In Anthropology , we are constantly looking for answers. Always in deep research to have a perfect understanding of life and it’s surrounding. Even if we aren’t Anthropology majors, we are all anthropologist in a weird way. As we are always so curious of our surroundings and sometimes do our own research , even if it’s just asking our peers or doing online research , we are analyzing our topic of research and stepping out of our element to lead us to answers we may want. and bring our self more knowledge the subject of importance at the moment.
Nobody likes to be compared to a monkey but not knowing that we are closely related to monkeys. Some may even consider monkey and humans cousins. Clearly we are extremely different from monkeys like …show more content…
As stated on the textbook “regardless of which theory (single- origins, multiregional, or intermediate) is correct, it seems clear that Neandertals and modern humans (H. sapiens sapiens) coexisted in Europe and Near East for at least 20,000 years, and maybe as long as 60,000 years.”they were also known to have a lot of similarities. As stated on livescience.com ,on the article Neanderthals: Facts About Our Extinct Human Relatives “The American Museum of Natural History states that other differences from humans are a flaring, funnel-shaped chest, a flaring pelvis, and robust fingers and toes. Their brains, however, grew at a similar rate to humans’ and were about the same size or larger. “ it has been debated whether to just consider neanderthals part of the homo sapiens species or have them both stand individually since they come so close in comparison. Of course homo sapiens are much more modern than neandertals. According to the textbook Anthropology “ Boule’s reconstruction of a Neandertal, as displayed at chicago’s field museum in 1929, illustrates how subjective fossil re-constructions can be. It falsely implies that Neandertals could not stand upright or straighten their knees, and that they were more primitives than we know today.” It is not really known how Neandertals really became extinct. The theory is that they interbred with humans but it’s not proven as of
Nobody likes to be compared to a monkey but not knowing that we are closely related to monkeys. Some may even consider monkey and humans cousins. Clearly we are extremely different from monkeys like …show more content…
As stated on the textbook “regardless of which theory (single- origins, multiregional, or intermediate) is correct, it seems clear that Neandertals and modern humans (H. sapiens sapiens) coexisted in Europe and Near East for at least 20,000 years, and maybe as long as 60,000 years.”they were also known to have a lot of similarities. As stated on livescience.com ,on the article Neanderthals: Facts About Our Extinct Human Relatives “The American Museum of Natural History states that other differences from humans are a flaring, funnel-shaped chest, a flaring pelvis, and robust fingers and toes. Their brains, however, grew at a similar rate to humans’ and were about the same size or larger. “ it has been debated whether to just consider neanderthals part of the homo sapiens species or have them both stand individually since they come so close in comparison. Of course homo sapiens are much more modern than neandertals. According to the textbook Anthropology “ Boule’s reconstruction of a Neandertal, as displayed at chicago’s field museum in 1929, illustrates how subjective fossil re-constructions can be. It falsely implies that Neandertals could not stand upright or straighten their knees, and that they were more primitives than we know today.” It is not really known how Neandertals really became extinct. The theory is that they interbred with humans but it’s not proven as of