A Modern Version Of Descartes Problem

Improved Essays
A modern version of Descartes’ problem is a thought experiment called the ‘brain in a vat’. Hilary Putnam tells us to visualize our mind a human being that “has been subjected to an operation by an evil scientist. The person’s brain…has been removed from the body and placed in a vat of nutrients which keeps the brain alive.” The person’s nerve endings are connected to a computer that allows that person to have the illusion that everything is normal. The illusion lets them believe that there are “people, objects, the sky, etc.; but really, all the person…is experiencing is the result of electronic impulses travelling from the computer to the nerve endings.” If a person was to even raise his hand, the computer is capable of letting him “see”

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes is used his ability to think to ponder the possibilities. If the mind is indeed affiliated with the functioning of the body, then it is plausible for the mind to exist without the body. So to be able to know what is possible here, we first need some self- inflicted excuse to think that the mind is something totally from the body, such as the argument from indivisibility. Even at that point in our reasoning, it’s extremely important that we are still cautious, thus using what we can conceive of as a test of…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of his fourth meditation, Descartes begins reflecting on the three main certainties that he has developed so far: 1) that God exists, 2) that God is not a deceiver, and 3) that God created him and is therefore responsible for all his faculties, including his faculty of judgment. Descartes seems satisfied with the first two convictions, however, he begins to explore the conflict that arises with the third; that, “if everything that is in me comes from God, and he did not endow me with a faculty for making mistakes, it appears that I can never go wrong” (Descartes and Cottingham 38). This dilemma, also known as the “Problem of Error”, prompts the need for Descartes to reconcile the two, seemingly contradictory positions. While…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, Princess Elizabeth’s understanding of causation cannot explain all causal interactions (e.g. the relation of time and the body which causes the process of aging). Therefore, there are some things that we cannot truly comprehend. One of those things, according to Descartes, is the causal relationship between the mind and the body.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mind body problem questions what is the nature of the mind and mental states? How are the mind and the body related? How are mental states related to brain states? Descartes says that there are two kinds of elements in the world, bodies and minds. Descartes believes in interactionism which means minds and bodies intermingle with one another.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Elizabeth asks how the mind can interact with the body if it lies in a different realm of existence. No part of Descartes’ Meditations has a satisfying answer to how two distinct substances can casually affect one another. Elizabeth’s objection seems devastating at first but the problem it calls into question is not an error of logic from Descartes, but one of insufficient explanation. Descartes in his own rebuttal to her may utterly fail to explain the manner in which the mind interacts with the body despite them being separate substances; but this still does not present any logical error. The fact that the mechanism of the interaction is unknown doesn’t prevent them from interacting or existing as distinct.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes Meditation reads as though his thoughts are being spoke aloud, he reaches this formulation through his description of ‘How often, asleep at night, am I convinced of just such familiar events – that I am here in my dressing-gown, sitting by the fire-when in fact I am lying undressed in bed!’ (Descartes’ First Meditation, Reason and Responsibility). It are situations like this which lead Descartes’ to develop his sceptical argument towards our lack of certain knowing if the events we are experiencing are truly occurring. This argument has risen again through Philosophers such as James Pryor and the movie/pop-culture phenomenon The Matrix. While the reasoning follows the same pattern as Descartes the more popular example to use when questioning our experiences is whether or not we can be sure that we are not in The Matrix (a machine run computer simulation that all people believe to be real when in fact the reality is that humanity is being kept in pods and used for an energy source).…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes leaves many weak spots in his argument, Searle chooses probably the most difficult position to articulate. Searle attempts to explain why Descartes’ argument of mind-body distinction is not really an argument at all and that the two traditional default positions of the argument, materialism and dualism, are not accurate representations as to what the real problem is and should be discarded. Searle’s purpose is to destroy any remaining idea of Cartesian dualism and introduce a much better way of thinking about how humans are, a refutation of the default positions and a transition to a more comprehensive view on the…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This establishes the fact that since it is the mind that holds consciousness, it is what can be relied on as opposed to what we experience through our senses since we cannot doubt the mind because the only way to doubt is through the mind itself. Descartes believes with certainty that he exists because he can think without needing a physical body and essentially concludes to “I think, therefore, I am.” The importance of Descartes conclusion of cogito ergo sum is the differentiation of the mind, the body, and consciousness, and how interconnected one is to the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes, especially in his First Meditation, condemns the ability of sensation to provide information about the natural world and humans’ surroundings. Although he believes that humans must trust their senses to understand the obvious, he believes that not all perceptions can be trusted as bodily senses can be deceptive to internal understanding. However, a problem arises: how can one contemplate everything that is perceived around them as false? Certainly, unknown truths must reside in experiences not yet encountered especially those that require interactions with distant places and unfamiliar ideas. Descartes argues that these unfamiliarities are produced by pure introspection, but it can be argued that communication with a superior being allows humans to fully understand their supposed innate ideas.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And thus they exist. Descartes produces an explanation of the deception he has experienced in the past. Claiming it’s his fault because of his misuse of god’s gift, allowing the will to extend beyond the intellect. So under these rules, Descartes has provided a method to examine the problem.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In our discussion of Descartes’ we could say that when he said God we could substitute computer, this does not quite apply in this case, since we are not talking about control or deception but rather perception, which we associate with a sentient being, we cannot use a computer instead. Since I do not believe in God, I also do not believe in the part of his argument where he states that things happen because an Ethereal Being is perceiving them. Without that part of the argument he cannot say why things happen when nobody is around. Without the piece I cannot agree with him. If there were a substitute for God in this case or another explanation for why things happen when nobody is there to perceive them, I would be more inclined to believe him.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays