Electoral Volatility In Democracy

a leader isn 't easy, Leadership needs perseverance, confidence, intelligence and an organized system to where he/she can better operate for the benefit of the community and themselves. A leader need to show a bold stand tall image in front of the community to ensure the community that if any problems arise they would be handled accordingly. A leader will not only make a decision that will benefit him, but as well as the community and their demands. Once the leader has won the people and satisfied the community it will ensure an advantage in the next reelection. However, if the leader does not uphold the responsibilities of an acceptable, honorable, and favorable leader then the consciousness, such as the community 's trust and acceptance …show more content…
Voters reward or punish elected officials by expanding or ending their political careers ,but if voters frequently change their allegiance to who ever they were going to vote for. Then punishing politicians might not diminish future malfeasance. They Tested out this possibility, employ a normal model to assess the effect of electoral volatility on conversely and corruption on electoral volatility. They tested the hypothesized relationship on data drawn from 249 elections across 74 countries. Results show that corruption is indeed there and tempting sectoral volatility, but that volatility has no impact on malfeasance or on virtuous behavior for all that matter. Democracy has many definitions, implications and consequences, but the most important components citizens participations, political equations, civic consciousness, self- realization, decent treatment by authorities, sense of dividual political efficacy and freedom have all been associated with this form of political domination either as a defining feature, or a likely product of it, but they are all contingent and week if citizens cannot hold their rulers responsible for their actions that they take in the public. For example, Lutfur Rahman is one of Britain 's best politicians. Until October, 25, 2010 he was elected as mayor. To his fans he was a hero for sticking up for the poor community. It was his detractor who seen him as East london 's answering to Vladimir Putin (A russian president) who was feeling vindicated, as he was found guilty of using corrupt and illegal practices to make his reelection secure for last year. The type of practices he was involved in were spiritual influence and bardins hid labor rival John Biggs a racist. The mayor election would be re-runned, but the court has banded Rahman from