A Knife Get A Dog But Get Rid Of Guns Analysis

Decent Essays
In ¨Get a knife, Get a dog, but Get rid of guns”, published in 1993, by Molly Ivins in the Fort worth Star-Telegram, she writes about the second amendment and says that firearms should be for people in a well trained militia. Ivins supports her claim by using quote from the amendment. The authors purpose is to persuade people that firearms are dangerous in non emergency uses. Ivins emphasizes a zealous tone in order to appeal her audience to teach people who use guns the precautionary uses of guns.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American history, the topic of gun control has been an argument filled with controversy. There have been a number of traumatic events in the country that involved the use of guns; Because of this, many Americans have become weary to the thought of anyone being able to carry a gun. Over the years, there have been many different stances developed pertaining to this topic. Some believe the Second Amendment should be completely abolished, others believe there should be no restrictions on guns, whatsoever. There is also an opinion in the middle of these two stances; some think by combining the two opposite beliefs and collaborating their ideas, a fair resolution could be made.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every two years more Americans are killed by guns than during the entire fourteen years of the Vietnam War” according to Gregory Orfalea in “Self-Inflicted Carnage” (1). Gregory Orfalea, a credible American author, argues in his article “Self-Inflicted Carnage” that there is a desperate need for modern gun control measures in the United States due to the recent increase of gun violence. Robert A. Levy, chairman of the Cato Institute and co-counsel in District of Columbia v. Heller, on the other hand, states in “Our Core Second Amendment Rights” that gun control measures not only violate the rights protected by the Second Amendment, but would also be ineffective because the government cannot control people nor the firearms that have already been legally distributed to rightful owning citizens. In their articles, both Orfalea and Levy argue their drastically opposing positions on modern-day gun reform because where Orfalea demands immediate control based on recent tragedy, Levy argues that gun regulations will not solve anything because they do not fight the source of the problem--the people. These authors both represent their stances through their opinions on topics such as…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article “Guns a Loaded Argument” by Paul Rosenzweig argues his interpretation of the popular controversy over gun laws in the United States. The author Paul Rosenzweig is an adjunct professor of law at George Mason University. He is also the senior legal research colleague in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, the website in which the article is available. The Heritage Foundation is a research and informative institution that publicizes conservative policy topics that support the principle ideas that the foundation stands for. The author has written this article for a mainly conservative audience of readers to allow people more insight into the intricate issues of gun control.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment gives the citizens of the United States the right to bear arm. Considering the enormity of this right, a heated debate has ensued on whether this right should be restricted. However, in the interest of public safety this right afforded by the bill of rights should be tightly regulated. This viewpoint has been developed through trial and error, after several mass shootings and high murder rates with a fire arms the United States is rendered no option but to restrict the Second Amendment to preserve the safety of the public.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Steve Nolan’s article “25 Reasons Why We Need To Preserve Our 2nd Amendment Right To Keep And Bear Arms,” he explains why we should bear arms, and why we should fight to keep our civil liberty to bear arms. This essay is intended to help the reader become more informed on the right to bear arms, how the media only covers gun related incidents, but not instances where guns have saved people, and how many politicians contort the 2nd amendment to aid them in elections. By uncovering some truths about gun owners, Nolan and many other pro-gun activist can shed some light on the truth behind the 2nd amendment. Nolan can affectively argue ones right to the 2nd amendment through studies, statistics, and personal experiences to produce evidence that supports the right to bear arms. The second amendement of the constitution expresses the right for American citizens to bear, or posess guns.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of the Second Amendment, one controversial issue has been whether the Founding Fathers considered the future use of guns. On the one hand, the federal government argues for stricter regulations towards people who bear arms. On the contrary, the people of the state contend that our rights shall not be infringed. With respect to both parties, stricter gun laws are needed to protect American’s from massacres. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Nation’s public has the right to be able to defend and protect their loved ones and themselves; as well as the right to own a gun for a sense of security. According to Suzanna Gratia, a Texas Legislator “Carrying a gun does not guarantee that you will not get hurt, but it changes the…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most disputed debates in the modern world is over the Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the course of recent years, Americans' support for rigid gun control laws has been declining even as the number of mass shootings is on the ascent. Gun control is a standout amongst the most forcefully divisive issues in the U.S. today. Envision appreciating a film at the theater or eating a dinner at Taco Bell while individuals surrounding you are conveying stacked arms. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be inconceivable, it is conceivable in light of the fact that the second amendment of the United States Constitution gives residents the privilege to have and convey weapons.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns vs People “ Guns don’t kill people; people kill people”. It is a phrase often heard among the opponents to gun control in the United States. Weapons have been seen as an element of subsistence or defense against any threat, and every day we hear or see related violent crimes involving firearms.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, opponents of gun control say that a strict restriction on guns is a violation of their Second Amendment ’s right. In order to find a conclusion to the debate, a balanced approach to gun…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodger D. McGrath is a well-known supporter of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the right to keep and bear arms. He wrote the article “A God-Given Natural Right.” McGrath’s article covers former disarmament, rise in crime, and history of the Second Amendment. His article has convincing reasoning for his intended audience. His targeted patrons are those who fiercely support the right to bear arms, proudly own multiple guns, believe gun restrictions mean complete disarmament, and those whom fear total government takeover.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, author James Cronin explains why he, despite being a liberal, believes in and exercises his gun ownership rights. This essay, in particular, is quite intriguing due to the fact a liberal is supporting the second amendment. The title alone draws in a diverse crowd because it is somewhat paradoxical in today's divided political spectrum. The personal crisis that leads to the author’s support of gun ownership enlightens and resonates with nearly all readers. In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, Cronin successfully presents a persuasive argument for firearms that is convincing to both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays