In essence, he seems to say the opposite of what is actually being conveyed. This may be very amusing for a plethora of readers since there is a strong sense of mystery that is seen. In one part of the proposal, he said that the people within the country of Ireland should not be treated in a harmful way. As a whole, they should not be treated like vicious and caged animals. He actually takes the time to compare the Irish people to animals, but he does not want them to be treated in an ill manner. He actually says the following: “"I rather recommend buying the children alive, and dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs.” This specific part of the proposal is a way to ensure that people understand what he is exactly discussing. In reality, he does not want to buy children alive and roast them like they do to pigs. Instead, he wants them to be treated in a decent manner (Schecter …show more content…
With the truthfulness in the way that the author portrayed himself, he was able to make sure that he community was well aware of the negative occurrences that were taking place on a daily basis. It is unfortunate that many people at the time simply did not have the educational skills to enjoy what was being written. Moreover, while there were some wealthy people who supported Swift’s opinions, there were also many people who did not want any part of it. Most of the people across the country were children and Swift tried his hardest to ensure that they did not have a difficult life the way that most of their parents did. He encouraged them to work together and to work hard so that they can actually become successful people. Swift argued against poverty and over population, however with his use of ingenious tactics, he was able to properly educate those around