A Journey Without Direction Study Guide

Superior Essays
A Journey Without Direction The world runs on a set of unwritten rules; these rules are always present so much so that people tend to lose the ability to define them. This set of rules differs from society to society slightly however they generally are similar throughout the world. These unwritten rules known as ethics shape how humans treat one another. Why should we as humans follow rules that are nothing more than a societal mold for how we should act. If it is not illegal to ignore someone is pain or trouble why should ethics, then lead us to help that person. Ethics should be followed because with ethics comes a steadfast moral compass for everyone in a society, a beneficial society for all who follow its path and the self-worth of an …show more content…
While some people might connect the two to hold the same meaning, this separation of morals from ethics is important in explaining how they relate to one another. Tomas Nagel professor of philosophy laid this out perfectly in stating that “[t]he ideas of wrong and right are different from the ideas of what is and is not against the rules” (Nagel 407). While ethics stands on the rules of a societal subconscious those rules do not dictate how an individual’s morals determine their view of right and wrong. Without a strong sense of right and wrong the ethics of a dictator’s regime such as Nazi Germany can overwrite the morals of the populace and coheres the population to ignore its morals for self-preservation. While protecting Jews in Nazi Germany was against the law or ethics of Germany many people still went with their morals and choose to ignore the law. This scenario is a perfect example of why people need a foundation of morals for ethics to be beneficial to the society because without a person’s view of right and wrong ethics in the hands of immoral control would cause a fractured …show more content…
A moral foundation no matter how stable can be seen under every human on the earth. With everyone having their own foundation humanity can stand on solid ground between us all. If society was to imagine a world without that common ground, then the world would truly strive for ethics. To fully understand how much ethics affects the world humanity would lose a key part of what makes us human. The real question we should ask ourselves is what would the world look like without ethics and what would be the direction of our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism says all one has to do is check if their action is in agreement with their societal code to determine if their action is right or wrong. But what if their societal codes are wrong? “Cultural Relativism not only forbids us from criticizing the codes of other societies; it also stops us from criticizing our own” (Rachels 34). Rachels final argument against cultural relativism is that it destroys the idea of moral progress and social change. We could not say that Martin Luther King, Jr. changed society for the better as that would be judging the social standards of another time.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    3. Why is it rational for us to follow the moral rules? 4. Ethical leaders understand that we follow moral rules because of the benefits of working in a place where the rules are accepted. Also to avoid being punished if those rules are broken.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dissimilar from many other moral theories, this principle does not have a set formula involving chronological steps that lead to determination of the morality of an action. Critics argue that it is hard to apply, given the ambiguity of treating one as an end analysis and determination is difficult. For example, if a German man was hiding a Jewish family in his basement during the holocaust, is it morally wrong to lie to an interrogating Nazi? The Principle of Humanity deems it morally wrong due to the fact that the man is treating the officer without respect and as a means of hiding the family. However, most view it morally right to save innocent lives rather than cooperate with Nazis.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance Of Human Values

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ultimately, moral values compel our lives to find out and exemplify those concepts within our personality. 3.2.3.1 TYPES OF VALUES We can talk about universal values, because since human beings lived in society, they have to set up values to guide their behavior towards others. In this regard, honesty, accountability, truth, harmony, teamwork, patience, reverence and peace, among all human are referred as universal values. However, in order to understand them, it is helpful to categorize values according to the following decisive factor: • Personal…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He notes how any society will have certain standards ingrained within its members and that these ingrained morals cannot simply just be forced aside when confronted with a separate society with differing morals. (Williams, 21) Rachels’ relativism argument and Williams’ counter argument are examples of philosophies without a universal moral truth and an argument that debases it. The case of Rachels’ relativism is a little strange in that, while the theory claims to be spreading tolerance of other cultures, the lack of a universal standard to base the moral judgements upon brings up the question of how one would judge their own moral standards. This is especially potent in cases where a culture permits acts such as conquest and genocide-acts that obviously will bring harm to others. The Nazi regime is a prime example of this.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many cultures all over the world; each culture has their own societies and people to take care of. Each culture has their own set of laws that need to follow, but some could be offensive to what we think is morally right. Which is why Mary Midgley, who was a Senior lecturer in Philosophy at Newcastle University in England, argues that moral reasoning requires the possibility of judging the practices of other cultures. If moral isolationism is the world is sharply divided into separate societies, each with it’s own system of thought, then we ought to respect and tolerate these systems and are therefore forbidden to criticize them. Moral isolationism is the world is sharply divided into separate societies, each with it’s own system…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A person's sense of morality is defined in terms of more abstract principles and values. Moral reasoning is based on individual rights and justice. People now believe that some laws are unjust and should be changed or eliminated. This level is marked by a growing realization that individuals are separate entities from society and that individuals may disobey rules inconsistent with their own principles. Post-conventional moralists live by their own ethical principle that typically include such basic human rights as life, liberty, and justice and view rules as useful but changeable rather than absolute dictates that must be obeyed without question.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of them filled with ego and selfishness and some are kind hearted and selfless people, both are there. Morality or justice plays a pivotal role in our society to maintain the balance and peace among society and also makes a society a better place to live. If the whole society is immoral or unjust then there would be a chaos and it will become worthless to live there. Morality, we can call it norms but which are innate by nature note learned or it is kind of reinforcement by teaching. People don’t do injustice because they have fear of law or they don’t want listed their name in the criminal records, otherwise if the government give free rights to do what ever they want to do, they are just afraid of consequences of getting caught or acting unjustly .…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is the belief that each culture defines their own morality and because of this we should not judge a cultures morality because one is not better than the other. Acceptance is a strength of relativism, because it could promote the idea that we are all different and we should all accept each other for who we are. Another of its strengths is allowing people to choose a moral code to live by and not be subjected to one way of thinking. However there are some downsides to relativism, for example promoting intolerance. Intolerance promoted due to the fact that if a culture is committing genocide relativists say that we are not allowed to judge them because that might just be a part of their culture.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This show how morality varies depends on the society, and on the culture. However, Ishiguro show the possible bad use of this concept, and how the morality of people can be manipulated in a bad way under this concept. In Never Let Me Go Ishiguro shows in the very last sections how people consider cloning as something moral and they do not want to do anything about it. This idea reflect how morality is relative depends on the society. However, in the book Ishiguro shows how controllers with bad intentions are able manipulate this idea to serve their desires.…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics