The fallacies that Swift uses to support his proposal are clearly wrong, but they aid in showcasing the ridiculousness of his idea and how well-thought-out his essay is. He talks about the population, “I calculate there may be about two hundred thousand couple whose wives are breeders… subtract thirty thousand couple… again subtract fifty thousand…” (36), making the poor just a number in his calculations. Swift also explores the price at which a children could be sold, saying, “I have already computed the charge of nursing a beggar’s child… to be about two shillings per annum, rags included; and I believe no gentleman would repine to give ten shillings for the carcass of a good fat child… the mother will have eight shillings neat profit, and be fit for work till she produces another child” (37). He equates children to money, taking away the humanity of the situation. Swift’s cold and calculating treatment of the situation reflects the uncaring attitude towards the poor at the
The fallacies that Swift uses to support his proposal are clearly wrong, but they aid in showcasing the ridiculousness of his idea and how well-thought-out his essay is. He talks about the population, “I calculate there may be about two hundred thousand couple whose wives are breeders… subtract thirty thousand couple… again subtract fifty thousand…” (36), making the poor just a number in his calculations. Swift also explores the price at which a children could be sold, saying, “I have already computed the charge of nursing a beggar’s child… to be about two shillings per annum, rags included; and I believe no gentleman would repine to give ten shillings for the carcass of a good fat child… the mother will have eight shillings neat profit, and be fit for work till she produces another child” (37). He equates children to money, taking away the humanity of the situation. Swift’s cold and calculating treatment of the situation reflects the uncaring attitude towards the poor at the