainty as seemingly negative; but…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mohammad Gumma Mrs. Staton AP European History 14 October 2015 Prompt: Evaluate the extent to which political and social factors affected the work of scientists in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. The Restrictions and Magnetisms of Scientific Efforts Throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, there was an emergence of new fundamentals and a modernized view of the natural world. This period came to be established as the Scientific Revolution.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this passage from The Great Influenza, by John M. Barry, the use of figurative language, imagery, anaphora and parallelism, symbolism and exclusionary tone words to characterize scientific research as a dynamic, tedious, and calculated field of study that requires a variety of personality traits including curiosity, patience, and creativity. Moreover, uncertainty is identified as a central theme and elaborated on as being a necessary part to the process of scientific experimentation. Throughout this essay, Barry uses figurative language, such as extended metaphor, to downplay the severity of decisions that scientists face. For instance, “Would a pick be best, or would dynamite work better- or would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive?”…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paradigms “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” introduced Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm theory. Paradigms describe the scientific observations of a natural phenomenon or theory (Kuhn 2012, 41). Thomas Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” provides a philosophical look into the scientific process and an understanding of how theories change and progress over time. Paradigms help explain theories, concepts, and observations so they can be learned from (Kuhn 2012, 43).…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays