A DNR: Who's To Blame?

Improved Essays
Whether treatment, such as a ventilator, is ordinary or extraordinary is not always easy to decide, especially in cases when a patient’s outcome is uncertain or debated. Vice President for Theology at EWTN Global Catholic Network, Colin Donovan, explained:
Determining whether there will be a reasonable hope of benefit to a particular patient can be challenging. Each case must be considered on its own merits, as we seek to make a good prudential judgment, and to provide for our loved ones in a way that corresponds to their real medical needs, so that we neither neglect nor overburden them in the face of powerful medical technology.
Though the morality of the orders themselves are not explicitly addressed by the Church, “do-not-resuscitate” (DNR) orders also use the distinction of ordinary and extraordinary treatment. “A DNR is an advance directive, legally recognized, giving a person or, if not competent, his health care proxy, authority to prevent CPR or, if it has begun, to withdraw it.” If after taking into account the patient's situation, and physical and moral resources, it can be judged that CPR is considered excessively burdensome, therefore being extraordinary
…show more content…
32.39). A right is a just claim or title. Humans do not have a claim on death. No one, whether relative, doctor, or legislature, had the right to decide when their life, or the life of another will end. Even those who lives may be diminished by suffering and illness deserve the respect due to all human beings and the right to life that no one is ever able to take away. Allowing a sick person to die a natural death from whatever illness is plaguing them not only respects the value of the human person, but also gives the patient the chance to reunite their sufferings to the sufferings of Christ and grow closer to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Federal law and religious law often conflict. As they do, the question of who is correct arises. In, At Catholic Hospitals, a ‘Right to Life’ but Not a Right to Death by Katherine Stewart, it explains how Catholic hospitals refuse to take part in “Die with Dignity’. This issue is dominant as the broader, law abiding culture agrees and in fact voted for the death-with-dignity act, but the tight knit culture of Catholicism will not abide by the law because it defies their religious beliefs. This illustrates two cultures can be on polar ends of an argument and both believe they are morally correct because of their cultural influences.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Death/ Natural Introduction There are many ethical and moral issues surrounding Physician assisted death. The question is whether or not severely injured, permanently ill, patient with incurable problems are entitled to get help to end their suffering by using physicians to assist in ending their lives. The Hippocratic Oath suggests that this is outside of the physician’s professional responsibilities. It is very important to know and understand what our loved ones want in terms of end of life matters.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If a person who is being caused excruciating amounts of pain from a sickness and is also already given an estimated time to live, they should be able to decide for themselves whether they want to live or die. In these cases, the government or law should not prohibit a person from escaping the unbearable pain by ending their own suffering. Going back to the example with Matthew and his brother, his story just goes to show that this right should not be taken away. Some people can argue that there were medical treatments to help Matthew, but this begs the question of whether or not today’s society pushes a person’s life expectancy too far under unfair conditions. We as humans should allow a person the right to die with dignity rather than leave them to wither away against their own…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This made others believe that physician assisted death is the correct and most ethical method to avoid suffering and pain instead of other options such as palliative…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American society, the citizens believe that they have rights that protect their free will. The citizens assume that every right given to them is for protection. They do not realize that a right can harm them. Truthfully, some of the rights that are given to the people by the governemnt are not benefical. In A Crime of Compassion by Barbara Huttmann, the author expresses her opinion towards the right of being revived.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This act is by no means an exception to this standard, as a person who has to ponder the mere thought of this as a possibility is faced with the ultimate dilemma of human existence, life or death. It should be common knowledge for everyone that a person’s greatest priority is themself. But the problem for many when facing this truth is that they fear that this will take away from the needs that others have, especially of those who are vulnerable and ill. The authors of the informative article “Physician Assisted Death” acknowledge this worry, in accordance to the possibility of ulterior motives that may come with a person deciding on assisted…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ntroduction The Legal right to die describes in any situation of an adult who is in state of sound mind to decide about his or her treatment to be continued or not, where such voluntary, informed decision is made, should be recognized and respected. According to Lord Goff of Chieveley in 1993, at p. 864, in Airedale NHS Trust versus Bland [1993], the House of Lords held that “The principle of self-determination requires that respect must be given to the wishes of the patient. If an adult patient of sound mind refuses, however unreasonably, to consent to treatment or care by which his life would or might be prolonged, the doctors responsible for his care must give effect to his wishes, even though they do not consider it to be in his best interests to do so. […] To this extent, the principle of the sanctity of human life must yield to the principle of self-determination”.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical principles are not laws, but guiding principles about what is good and what is bad, that should direct doctors and other health care professionals in their work and decision making. Issues arising over end-of-life care involving decisions that affect the nature and timing of an individual's death raise difficult ethical conflicts for all concerned and can be a source of discord between health professionals within a team, health professionals and family members, or between different family members. Ethical dilemmas arise when there is a perceived conflicting duty to the patient, such as a conflict between a duty to preserve life and a duty to act in a patient's best interests, or when an ethical principle such as respect for autonomy conflicts with a duty not to…

    • 3174 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrarily, in PAD, the patient him or herself is the instigator of death (2007, p. 127). In the discussion of physician-assisted death, the nurse’s position varies significantly from the physician. As patient advocates, nurses assist in patient’s decisions relative to their end-of-life care. This paper aims to develop an understanding of patient-assisted death and its implications to the nursing profession. Additionally, it will tackle the current Canadian laws, ethical considerations, and the role of the nurse…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A right to life means that the entity in question must not lose their life through any intentional action of a moral agent. However, like all sweeping claims, there are exceptions; cases in which the “human” aspect of a fundamental human right is up for debate. One could make a strong argument from a Kantian viewpoint that genocidal world leaders ought to be killed for their severe crimes against society. The Utilitarian might argue that the severely mentally disabled lack a right to life.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Actions that are right or wrong is all a matter of a difference of opinion amongst individuals. What they learn from their family, where they grew up, what institutions they attend, their religious views, and their reflection of themselves and the world around them, all influence their morals and ethical beliefs. New ideas are constantly emerging causing us to consistently review and reconsider our beliefs. One idea that emerged and caused ethical consideration is the goal of keeping ill persons alive. This first came in the nineteenth century and has since given rise to moral questions on the care for patients.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays