Analysis: A Defense Of Abortion By Jarvis Thomson

Improved Essays
Abortion is an immensely controversial topic in today’s society. Jarvis Thomson makes many arguments on the topic of abortion in the writing of “A Defense of Abortion”. In today’s society, there are many different stances on abortion that include a variety of concepts and situations to consider. Jarvis Thomson says that abortion can be permissible. Many people can concure to that saying babies are innocent and do not mean to harm a mother, but a mother has a right to her body. Many say that the baby has rights in addition to the mother; Thomson would say then a mother can remove a baby if they are unwelcomed and attempted to be prevented. While this is a very prominent topic of argumentation, it is controversial, and can even be hard to prove and explain a particular stance. Jarvis Thomson is one of the few who tries to make a case. Jarvis Thomson believes that abortion can be acceptable, but only under certain circumstances. She claims in that “Abortion is permissible when it’s to save the other’s life since it’s self defense.” (pg.189) This statement is an if only kind of statement. By saying this, Jarvis Thomson is actually allocating the belief that …show more content…
In a war, there are two sides fighting, with each side believing that they are fighting for should be the right and moral thing. On the battlefield, you fight, and you kill people. The people opposing you could possibly be innocent people who joined the war by being drafted or people who were in a position not to be on the front lines, but were moved from lack of bodies. In this situation, regardless of how you arrived there, you are fighting. You are killing people considered your enemy in self defense for not only your country but for yourself, to save your own life. Abortion is no different from this, yet war is seen as the acceptable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I am going to argue that Judith Jarvis Thomson is correct when she argues that abortion is not unjust killing and is permissible. Thomson’s argument is based on a woman’s right to decide to have an abortion on the notion that a fetus is regarded as a person from the time of conception. Thomson reaches her final conclusion that abortion is not unjust killing by countering claims from anti-abortionists, such as Don Marquis, and by defining key terms anti-abortionists commonly use in their arguments. I will first begin by briefly introducing Don Marquis’s view regarding abortion. Marquis argues that it is wrong to kill a fetus because it would deprive it of having a “future like ours”, to which he further defines as the future…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is often a large dispute over abortion and when personhood begins. Some believe it is at fertilization, some think that it is a vague concept, and some believe that it is when the child is born. The common argument against abortion is the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. A philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, believes that even if personhood begins at the stage of being a fetus, there are still times when it is moral to abort the fetus. She believes that personhood begins at a vague time, however she wants to prove even if the fetus is a person, she can provide times when it is still morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is Noonan 's "Argument from Probabilities?" How does this argument work, and what does he think it implies about the morality or immorality of abortion? The argument from probabilities is not aimed at establishing an objective discontinuity which may be taken into account in moral disclosure.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Thomson argues for the fact that there are certain cases where abortion is permissible and certain cases where abortion is impermissible. Thomson starts her argument by explaining that people contemplate their views on abortion by trying to determine a specific time period of when a fetus is considered a human being – some believe this is at contraception and others believe this is at birth. Whatever the case, Thomson uses an analogy of an acorn to demonstrate a pro-choice view. She relates that the development of an acorn into an oak tree does in fact not mean that acorns are oak trees. Much like how we cannot say that a recently fertilized egg is a human being.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, Thomson's reasoning that all abortions are not immoral does extend to the typical cases of abortions because what is important is not the moral justification for abortion but a woman’s right to choose what happens with her…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson presents the anti-abortionist argument in the beginning of her paper. In order to get a better understanding of the argument I have taken the time to put it in numbered premise conclusion form: Every person has a right to life. The fetus is a person.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with the argument Thompson makes in her essay,’ A defense of Abortion,’ that abortion is; morally permissible in the instance of rape or possible health complications that would endanger the life of the mother, and morally permissible in other circumstances due to the mother’s right to her own body outweighing the child’s right to live in the circumstance that the parents took the appropriate precautions to prevent pregnancy. Thompson’s violinist case provides a strong conclusive argument for the moral permissibility of abortion in the instance of rape, but her people seed argument does not provide a plausible argument for the moral permissibility of abortion when proper precautions were taken because she does not factor in the parental…

    • 1265 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A major issue I was confronted with as I was presented with Thomson’s argument is that she says “The fetus, being a person, has a right to life, but as the mother is a person too, so has she a right to life. Presumably they have an equal right to life.” Thomson seems to think that since the right to live for both subjects are equal but the body belongs to the mother, the mother is morally permitted to do as she desires with it and hence, abort the child if necessary. It is here that I sympathize more closely with an idea offered by Don Marquis who argued that the impermissibility of abortion lies in the fact that by killing a child, one is depriving them of the right to live a future life that they else would’ve lived. If we were to sort these two distinct ideas in a way that makes them counterparts to one another, I would argue that the fetus is more justified to their right to life than the mother.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bailey Washington Mr. Reynolds Philosophy MWF 8:30 1 December 2016 Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, she uses examples to try to explain why abortion is not an immoral act as she treats the fetus as an invader to the woman’s body. Some people however do not agree with Thomson’s depiction of how she defended why abortion should be allowed. With this in mind, I will try to argue that abortion is not an immoral act since women have the right to do whatever they so choose to do with their body, especially in the case that the fetus is as Thomson…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is one of the biggest human right abuse there is. This is because just like anyone else a baby has the right to live and has the same right as everyone else. No one should take those right away from them. All children are innocent from anything, they do not know anything there really innocent babies. In the article written by Bradford it state, ‘The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself; and if we can accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell others not to kill one another” (Theresa 1).…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays