Protagoras Summary

Improved Essays
The story of Protagoras starts out with a dialogue between Socrates and Hippocrates. Hippocrates is excited that Protagoras is in town because Hippocrates wants to be the disciple of Protagoras. Socrates knows that Hippocrates is young, naïve, and excitable, so he questions him about what he really wants to learn from Protagoras. He says to Hippocrates, “Are you going to commit your soul to the care of a man you call a Sophist, and yet you hardly think that you know what a Sophist is?” Socrates, being a philosopher, cares more about knowing the truth and being correct about your beliefs. But what we learn about Sophist’s is that they are teachers of rhetoric, which means they teach you how to make an argument even if it is incorrect and immoral. Socrates is worried for Hippocrates because Socrates believes that Protagoras is going to bring harm to Hippocrates by turning his soul evil.
Socrates and Hippocrates decide to go to where Protagoras is staying so that they can talk with him. After Protagoras agrees to talk with them, he goes on
…show more content…
Socrates is arguing that virtue is not made up of five different parts. He is trying to convince Protagoras that courage and wisdom are the same thing. He does this saying that you can not have courage without being aware of the truth. It is not that some people are courageous and not wise, they are instead, bold. For example, someone might be bold enough to stick their hand in a fire but that is not courageous. It would be courageous if they stuck their hand in the fire knowing that the fire is hot and that it will burn them, but that takes wisdom. So what we learn from this is that we can not be courageous without wisdom. To have wisdom, you have to have knowledge, and knowledge has to be taught. But this is exactly the opposite of what Socrates started out the argument saying. He started out saying virtue can not be taught, but now he is saying you have to teach

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meno provides two hypothetical definitions of virtue to Socrates. The first definition according to Meno is that virtue is to rule justly. By stating that virtue is to rule, Meno meant that virtue was to be able to rule over people. But Socrates quickly reminds Meno that ruling over others is not a virtue in the instance of the slaves or the children. Furthermore, Socrates remarks that if virtue is to rule, then would it be to rule justly and not unjustly.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ Success in Answering Meno’s Paradox Introduction In the dialogue Meno, Socrates and Meno start by attempting to find what virtue is, but are unsuccessful. They then dig into a more generalized question of how to find what any thing or idea is when one does not know what it is they are looking for. This is Meno 's Paradox. Socrates attempts to solve this paradox through the theory of recollection which states that the human soul is immortal and has knowledge of everything.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Whilst numerous writers have utilized virtue in an ethical context, Socrates identifies ethics directly in what is good for the health of the soul and what behavior mischiefs the soul. Socrates understand his role in Athens is to shame the people, “cannot make a man stupid or random; they simply act random” (Crito, 2007-2012). It is evident that the main foundations that concern Socrates are justice, wisdom and reverence, in caring for the virtue of all, over the virtue of common knowledge, even when it comes at a…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While we have seen that Socrates is good at rejecting incorrect arguments, it is equally important to be able to identify correct ones. The Meno begins with Meno, a friend of Scorates, asking Socrates if virtue can be taught or is it an inborn quality that some posses from birth and others never will. Socrates and his friend then begin to perform an investigation into the nature and form of virtue. When they arrive at the question of how one may know and recognize virtue when it is found, despite not having knowledge of what it is beforehand Meno’s Paradox arises. While both Meno and Scorates agree that virtue is something beneficial within the soul, they struggle to answer how it is one comes to acquire virtue in the first place, whether…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s work Meno, Socrates and Meno discuss the ability to learn. They argue that there is no true learning, only recollection and remembering topics. Meno’s Paradox is presented in this work and essentially states that there is no way for humankind to learn. I wholeheartedly disagree with Meno’s statement on the capability of acquiring new knowledge. In my paper, I will explain Meno’s Paradox and Socrates’s claim about recollection.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates claims to have no knowledge of these types of things, and concedes that if he has any knowledge at all it is of worthless or trivial things. He claims that his purpose for initiating interactions with these reputedly knowledgeable people is first and foremost to prove the oracle wrong, because he believes he really knows nothing. If he can successfully prove the oracle wrong by finding someone who is indeed wiser or more knowledgeable than him, then he will be presented with the opportunity to learn something worthwhile from the person he is engaging, which is his second purpose for these interactions. Unfortunately, this proves to be an unsuccessful method of learning for Socrates because he does not actually learn the fine and good things he has sought to learn; instead he has learned that the reputedly knowledgeable people are merely ignorant of their own ignorance. He determines that they are only truly capable of giving him examples of specific instances where actions seem to showcase the thing that he is seeking knowledge of—such the examples of piety that Euthyphro describes; he also discerns that they are incapable of giving him a definitive definition that is not easily shown to be a contradiction or fallacious in some other way.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates was one of the most noted opponents of the Sophists. As a teacher of dialectics, he was interested in the quest for the truth rather than the art of persuasion (Joseph 110). According to some of the Socratic dialogues recorded by Plato, Socrates thought Sophists were a threat, not because they promoted atheism or immortality, but because they set themselves up as experts on the question “How is one to live?” without having the necessary knowledge. Socrates was concerned that if people’s lives were ruled by rhetoric instead of being guided by philosophy, the pursuit of happiness would overtake the pursuit of the…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Argument for the Immortality of the Soul When Socrates and Meno are halted in their argument by a paradox, Socrates proposes a new idea that will solve the paradox and continue their conversation. He states that the soul is immortal and it has learned everything in past lives. Thus, what men call learning is actually a process of recollection. I will first be giving context as to how this idea came into the dialogue with Meno. Next, I will explain how he puts the same idea forward in Phaedo and then noting the differences between the two dialogues.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogue between Socrates and Meno revolve around a fundamental issue: whether virtue can be taught. However, Socrates indicates that it is unfeasible to answer this question without knowing what virtue really is. He is interested in knowing the intrinsic nature of a virtue and what makes all instances of virtue, virtuous. In other words, the reason why something is a virtue. Although Meno produces his first faulty definition when he says, “If you want the virtue of man, it is easy to say that a man’s virtue consists of being able to manage public affairs…, and be submissive to her husband” (71e), it still does not answer Socrates’ question.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For someone who has virtue they would be regarded as having high moral character, they would be respectable, but not thinking they are wiser than they are. For Socrates who may be regarded as having virtue, he would not think of himself as wiser than he really is, therefore not fearing…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Socrates must be punished, there is no other way to save the Athenian way of life, for he praises the Lacedaemonians, our sworn enemy in these dark times.” Demetrius may be hot headed and not the most reasonable character, but he does have a point. Socrates praises those Oligarchic Spartans, and undermines our Athenian Democracy.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates has been seen as a hero known for seeking the truth who sacrificed his life for philosophy. Socrates, a philosopher, was executed by his community for standing alone against his community and daring to question the sacred beliefs that existed. Although Socrates was seen as a hero for some, there were many who saw Socrates as a dangerous figures. Aristophanes’ Clouds, portrays Socrates as a threat to the political community for undermining the laws that govern the community. Aristophanes’ Clouds presents a conservative yet comedic mocking of what goes against the community in attempt to protect it.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can Virtue Be Taught Essay

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The question “Can virtue be taught?” is a question that has puzzled philosophers for ages. It is a hard question to answer since we do not know what the true definition of virtue is. Socrates attempts to define virtue as knowledge, and if one is knowledgeable they will do the right thing without much effort (Plato, Meno). After time the meaning of virtue has changed. Today one could define virtue as being morally good.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was a Greek philosopher; who life was recorded by his students such as Plato. He is one of the founders of philosophy and he is known for his “Socratic method”. Socrates had a curious mind and he always wondered things. He wanted to find how people should act. We can see this behavior in The Republic when he tries to find a definition for justice.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics