Of Inequality And The Social Contract, By Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Great Essays
In his books “The Discourse of Inequality” and “The Social Contract” Jean-Jacques Rousseau supported ideas such as the abolition of private property, the unnaturalness of inequalities or the government by the common people (Delaney). 150 years later, ideas of the same nature were stated in the “Communist Manifesto” of Karl Marx, the book which led to the Russian October Revolution in 1917(Trotsky). Jean Jacques Rousseau was a French philosopher who lived in the 18th century (Enlightenment). He was among the first ones to think of a government where the people, not the sovereign, were in power, and he influenced a lot the french revolution (Delaney). The Russian October Revolution is a communist revolution which occurred in 1917. In February …show more content…
Communism is a form of government based on total equality, where everyone shares their profit for the common good. This system is based on the ideas of Karl Marx, a german philosopher who wrote the “Communist Manifesto” in 1848. There were actually two revolutions that happened in Russia in 1917, but the most famous one occurred in October 1917, and established a communist government in Russia. The revolution started in February 1917, for many reasons. First, the government in power at that time was very impopular. The czar’s authoritarian and reactionary policies were criticized, corruption was everywhere in the administration, and the inneficiency of the system was unbearable. Then, there were also economical reasons. Russia’s implication in World War 1 ruined the country, as the investment needed caused a great financial struggle. The war also had another bad effect on the country. Russia’s army was not technologically up to date, and it struggled to maintain its positions. Therefore, the moral of the armies and of the citizen was very low, and the time was opportune for a revolution. In February, the czar was forced to abdicate, and was later killed. A provisional government was established, but the real power belonged to the soviets, councils formed by ordinary workers who thought that the power should belong to the working class. In april, Lenin, …show more content…
Communism is strongly based on the abolition of private property, as property is believed to be a factor leading to inequality. But Rousseau also defended the unnaturalness of property, he argued that it was not normal, since when humans are born, they don’t have anything, and there is no reason that there should be people that then own more than others. He thought that in order to come back to a true state of equality, property should be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Enlightenment Dbq

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 16th-18th century the Enlightenment many people questioned how they would be governed and how they would be treated. The Enlightenment was a movement that took place through England, France, Germany and other parts of Europe. This movement had an impact on the government and how people should be treated based on their sex. There were five philosophers that took part and the enlightenment movement: Charles de Montesquieu, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because it is believed natural man is to be like this by Rousseau, inequality isn’t prominent in nature. In the other half, Rousseau criticizes the inequality of property -- how work and oppression divides people into property. He also describes the development of technology and how it influences people’s virtues. The property class and the struggle of poor vs. rich led to the idea of a contract to solve the inequality issue. “But according to Rousseau, it is a liability: “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains.””…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The October Revolution: Coup or Social Uprising? Historians along the century have questioned the veracity of the narrative the Bolsheviks fed to the people of Russia and the rest of the world. These historians claim that the communist party has distorted the facts of said revolution to control masses during the Soviet reign. The overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917 was both a Bolshevik-engineered coup d’état and a popular revolution. Chroniclers have debated this statement owing to the fact that said people come from different socio-political backgrounds and the varying historiographies of individual authors.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau places a great deal of importance on the common good and therefore somewhat rejects personal freedoms. He believes that in order to be a part of the Social Contract, in which he believes man is free, personal freedom must be ignored. In the state of nature, man is free to indulge in their personal needs and freedoms and therefore must be disregarded in order to unsure the common good. If an individual disagrees with the majority, they are inherently wrong and should be forced to obey the general will. Rousseau states, “whoever refuses to obey the general will will be forced to do so by the entire community” (Rousseau, 150).…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau born on June 28, 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland is a philosopher, composer and a writer of the 18th century. His political philosophy inspired the Age of Enlightenment in France and across the Europe. He said he is going to challenge social fabric of the 18th century and will stand up for the people. He considered all people to be good and wise; which led him to work for the benefit of them. He also, argued that the government’s priority should be to protect freedom, equality and justice for all even though the majority rules…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is always going to be someone who is bigger and better than you.” This phrase that many children are told is true; however, does it have to control the way society acknowledges each person? As civilizations grew, social hierarchies became more prevalent. Critics like Jean-Jacques Rousseau started to point out how society has created “moral” inequalities which is not natural to man’s state. In Rousseau’s essay, The Discourse of Inequality, he points out how society has caused men to put each other in an unjustifiable category of inequality.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsarist Russia Essay

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist regime in Russia had begun deteriorating in the early 1900s due to widespread political, social, and economic instability. Both the Russo-Japanese War and WW1 exacerbated the situation, leading to higher levels of discontent amongst the people. Below I will analyse the fall of Tsarist Russia from 3 aspects: the political, social, and economic before and after the wars, and explain how each of these factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Tsarist regime. The extent of political instability in Tsarist Russia became apparent in the 1900s.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meanwhile, Karl Marx and Hegel can offer concepts of difficulties related to economic, cultural and environmental adjustment, and ambivalent experiences which can mimic/resemble the challenges experienced by skilled immigrant families; through Marxian and Hegelian eyes, there is this-an indivisible link between globalization and skilled immigrants as skilled immigrants are dependent on globalization to that combined are a source of profiteering. Also, Mitchell (2012) deals with the main ideals of Karl Marx as she unpacks to that institutions only fully respond when the social and economic structures of a country change, which benefits capitalist or as Marx calls it In, “Bourgeoisie”, to that skilled immigrants face challenges (Marx & McLellan,…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although complicated tasks were divided among workers, the workers become more dependent on one another. The division of labor among individuals allowed them to transform land into property, however an unequal distribution of resources emerged as not all individuals held the same talents and abilities as one another. Therefore, the use of resources were unequal since some individuals could benefit by being naturally gifted at their craft while others could find it difficult to survive in a nonsufficient market depending the needs of that community. The institution of property, according to Rousseau, is what adds to the political and social inequalities. It is important to note that Rousseau does not necessarily believe that property is the cause of these inequalities rather he points to the inequality of property as the main driven force behind…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Contract Author: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1762) Introduction His books were a blue print on how Rousseau wanted to know the reasons of why the people gave up their natural liberty over the state of nature. How the political standpoint became such an impact in people’s lives. One of the things he did state in his book that stuck out to me was that, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays