Role Of Judges And Lawyers In The Legal System

Decent Essays
Name:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:

Role of Judges and Lawyers in the Legal System
The retired Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Earl Burger was the longest serving chief justice in the United States of America during the 20th century. In the year 1969 he was nominated by President Nixon. He took leadership after judicial committee of the senate approved him to the high court. He retired in the year 1986. People remember him as a strong champion of judicial reforms. He established a tool to end segregation called busing, he also wrote his opinions that were used to defined obscenity legally. During his term he strengthened separation of powers in government. He also played a role that would see
…show more content…
Judge wore white wigs, black robes in the lower courts and in the higher courts wore red robes with black markings. This has all changed today as both state and federal courts judges have the freedom to select their own court room dresses. Moreover they choose plain black robes and in some instances female judges sometimes add white collars. There are no rules that dictate what judges and justice must wear in the bench but most of them wear them in a spirit of tradition. This symbolizes that the judges are tasked to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law. The Supreme Court is k now to have a tradition of wearing robes before the listening to oral arguments. They first go to justice robin room, where every justice has a locker wear their robes with assistance of attendants to fasten their …show more content…
They include mediation at times known as conciliation in this process the mediator a neutral third parties help the parties with dispute resolve their own disputes. The advantage of this procedure is that they face no appeal and delays parties are able to continue moving forward. Mini trials, in this setup lawyers and experts present a condensed version of the case to the mangers of the two parties. Arbitration resemble the traditional court system in that the third parties hears both parties arguments and finally imposes a binding decision that is enforceable by court. This method has mostly being used in labor management disputes. Summary jury trial they help the parties assess weakness and strength of the augments this facilitates settlement of disputes. The finally have settlement conferences and early neutral evaluation.. There are advantages of using ADR. Unlike the traditional court system that refers to past mediations looks toward the future. They saves a lot of money, this is because the produce early settlement this reduces the expenses that court would have used and participant would have incurred like attorney’s fees. It saves time as some complicated dispute that lawsuits would have taken years to resolve ADR can resolve them in shorter period of weeks or few months. Through ADR parties are able to express their own concerns and interest while in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    William Wayne Justice, he was a formidable judge that sat on the federal bench in the state of Texas. He brought forth change throughout his years as a judge and some of those changes would be major reform decisions that will change the systems in Texas. He was a judge that made decisions that influenced changes and it was noticed not only in Texas, but throughout the United States. Judge Justice was involved in many controversial cases and reforms that gained attention all over. Not only the cases were controversial, but his decisions were ones that got people talking about him.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For men; the classic suit and tie in the black, dark brown and beige shades for the black men and for the whites…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States adopted the English Common Law and court structure in the early day there were quarter sessions courts and surrogate courts. America was a frontier country, and each colony adapted differently. This all changed during the Constitutional Convention the decision was the separate the federal court and the state court known as the dual court system. Even in today’s society, we are under that same dual court system. A parallel system of criminal justice was formed with this.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the dual court system in the United States, and the structure of the federal court system, and your home state court system. The structure of the American court system has been viewed as complex and confusing as federal and state courts differ in jurisdiction, and types of cases that can be handled at the many different levels. The Supreme Court is the ultimate decision maker in cases that has been appealed regarding decisions made at the lower level of federal and state Supreme Courts. The dual court system operates within the boundaries of the state and federal court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Chief Justice John Roberts The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. The modern Supreme court is As envisioned in Article 3 of the constitution by the framers still the same, one of the 3 branches of government. It does play a more prominent role in our everyday lives than what the framers envisioned it.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burger Vs Nixon

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On June 17, 1972, several months before President Nixon was reelected, burglars had broken into the Democratic National Committee offices in Washington, D.C. These burglars were traced back to the White House. This seemed like Nixon's aides were trying to spy on the Democrats. However President Nixon said he didn't know anything about the Watergate break-in. Law enforcement agents continued to investigate the case, which led them back to Nixon’s chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman in 1973.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Earl Warren was a former governor and politician of California. He became a chief justice in 1953 and led a court that protected rights of the people who were disfavored and showed a “better way”. Warren had previous experience and knowledge of the states’ rights. It was hard for people to understand Warren and the decisions that he made which caused many disagreements and opinions that soon led to his impeachment. He was looked at as one of the most influential Americans to many people during that time based on what he accomplished in his sixteen years as a chief justice.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall: Chief Justice

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages

    John Marshall is most famous for being the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding for 34 years. Some would say he was the greatest chief justice of all time. Being a chief justice was not his only role. He was a lawyer, Federalist, Virginia native, husband, father and to some a national hero. Marshall’s legacy lives on and we are reminded time and time again why he was such a fundamental Supreme Court Chief Justice.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our Federal Court system is primarily composed of three high power jurisdictions that operate much differently than that of the state courts. Federal Courts consist of federal district courts, United States courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States; however, these courts have limitations in cases that solely focus on the Constitution and federal law. Federal district courts are considered general trial courts that consist of over six hundred and seventy-five district court judges nationwide, and they have ranked the lowest courts out of the entire federal court system. United States courts of appeal, however, are ranked second in the system and are composed of six judges on the first circuit and can reach up to twenty-nine…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Rehnquist was appointed by Richard Nixon, in part as a response to the Warren Court’s liberal streak, which he used as a campaign issue. During his confirmation he was met with controversy as it became apparent he in fact disagreed with the precedent set in Borwn v. Board of Education. As an associate Justice he began as states’ rights advocate, which often not only placed Rehnquist not only in the minority, but as a lone dissenter. As time wore on the Court began to become more ideologically centered on the right. It was around this time that Associate Justice Rehnquist became Chief Justice Rehnquist.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren court was a time full of life changing events, whether they were good or bad they affected everyone. Changes were being made quite frequently to civil rights, judicial and federal powers. The Warren court was known for several different things such as: ending racial segregation, putting a stop to prayer in public schools, making the right to privacy very clear through the constitution, and much, much more. Without the Warren court, there is no say on how the United States would be right now. The background of the court is about as important as what happened during the years that it took place.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court structure in the United States is a dual court system. This means that there is a separate federal system and a separate judicial system locally and for each of the states. The United States Supreme Court is the only place where these two systems connect. The courts have jurisdiction which gives them the authority to hear and decide cases. These jurisdictions are composed of the original jurisdiction, which has the authority to hear the case when it is first brought to the courts.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Their answer was to establish multiple new courts at different levels of jurisdiction; including trial, appellate, and supreme court levels. They assigned particular duties and responsibilities to each level of court, from regulating ordinances and city laws to handling minor disputes like property and divorce. One especially important model that was adapted for use in state courts was the New York State Field Code of 1848. This code clarified jurisdictional claims of different issues and gave specifics in the matter of court procedures and regulations. It also established a set of simplified rules for pleadings and how they were to be brought before the court in different situations.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mediator eases the tension by giving everyone a chance to talk and since everyone is given the opportunity to be heard it brings the aggression all the way down so everyone feels like they’re being…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My initial thoughts on this quote were, “What does Hamilton mean by the ‘sword or the purse’?” After reading his quote a few more times, I understood that he was implying that the judicial branch has no authority over the power or the finances of society. It seems that Hamilton felt as if these are the foundations of society and that as long as the judiciary branch has no power over these factors, then it can pose no threat and cause no harm; therefore, being the least dangerous branch. Hamilton is wrong, because while this particular branch may not have direct power over these elements of society, at the end of the day the judicial branch has overview on all laws and the constitutionality of those laws. While each branch has a diverse specific…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays