A Comparison Of Brutus In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
In the book Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the speech that Antony gives at Caesar’s funeral is more effective than that of Brutus’, due to the differences Brutus and Antony have on what they believe will be most effective in persuading the plebeians to support them. They have different views on gravitas, and how it will serve them in persuading the plebeians. There are also differences in how they speak to them, including the use of verbal irony and sarcasm, or their straightforwardness. In addition, Antony relies on pathos to make his point, while Brutus uses logos. Due to the way Antony defends his side of the argument, the plebeians side with him, and later end up killing Brutus and the rest of the conspirators. During the funeral …show more content…
While Brutus is straightforward and blunt on his view of the situation, Antony uses verbal irony and sarcasm to make his point. For example, at first, all the Romans believe that Brutus and the other conspirators are honorable men. Antony, who is not allowed to speak poorly of them, brings up times and points to make them seem less so, and brings up points to show times when they were wrong, these men who, according to Antony, “you all know are honorable men” (JC III, II, 136). This is considered verbal irony, because although he calls the conspirators honorable men, he believes the opposite. However, Brutus speaks in a very straightforward manner, meaning every word he says. He is doing what he thinks is right, and is honorable in the fact that he tells what he believes to be the truth when at Caesar’s funeral, telling the plebeians “I slew my best lover for the good of Rome” (JC III, II, 47-48) If Brutus were to speak the plebeians in a more empathetic way, they might be more understanding of his reasoning, and side with him instead of Antony. Brutus is blunt when speaking to the plebeians, while Antony is sarcastic, one of the reasons Antony’s speech is more effective than that of …show more content…
When they speak at the funeral, Brutus uses facts to back his reasoning, and tries to explain to the plebeians that what killing Caesar was the right choice to make. He tells them this information in a way so that they do not think that he killed Caesar for his personal gain. He tells them, “there is joy for his fortune, honor for his valor, and death for his ambition.” (JC III, II, 106-107) trying to make a logical point that Caesar was too ambitious, and that he killed him for the good of Rome. On the other hand, Antony uses pathos in his speech, targeting the plebeians emotions to pin them against the conspirators. Antony during his speech, tells them “ My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar” (JC III, II, 116). Antony’s speech gains the hearts of the romans, ultimately causing them to go against the conspirators. During his speech he focuses on emotions, while Brutus focuses on facts and reasoning, this being the main reason behind Antony’s winning of the plebeians favor during his speech at Caesar’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s, for he won back the Roman people’s loyalty. In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke the people of Rome using ethos. Brutus uses ethos to credit himself, saying that the people should trust his words. The people of Rome can trust in his words because he is a part of the government, so in using ethos was an effective way on persuading the people.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To bring them out of this, it is important that Brutus joins the conspiracy to guide Rome away from the type of rule Caesar used and serve as a better leader. At the time after Caesar’s death, the Romans are confused, and can be easily manipulated. They will believe whatever they may hear. When Brutus speaks at Caesar’s funeral, he immediately turns the crowd from rambunctious and hassled to content with Caesar’s death. Minutes later, Antony convinces the same crowd to avenge Caesar’s death.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Character Study ——Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare, based on the story of the real-life Roman army general and state ruler. Caesar played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. From the plotting of the assassination to the aftermath that followed, two figures stand out to be most important --- Brutus and Marc Antony. By analyzing their attitude to Caesarand their speech to public, two people figures vividly demonstrated in front of the readers.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By using flattery, Antony is able to bring the Plebeians to his side through his speeches at Caesar’s funeral. First, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious… And Brutus is an honourable man” (III,ii,77-87). Antony constantly gives credit to the conspirators, especially Brutus. He repeatedly shows that the other speakers at Caesar’s funeral were honorable too.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the play the tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, one of the primary characters was Marcus Brutus who was a greatly admired man in the Roman society. At the end of the play, Brutus is found dead after getting stabbed by group of people, Mark Antony proclaims Brutus to be "the noblest Roman of them all," stating that he was the only collaborator that killed Caesar with good intentions for all the benefit of all Rome. Antony was in the right with his statement because there are many examples throughout the play that prove Antony's words to be correct. Brutus possesses many characteristics of a noble man. He is very honorable,and a patriotic man all though occasionally hr is a manipulative man.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Latin word “noble” is defined as “having, showing, or coming from personal qualities that people admire such as honesty, generosity, courage...etc”(Webster 's Dictionary). In the 1800’s the word, “noble” was used in many books, speeches and other works of writing. Over time, the adjective “noble” is being used less and less in literature. Noble is commonly used to describe someone with high morals and great character. In the last lines of the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Mark Antony concludes about Brutus, “This was the noblest Roman of them all” (V.v. 74-81).…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony makes the people remember all that Caesar has done for them, and slowly manipulates them with his words. “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men”(III,ii,139). Again Antony uses parallel structure to sway the crowd. He tells them that he can’t read the will because they are men and would become enraged, then tells them that they are his heirs. Antony understands that in order to go up against the conspirators, he needs the people and can only get them, by manipulating their emotions to discredit Brutus.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar was killed just for having ambition. Maybe the determination to make everyone slaves. With all that said Brutus did have the better funeral speech than Antony, he not only spoke about why he killed Caesar he commemorated him as his friend that he had so much love for. Antony did not really entice the reader with his speech to summarize what he said is Brutus is an honorable man (x3 times), Caesar did not have any ambition because he brought captives home to Rome and the money brought great wealth to the city, Antony tried to give Caesar a kingly crown and he refused three times, and the people should love Caesar as they once did. These statements do not entice the reader Antony should have talked more about the bad that Caesar did.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, Antony uses the stylistic choice of irony when the conspirators and Brutus were called honourable men. Everytime Antony described Brutus as “honourable” he would use an increasingly sarcastic tone, until the last time in the speech, it was felt as if the meaning was changed. The last time Antony calls Brutus honourable, the speech hugely impacts the crowd to changing the mindset of Brutus’s, which is that Caesar was killed for the better of Rome, to the mindset that Brutus and the rest of the conspirators are traitors. The use of irony converted the mood of the audience from accepting Caesar’s death, to feeling angry and in need to assassinate Caesar’s killers. Additionally, the use of irony in the speech advocates the theme of fire and blood, because Antony was trying to convey the message of assassinating Brutus and also, he was smearing Caesar’s blood among all the conspirators.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays