Raskolnikov places himself on a pedestal, equating his power and prominence with Napoleon, someone who he believes is “capable of evolving something new” and has “never hesitated to shed blood” in this pursuit. (Dostoevsky, p. 220). He rationalizes his crime by claiming that he is like Napoleon, one of the extraordinary men who “in virtue of their innate power” are “criminals”. (Dostoevsky, p. 220). However, one of the most vivid and gruesome scenes in the novel, Raskolnikov’s dream involving the slaughter of an innocent mare, demonstrates that Raskolnikov has fallen short of this ideal. In fact, he is merely an ordinary man. In this dream, Raskolnikov plays a duel role as both the innocent boy watching over the murder of this mare and the malicious and drunk man responsible for the horse’s death. This shows that he is a nihilist capable of committing murder, like the man killed the horse in the dream, yet he is also capable of showing
Raskolnikov places himself on a pedestal, equating his power and prominence with Napoleon, someone who he believes is “capable of evolving something new” and has “never hesitated to shed blood” in this pursuit. (Dostoevsky, p. 220). He rationalizes his crime by claiming that he is like Napoleon, one of the extraordinary men who “in virtue of their innate power” are “criminals”. (Dostoevsky, p. 220). However, one of the most vivid and gruesome scenes in the novel, Raskolnikov’s dream involving the slaughter of an innocent mare, demonstrates that Raskolnikov has fallen short of this ideal. In fact, he is merely an ordinary man. In this dream, Raskolnikov plays a duel role as both the innocent boy watching over the murder of this mare and the malicious and drunk man responsible for the horse’s death. This shows that he is a nihilist capable of committing murder, like the man killed the horse in the dream, yet he is also capable of showing