They found vanessa dead with a wound to the back of the head. So far the husband of the victim and the recently called electrician from the day of the murder has also been interviewed. From studying the crime scene it is in ruled that the husband was angry at his wife vanessa for wanting to leave.
At the scene of the crime there is a woman's suitcase that is packed and sitting as if a woman would be leaving the home. As a rule a fully packed woman's suit case would mean a women in the home would be getting ready to leave the premises. In conclusion a husband would be angry or hurt by the situation of his wife leaving him for another man.
Next the woman vanessa was fully and formally dressed with jewelry as if she was ready to leave home. …show more content…
As a rule flipped furniture and items scattered on the floor would mean there was a struggle. In conclusion this means she had fought back before being struck in the head.
At the scene of the crime the phone in the wall was detached by being forcefully pulled out of the wall of the home. As a rule a wall attached phone being ripped from the wall would mean there was someone angry. In conclusion her husband had been angry by hearing about her leaving him and pulled the phone out of the wall and used it as a weapon.
Vanessa's husband just got the news of his wife leaving him. In result gets mad and starts knocking things over. Then a fight between the couple breaks out and during the struggle he rips the phone from the wall then striking his wife in the back of the head causing a wound the the back of the skull ending her life. Some might think that the electrician valta had killed her but no they are wrong. He would have flipped the breaker back on after the job and he would have taken his tools with him when he left. To settle the debate between the public id recommend a lie detector test about the murder and ask questions about the crime scene to show that volta was never on the property due to the tools of vanessa's husband laying on the counter. Also id fingerprint the murder weapon to show that volta never touched
At the scene of the crime there is a woman's suitcase that is packed and sitting as if a woman would be leaving the home. As a rule a fully packed woman's suit case would mean a women in the home would be getting ready to leave the premises. In conclusion a husband would be angry or hurt by the situation of his wife leaving him for another man.
Next the woman vanessa was fully and formally dressed with jewelry as if she was ready to leave home. …show more content…
As a rule flipped furniture and items scattered on the floor would mean there was a struggle. In conclusion this means she had fought back before being struck in the head.
At the scene of the crime the phone in the wall was detached by being forcefully pulled out of the wall of the home. As a rule a wall attached phone being ripped from the wall would mean there was someone angry. In conclusion her husband had been angry by hearing about her leaving him and pulled the phone out of the wall and used it as a weapon.
Vanessa's husband just got the news of his wife leaving him. In result gets mad and starts knocking things over. Then a fight between the couple breaks out and during the struggle he rips the phone from the wall then striking his wife in the back of the head causing a wound the the back of the skull ending her life. Some might think that the electrician valta had killed her but no they are wrong. He would have flipped the breaker back on after the job and he would have taken his tools with him when he left. To settle the debate between the public id recommend a lie detector test about the murder and ask questions about the crime scene to show that volta was never on the property due to the tools of vanessa's husband laying on the counter. Also id fingerprint the murder weapon to show that volta never touched