Priest Realist – Philosopher

Great Essays
Priest — Physicist — Philosopher A priest, a physicist, and a philosopher go into a bar … ostensibly, to consider principles of religion and science. One is an idealist. One is a materialist. One is a pragmatist. One is a religious scientist; but which one is which?
— The physicist wonders how the universe works, but never asks why, because, to ask why is to become a metaphysician.
— The philosopher thinks he knows why, but never asks how it works, for to ask how requires one to become a mathematician.
— The priest may know who, when, what, where and why, but not how to make life work out the way one wishes, for that is the supposed secret of magicians.
— The idealist perceives volition and consciousness in the organizing Intelligence that is evident in the physical universe. Idealists do not necessarily believe in superstitions, divine intervention, or the mental manipulation, abrogation or nullification of Law through prayer; however much they may hope for such possibilities.
…show more content…
Materialists do not perceive a divine purpose at work in life, and generally do not endorse religion, except, perhaps, various forms of material-ism: humanism, environmentalism, secularism, social/political activism, etc.
— The pragmatist takes a practical, and somewhat experiential, approach to the study of reality, discovering how to apply a principle, but not necessarily why. Pragmatists are more interested in the effectiveness of a principle, than in its theoretical and theological

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Science and scientific investigators must doubt themselves and question everything, and this inquisitive behavior is shown by the great scientists in the past. Barry uses allusions to the works of famous scientists to show that even the greats from the past have the same characteristics of questioning everything that successful scientists today have. John M. Barry first alludes to a great psychologist from the nineteenth century named Claude Bernard who “said ‘science teaches us to doubt’” (Barry). By referencing Claude Bernard, Barry shows the audience that scientists doubting themselves is not a new concept.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, ladies and gentlemen when we hear the word pig, we think of greed, filth and ugliness but this is just a stereotype due to the derogatory nature Ignorance is truly bliss. Good morning, adjudicator, chairperson ,opposing team and members of the audience. It truly is better to be a happy pig when compared to an unhappy philosopher. An unhappy philosopher can be compared to the old fable named the fox and the grapes.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facing the uncertainty of the natural world, scientists seek to order observable phenomena with structured methodology. Scientific research explains the unknown and provides humanity with a better understanding of the universe. However, the process of decoding the vast unknown is long and arduous; scientists tasked with unravelling the mysteries of the universe must be dedicated to the process and resilient to failure. In The Great Influenza, John M. Barry characterizes scientific research as a noble endeavor only worthy of those of great intelligence and passionate resolve. Barry Utilizes juxtaposition and extended metaphor to present scientific research as a difficult but enlightening process.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Phyllis Wright, a sixth grade student, asks Albert Einstein if scientists prayed if so what for. Einstein replies in an appropriate manner for the subject and his audience, while appealing to logos, ethos, and pathos. Although Einstein’s letter does not directly answer Phyllis’s question, it is still rhetorically effective. Einstein appeals to logos when discussing the nature of scientific research. He addresses the counter argument in saying that “scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by the laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the actions of people.”…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Epilogue of An Elementary Christian Metaphysics by Owens, the author summarizes what was argued and discussed throughout the book. The crucial points that were discussed in this section include the definition of Metaphysics, Christian Metaphysics and how it contrasts to Christianity, as well as its status in science and the subject of Metaphysics. Overall, Owens provided a conclusion of his arguments that summarized what the Metaphysics course is about and how it is understood and determined. Metaphysics is a deep understanding of what a being is and how it relates to the universe, how it leads to the supernatural and explains how metaphysics is a science.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Western philosophy began in the 6th century BCE in ancient Greece. These first philosophers that we know of are called “Pre-Socratics”, meaning they came before Socrates. Socrates’ philosophical prowess, however, brought forth a time that freedom of self-consciousness was first challenged. In my opinion, Socrates was the first philosopher to distinguish the value of philosophy even though they were just mere thoughts of men. In Bertrand Russell’s “The Value of Philosophy”, he addresses the very nature of philosophy itself.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Baxter and Witmer, in their books “The Reformed Pastor”,” The Shepherd Leader”, argue about how to be a good leader in a biblical way for Maturate Pastoral Ministry. While Baxter describes from his own point of view, Witmer harmonizes with Baxter including other points. Firstly, in this essay, we will be comparing and contrast, Timothy Witmer’s framework for leadership with his “old shepherd friend” Richard Baxter in The Reformed Pastor (1657) Secondly, we are going to Evaluate Witmer’s framework for leadership in which extant is biblical, practical and relevant to my personal context. Finally, there will be a Self-assess of my personal leadership in the church and home against this (modified) framework, with explaining strength and…

    • 1323 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Universe Next Door” by James Sire provides insight into the various opposing worldviews society faces today. Beginning with the Pre-Modern thoughts that believe in God’s existence, spanning to the Modern view placing matter in the center of reality, and concluding with the Postmodern thoughts which deny the existence of reality. Throughout the semester we have discussed several of these viewings of the world, noting some views appear to be more practical than others. With the use of Sire’s eight fundamental questions I would like to compare and contrast the Pre-Modern thoughts of the Christian Theistic worldview to the Modern thoughts of the Naturalistic worldview. Beginning with Sire’s first question “what is prime reality-the really…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Idealism and truth are related concepts with the similar functions, but can have different effects on a person’s life. Idealism is a what protects an individual’s state of mind, and gives power to endure a situation. However, when that state of mind is shattered so is a piece of a person. This leads to a series of detrimental choices that leads to the person’s downfall. Truth regardless the shape, form, or bluntness is what gives an individual a sense of reality.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some would say that philosophy and the critical thinking that comes with it is as important to the mind and soul as food is to the body. This influence philosophy has on an individual has been argued as having various degrees by innumerable scholars. One such that makes the case for its relevance is Bertrand Russell, in his The Problems of Philosophy, most notably in “Chapter XV: The Value of Philosophy.” In his writings, Russell strongly illustrates the value philosophy holds and the importance in the study of it.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    German philosopher Immanuel Kant, uses his writing Prolegomena to discuss the question, is the study of metaphysics possible and what do we gain from studying or practicing it? Kant evaluates this question by discussing what distinguishes metaphysics from other natural sciences and mathematics. The many sections of this book explore this discussion and provide the necessary arguments to solve this question. Kant comes to a conclusion on the study of metaphysics and ultimately determines that it is a form of pseudoscience, and does not provide us with knowledge. This conclusion challenges the previous understanding and teachings of philosophers of the “school metaphysics” including teachings of Baumgarten.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Rorty, an American philosopher of the late twentieth and early twenty-first century who explored expertise in philosophy and comparative literature into a perspective called “The New Pragmatism” or “neopragmatism.” Rejecting the Platonist tradition at an starting period. Initially he was attracted to analytic philosophy. Rorty’s views were strong when he came to believe from representationalism, this tradition in its own way suffered a lot. He associated with Platonism flaw.…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the choice of research methodology, the researchers first have to choose one of the research paradigms like positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism. Every research approach must follow the way of investigation such as epistemology, ontology, and axiology (Maxwell, 2005) as the essence of research philosophy. Therefore, I would like to follow the viewpoint of pragmatism as my research approach that should overcome some disadvantageous position of positivism and interpretivism, discussed below- Positivism refers to the emphasis on scientific observation as the way to see and understands the reality (Antwi & Hamza, 2015; Mack, 2010; Gray, n.d.) including statistical measurement to gain the factual knowledge about nature and natural phenomena (Edirisingha, 2012). These characteristics of positivism make the researchers independent (Dudovskiy, 2016) with minimal interactions with participants (Wilson, 2010) and limit to the survey method of data collection in observing empirical phenomena (Antwi & Hamza, 2015) rather than introspection (Byrne, 2005). The essence of axiology in positivism, as the researchers' judgment about the phenomena that is to be observed (Saunders et al., 2012), involves inquirer's value–free assessment (Li, 2016).…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays